Spino-pelvic radiological parameters: Comparison of measurements obtained by radiologists using the traditional method versus spine surgeons using a semi-automated software (Surgimap).

Abstract

Background: Spinopelvic balance measurement is a key point to get an appropriate diagnosis and treatment in a group of spine pathologies; thus, it seems necessary the evaluation of different methods for obtaining the most reliable values. For that reason, different automatic and semi-automatic computer-assisted tools have been developed, and one example of them is Surgimap.

Purpose: To demonstrate that the sagittal balance measurements with Surgimap are equal and more time-efficient than with Agfa-Enterprise.

Material and methods: Retrospective-prospective study. Biased comparative analysis of radiographic measurements performed on two different occasions (96 h interval), between two spine surgeons using Surgimap and two radiologists using the traditional Cobb method (TCM) with the Agfa-Enterprise program in 36 full spine lateral X-ray, determining inter- and intra-observer reliability and the mean time required to obtain the measurements.

Results: Measurements with both methods demonstrated an excellent intra-observer correlation (Surgimap: PCC 0.95 [0.85-0.99]; TCM: PCC 0.90 [0.81-0.99]). Inter-observer correlation also demonstrated an excellent relationship (PCC >0.95). Thoracic kyphosis (TK) demonstrated the lowest levels of inter-observer correlation (PCC: 0.75). The average time in seconds with TCM was 154.6, while with the Surgimap it was 41.8 s.

Conclusion: Surgimap proved to be equally reliable and 3.5 times faster. Therefore, in consistency with the available literature, our results would allow us to promote the use of Surgimap as a clinical diagnostic tool considering precision and efficiency.