Accuracy of Selective Enamel Etching: A Computer-assisted Imaging Analysis.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
T Amran, D Meier, J Amato, T Connert, M B Blatz, R Weiger, F Eggmann
{"title":"Accuracy of Selective Enamel Etching: A Computer-assisted Imaging Analysis.","authors":"T Amran,&nbsp;D Meier,&nbsp;J Amato,&nbsp;T Connert,&nbsp;M B Blatz,&nbsp;R Weiger,&nbsp;F Eggmann","doi":"10.2341/22-114-L","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the accuracy of selective enamel etching (SEE) in a laboratory setup simulating clinical conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>A model with permanent human teeth was fabricated. It included a first mandibular molar with a mesio-occlusal-distal inlay preparation, a maxillary central incisor, and a canine with a class IV and class V cavity, respectively. Two dentists (with 1 year and 10 years work experience) repeatedly (n=10 per cavity) performed SEE with a custom gel that had identical rheological properties as a commercially available phosphoric acid etchant. An intraoral scanner was used for image acquisition. To assess the accuracy of SEE, special software was used (OraCheck, Cyfex, Zurich, Switzerland). Two independent investigators analyzed baseline scans and scans taken of the cavities while the gel was in place. The statistical analysis comprised t-tests, Pearson correlation, and analysis of variance (α=0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The level of accuracy, whose average values ranged from 61.1% to 87.0%, showed significant differences between teeth, with the highest level observed in the class V cavity, followed by the class II inlay preparation and the class IV cavity (p<0.001). Across the cavities, no significant correlation was observed between the application time and the accuracy of SEE (p=0.07).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This laboratory study suggests that inadvertent conditioning of dentin adjacent to enamel may be common during SEE. Investigations involving larger samples of dentists are needed to corroborate this finding.</p>","PeriodicalId":19502,"journal":{"name":"Operative dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2341/22-114-L","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the accuracy of selective enamel etching (SEE) in a laboratory setup simulating clinical conditions.

Methods and materials: A model with permanent human teeth was fabricated. It included a first mandibular molar with a mesio-occlusal-distal inlay preparation, a maxillary central incisor, and a canine with a class IV and class V cavity, respectively. Two dentists (with 1 year and 10 years work experience) repeatedly (n=10 per cavity) performed SEE with a custom gel that had identical rheological properties as a commercially available phosphoric acid etchant. An intraoral scanner was used for image acquisition. To assess the accuracy of SEE, special software was used (OraCheck, Cyfex, Zurich, Switzerland). Two independent investigators analyzed baseline scans and scans taken of the cavities while the gel was in place. The statistical analysis comprised t-tests, Pearson correlation, and analysis of variance (α=0.05).

Results: The level of accuracy, whose average values ranged from 61.1% to 87.0%, showed significant differences between teeth, with the highest level observed in the class V cavity, followed by the class II inlay preparation and the class IV cavity (p<0.001). Across the cavities, no significant correlation was observed between the application time and the accuracy of SEE (p=0.07).

Conclusion: This laboratory study suggests that inadvertent conditioning of dentin adjacent to enamel may be common during SEE. Investigations involving larger samples of dentists are needed to corroborate this finding.

选择性珐琅蚀刻的准确性:计算机辅助成像分析。
目的:在模拟临床条件的实验室环境下,评估选择性牙釉质蚀刻(SEE)的准确性。方法与材料:制作恒牙模型。它包括第一下颌磨牙与中牙合远端嵌体准备,上颌中切牙和犬齿与IV类和V类腔分别。两名牙医(分别有1年和10年工作经验)反复(每个腔n=10)使用与市售磷酸蚀刻剂具有相同流变性能的定制凝胶进行SEE。口腔内扫描仪用于图像采集。为了评估SEE的准确性,使用了特殊的软件(OraCheck, Cyfex, Zurich, Switzerland)。两名独立调查人员分析了凝胶放置时对空洞的基线扫描和扫描结果。统计分析包括t检验、Pearson相关和方差分析(α=0.05)。结果:不同牙体的准确度平均值为61.1% ~ 87.0%,其中V类牙体的准确度最高,其次是II类嵌体制备,IV类牙体的准确度最高。(结论:本实验室研究表明,在SEE过程中,牙本质邻近牙釉质的无意识调理可能是常见的。需要对牙医进行更大规模的调查来证实这一发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Operative dentistry
Operative dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Operative Dentistry is a refereed, international journal published bi-monthly and distributed to subscribers in over 50 countries. In 2012, we printed 84 articles (672 pages). Papers were submitted by authors from 45 countries, in the categories of Clinical Research, Laboratory Research, Clinical Techniques/Case Presentations and Invited Papers, as well as Editorials and Abstracts. One of the strong points of our journal is that our current publication time for accepted manuscripts is 4 to 6 months from the date of submission. Clinical Techniques/Case Presentations have a very quick turnaround time, which allows for very rapid publication of clinical based concepts. We also provide color for those papers that would benefit from its use. The journal does not accept any advertising but you will find postings for faculty positions. Additionally, the journal also does not rent, sell or otherwise allow its subscriber list to be used by any other entity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信