Random Effects Multinomial Processing Tree Models: A Maximum Likelihood Approach.

IF 2.9 2区 心理学 Q1 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Psychometrika Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-29 DOI:10.1007/s11336-023-09921-w
Steffen Nestler, Edgar Erdfelder
{"title":"Random Effects Multinomial Processing Tree Models: A Maximum Likelihood Approach.","authors":"Steffen Nestler, Edgar Erdfelder","doi":"10.1007/s11336-023-09921-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present article proposes and evaluates marginal maximum likelihood (ML) estimation methods for hierarchical multinomial processing tree (MPT) models with random and fixed effects. We assume that an identifiable MPT model with S parameters holds for each participant. Of these S parameters, R parameters are assumed to vary randomly between participants, and the remaining [Formula: see text] parameters are assumed to be fixed. We also propose an extended version of the model that includes effects of covariates on MPT model parameters. Because the likelihood functions of both versions of the model are too complex to be tractable, we propose three numerical methods to approximate the integrals that occur in the likelihood function, namely, the Laplace approximation (LA), adaptive Gauss-Hermite quadrature (AGHQ), and Quasi Monte Carlo (QMC) integration. We compare these three methods in a simulation study and show that AGHQ performs well in terms of both bias and coverage rate. QMC also performs well but the number of responses per participant must be sufficiently large. In contrast, LA fails quite often due to undefined standard errors. We also suggest ML-based methods to test the goodness of fit and to compare models taking model complexity into account. The article closes with an illustrative empirical application and an outlook on possible extensions and future applications of the proposed ML approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":54534,"journal":{"name":"Psychometrika","volume":"88 3","pages":"809-829"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10444666/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychometrika","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-023-09921-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present article proposes and evaluates marginal maximum likelihood (ML) estimation methods for hierarchical multinomial processing tree (MPT) models with random and fixed effects. We assume that an identifiable MPT model with S parameters holds for each participant. Of these S parameters, R parameters are assumed to vary randomly between participants, and the remaining [Formula: see text] parameters are assumed to be fixed. We also propose an extended version of the model that includes effects of covariates on MPT model parameters. Because the likelihood functions of both versions of the model are too complex to be tractable, we propose three numerical methods to approximate the integrals that occur in the likelihood function, namely, the Laplace approximation (LA), adaptive Gauss-Hermite quadrature (AGHQ), and Quasi Monte Carlo (QMC) integration. We compare these three methods in a simulation study and show that AGHQ performs well in terms of both bias and coverage rate. QMC also performs well but the number of responses per participant must be sufficiently large. In contrast, LA fails quite often due to undefined standard errors. We also suggest ML-based methods to test the goodness of fit and to compare models taking model complexity into account. The article closes with an illustrative empirical application and an outlook on possible extensions and future applications of the proposed ML approach.

Abstract Image

随机效应多叉处理树模型:最大似然法。
本文提出并评估了具有随机效应和固定效应的分层多叉处理树(MPT)模型的边际最大似然(ML)估计方法。我们假设每个参与者都有一个可识别的 MPT 模型,该模型有 S 个参数。在这 S 个参数中,假定 R 个参数在不同参与者之间随机变化,其余[公式:见正文]参数假定为固定参数。我们还提出了一个扩展版本的模型,其中包括协变量对 MPT 模型参数的影响。由于两个版本模型的似然函数都过于复杂,难以处理,因此我们提出了三种数值方法来近似似然函数中出现的积分,即拉普拉斯近似(LA)、自适应高斯-赫米特正交(AGHQ)和准蒙特卡罗积分(QMC)。我们在模拟研究中对这三种方法进行了比较,结果表明 AGHQ 在偏差和覆盖率方面都表现出色。QMC 也有很好的表现,但每个参与者的回答数量必须足够大。相比之下,LA 由于标准误差不确定而经常失败。我们还提出了基于 ML 的方法来测试拟合度,并在考虑模型复杂性的情况下对模型进行比较。文章最后介绍了一个示例性的经验应用,并对所建议的 ML 方法的可能扩展和未来应用进行了展望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychometrika
Psychometrika 数学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Psychometrika is devoted to the advancement of theory and methodology for behavioral data in psychology, education and the social and behavioral sciences generally. Its coverage is offered in two sections: Theory and Methods (T& M), and Application Reviews and Case Studies (ARCS). T&M articles present original research and reviews on the development of quantitative models, statistical methods, and mathematical techniques for evaluating data from psychology, the social and behavioral sciences and related fields. Application Reviews can be integrative, drawing together disparate methodologies for applications, or comparative and evaluative, discussing advantages and disadvantages of one or more methodologies in applications. Case Studies highlight methodology that deepens understanding of substantive phenomena through more informative data analysis, or more elegant data description.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信