Assessing Pediatric Inter-Hospital Transfer: A single-center, Retrospective, Observational Study of Saudi Arabia's National Life-Saving Protocol.

Hakem Alomani, Ahmed Ramadan, Gehad Omran, Mohamed Elbiomy, Mahmoud Elzonfly, Asma Alenazi, Njood AlBarrak, Ali A Alakhfash, Ramesh K Vishwakarma, Fawaz Alanzi, Yousef Alotaibi
{"title":"Assessing Pediatric Inter-Hospital Transfer: A single-center, Retrospective, Observational Study of Saudi Arabia's National Life-Saving Protocol.","authors":"Hakem Alomani, Ahmed Ramadan, Gehad Omran, Mohamed Elbiomy, Mahmoud Elzonfly, Asma Alenazi, Njood AlBarrak, Ali A Alakhfash, Ramesh K Vishwakarma, Fawaz Alanzi, Yousef Alotaibi","doi":"10.26502/jppch.74050130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the accuracy of our national Life-Saving Protocol (LSP). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study addressing this issue in Saudi Arabia.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>LSP was created to facilitate triaging patients with LIFE or LIMB threatening conditions in peripheral hospitals with limited services to large regional hospitals to receive definitive care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This is a retrospective single-center observational study over 12 months studying the patients who arrived via LSP to our Emergency room (ED), at the only regional pediatric hospital. For the subgroup of patients who were admitted to PICU through LSP, we further assessed their outcomes like mortality and length of stay (LOS) through a matched case-control study of 1:1 with similar patients who were admitted to our PICU via other routes rather than LSP. The primary outcome is to assess the accuracy of the LSP in triaging pediatric patients with LIFE of LIMB conditions. Secondary outcomes include assessing the association between LSP and (mortality, LOS) for those who were admitted to the regional PICU via LSP compared to patients admitted to PICU via other sources of admission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 118 patients arrived at our ED via LSP. Only 43 patients (36 %) were admitted to the PICU with LIFE or LIMB conditions. A total of 64 patients (54%) of the patients were admitted directly to the general pediatric ward from ED level due to absence of LIFE of LIMB threatening condition and 8% (n=9) were discharged immediately home from the ED level due to lack of any significant illness. One patient died at ED level, and one was referred to another hospital with a minor orthopedic injury. For those who were admitted to the PICU via LSP, the mortality rate was (13.9%) (6/43), and the control group was (4.6%) (2/43) with a p-value of 0.08.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LSP is an excellent initiative and essential tool in our healthcare system; however, our study showed huge variation in the ability of the system to recognize true pediatric patients with LIFE or LIMB conditions. Our study might form a stepping-stone in future studies assessing the LSP at the national level.</p>","PeriodicalId":73894,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatrics, perinatology and child health","volume":"6 4","pages":"452-464"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9879325/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatrics, perinatology and child health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26502/jppch.74050130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine the accuracy of our national Life-Saving Protocol (LSP). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study addressing this issue in Saudi Arabia.

Background: LSP was created to facilitate triaging patients with LIFE or LIMB threatening conditions in peripheral hospitals with limited services to large regional hospitals to receive definitive care.

Method: This is a retrospective single-center observational study over 12 months studying the patients who arrived via LSP to our Emergency room (ED), at the only regional pediatric hospital. For the subgroup of patients who were admitted to PICU through LSP, we further assessed their outcomes like mortality and length of stay (LOS) through a matched case-control study of 1:1 with similar patients who were admitted to our PICU via other routes rather than LSP. The primary outcome is to assess the accuracy of the LSP in triaging pediatric patients with LIFE of LIMB conditions. Secondary outcomes include assessing the association between LSP and (mortality, LOS) for those who were admitted to the regional PICU via LSP compared to patients admitted to PICU via other sources of admission.

Results: During the study period, 118 patients arrived at our ED via LSP. Only 43 patients (36 %) were admitted to the PICU with LIFE or LIMB conditions. A total of 64 patients (54%) of the patients were admitted directly to the general pediatric ward from ED level due to absence of LIFE of LIMB threatening condition and 8% (n=9) were discharged immediately home from the ED level due to lack of any significant illness. One patient died at ED level, and one was referred to another hospital with a minor orthopedic injury. For those who were admitted to the PICU via LSP, the mortality rate was (13.9%) (6/43), and the control group was (4.6%) (2/43) with a p-value of 0.08.

Conclusion: LSP is an excellent initiative and essential tool in our healthcare system; however, our study showed huge variation in the ability of the system to recognize true pediatric patients with LIFE or LIMB conditions. Our study might form a stepping-stone in future studies assessing the LSP at the national level.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

评估儿科医院间转院:沙特阿拉伯国家救生协议的单中心回顾性观察研究。
目的研究我国救生协议(LSP)的准确性。据我们所知,这是沙特阿拉伯针对这一问题进行的首次研究:背景:制定 LSP 的目的是为了方便将服务有限的外围医院中危及生命或肢体的患者分流到大型地区医院,以接受明确的治疗:这是一项为期 12 个月的回顾性单中心观察研究,研究对象是通过 LSP 抵达本院急诊室(ED)的患者,本院是唯一一家地区性儿科医院。对于通过 LSP 入住 PICU 的患者亚群,我们通过与通过其他途径而非 LSP 入住本院 PICU 的类似患者进行 1:1 配对病例对照研究,进一步评估了他们的死亡率和住院时间(LOS)等结果。主要结果是评估 LSP 在分流患有 LIFMB 病症的儿科患者方面的准确性。次要结果包括评估与通过其他途径进入 PICU 的患者相比,通过 LSP 进入地区 PICU 的患者的 LSP 与(死亡率、住院时间)之间的关联:研究期间,118 名患者通过 LSP 抵达我们的急诊室。只有 43 名患者(36%)因 LIFE 或 LIMB 病症入住 PICU。共有 64 名患者(54%)因无 LIFE 或 LIMB 威胁而从急诊科直接入住普通儿科病房,8% 的患者(9 人)因无任何重大疾病而从急诊科立即出院回家。一名患者在急诊室死亡,一名因骨科轻伤被转至其他医院。通过 LSP 进入 PICU 的患者死亡率为(13.9%)(6/43),对照组为(4.6%)(2/43),P 值为 0.08:LSP 是一项出色的举措,也是我们医疗系统中必不可少的工具;然而,我们的研究表明,该系统在识别真正的 LIFE 或 LIMB 病症儿科患者的能力方面存在巨大差异。我们的研究可能为今后在全国范围内评估 LSP 的研究奠定基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信