Rumination in bipolar disorder associated with brain network and behavioural measures of inhibitory executive control.

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Acta Neuropsychiatrica Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-25 DOI:10.1017/neu.2023.36
Tina Chou, Darin D Dougherty, Andrew A Nierenberg, Sharmin Ghaznavi
{"title":"Rumination in bipolar disorder associated with brain network and behavioural measures of inhibitory executive control.","authors":"Tina Chou, Darin D Dougherty, Andrew A Nierenberg, Sharmin Ghaznavi","doi":"10.1017/neu.2023.36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Rumination is a passive form of negative self-focused cognition that predicts depressive episodes for individuals with bipolar disorder (BD). Individuals with BD also have impaired inhibitory executive control; rumination in BD may therefore reflect executive dysfunction. We investigated the relationship between a neural measure of executive functioning (functional connectivity between the frontoparietal control network [FPCN] and the default mode network [DMN] during an effortful task), behavioural measures of executive functioning (the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function) and rumination (the Ruminative Responses Scale).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifteen individuals with BD and fifteen healthy controls underwent MRI scans during mental distraction. Using CONN toolbox, between-network FPCN-DMN connectivity values were calculated. We conducted Pearson's <i>r</i> bivariate correlations between connectivity values, BRIEF and RRS scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>RRS scores were positively correlated with BRIEF Behavioral Regulation Index (BRI) scores. In individuals with BD, there was a positive correlation between FPCN-DMN functional connectivity during distraction and BRIEF BRI scores. FPCN-DMN functional connectivity was also positively correlated with RRS ruminative brooding scores. Healthy controls did not show significant correlations between these behavioural and neural measures of executive functioning and rumination.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For individuals with BD, the greater the tendency to ruminate and the higher the executive dysfunction, the stronger the connectivity between an executive control network and a network involved in rumination during an unrelated cognitive task. This could reflect continual attempts to inhibit ruminative thinking and shift back to the distraction task. Therefore, engagement in rumination may reflect failed inhibitory executive control.</p>","PeriodicalId":7066,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neuropsychiatrica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neuropsychiatrica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/neu.2023.36","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Rumination is a passive form of negative self-focused cognition that predicts depressive episodes for individuals with bipolar disorder (BD). Individuals with BD also have impaired inhibitory executive control; rumination in BD may therefore reflect executive dysfunction. We investigated the relationship between a neural measure of executive functioning (functional connectivity between the frontoparietal control network [FPCN] and the default mode network [DMN] during an effortful task), behavioural measures of executive functioning (the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function) and rumination (the Ruminative Responses Scale).

Methods: Fifteen individuals with BD and fifteen healthy controls underwent MRI scans during mental distraction. Using CONN toolbox, between-network FPCN-DMN connectivity values were calculated. We conducted Pearson's r bivariate correlations between connectivity values, BRIEF and RRS scores.

Results: RRS scores were positively correlated with BRIEF Behavioral Regulation Index (BRI) scores. In individuals with BD, there was a positive correlation between FPCN-DMN functional connectivity during distraction and BRIEF BRI scores. FPCN-DMN functional connectivity was also positively correlated with RRS ruminative brooding scores. Healthy controls did not show significant correlations between these behavioural and neural measures of executive functioning and rumination.

Conclusion: For individuals with BD, the greater the tendency to ruminate and the higher the executive dysfunction, the stronger the connectivity between an executive control network and a network involved in rumination during an unrelated cognitive task. This could reflect continual attempts to inhibit ruminative thinking and shift back to the distraction task. Therefore, engagement in rumination may reflect failed inhibitory executive control.

双相情感障碍患者的反刍与抑制性执行控制的大脑网络和行为测量有关。
目的:反刍是一种消极的自我关注认知形式,可预测双相情感障碍(BD)患者的抑郁发作。双相情感障碍患者的抑制性执行控制能力也会受损;因此,双相情感障碍患者的反刍可能反映了执行功能障碍。我们研究了执行功能的神经测量(努力任务中前额叶控制网络[FPCN]和默认模式网络[DMN]之间的功能连接)、执行功能的行为测量(执行功能行为评定量表)和反刍(反刍反应量表)之间的关系:方法:15 名 BD 患者和 15 名健康对照者在精神分散时接受了核磁共振成像扫描。使用 CONN 工具箱计算网络间 FPCN-DMN 连接值。我们在连通性值、BRIEF 和 RRS 评分之间进行了 Pearson's r 双变量相关性分析:结果:RRS评分与BRIEF行为调节指数(BRI)评分呈正相关。在BD患者中,分心时FPCN-DMN功能连接与BRIEF BRI评分呈正相关。FPCN-DMN功能连接与RRS反刍思索评分也呈正相关。健康对照组在执行功能和反刍的行为和神经测量之间没有显示出明显的相关性:结论:对于 BD 患者来说,反刍倾向越强、执行功能障碍越严重,执行控制网络与反刍网络之间在不相关的认知任务中的连接性就越强。这可能反映了人们不断试图抑制反刍思维,并转回到分散注意力的任务上。因此,反刍可能反映了抑制性执行控制的失败。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
Acta Neuropsychiatrica 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
30
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Neuropsychiatrica is an international journal focussing on translational neuropsychiatry. It publishes high-quality original research papers and reviews. The Journal''s scope specifically highlights the pathway from discovery to clinical applications, healthcare and global health that can be viewed broadly as the spectrum of work that marks the pathway from discovery to global health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信