Childhood Trauma and Epigenetics: State of the Science and Future.

IF 7.4 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
N Gladish, S M Merrill, Michael S Kobor
{"title":"Childhood Trauma and Epigenetics: State of the Science and Future.","authors":"N Gladish,&nbsp;S M Merrill,&nbsp;Michael S Kobor","doi":"10.1007/s40572-022-00381-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>There is a great deal of interest regarding the biological embedding of childhood trauma and social exposures through epigenetic mechanisms, including DNA methylation (DNAm), but a comprehensive understanding has been hindered by issues of limited reproducibility between studies. This review presents a summary of the literature on childhood trauma and DNAm, highlights issues in the field, and proposes some potential solutions.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Investigations of the associations between DNAm and childhood trauma are commonly performed using candidate gene approaches, specifically involving genes related to neurological and stress pathways. Childhood trauma is defined in a wide range of ways in several societal contexts. However, although variations in DNAm are frequently found in stress-related genes, unsupervised epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) have shown limited reproducibility both between studies and in relating these changes to exposures. The reproducibility of childhood trauma DNAm studies, and the field of social epigenetics in general, may be improved by increasing sample sizes, standardizing variables, making use of effect size thresholds, collecting longitudinal and intervention samples, appropriately accounting for known confounding factors, and applying causal analysis wherever possible, such as \"two-step epigenetic Mendelian randomization.\"</p>","PeriodicalId":10775,"journal":{"name":"Current Environmental Health Reports","volume":"9 4","pages":"661-672"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Environmental Health Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-022-00381-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose of review: There is a great deal of interest regarding the biological embedding of childhood trauma and social exposures through epigenetic mechanisms, including DNA methylation (DNAm), but a comprehensive understanding has been hindered by issues of limited reproducibility between studies. This review presents a summary of the literature on childhood trauma and DNAm, highlights issues in the field, and proposes some potential solutions.

Recent findings: Investigations of the associations between DNAm and childhood trauma are commonly performed using candidate gene approaches, specifically involving genes related to neurological and stress pathways. Childhood trauma is defined in a wide range of ways in several societal contexts. However, although variations in DNAm are frequently found in stress-related genes, unsupervised epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) have shown limited reproducibility both between studies and in relating these changes to exposures. The reproducibility of childhood trauma DNAm studies, and the field of social epigenetics in general, may be improved by increasing sample sizes, standardizing variables, making use of effect size thresholds, collecting longitudinal and intervention samples, appropriately accounting for known confounding factors, and applying causal analysis wherever possible, such as "two-step epigenetic Mendelian randomization."

儿童创伤和表观遗传学:科学现状和未来。
综述目的:通过表观遗传机制,包括DNA甲基化(DNAm),对儿童创伤和社会暴露的生物学嵌入有很大的兴趣,但由于研究之间的可重复性有限,对其的全面理解受到阻碍。本文综述了关于儿童创伤和DNAm的文献,强调了该领域的问题,并提出了一些可能的解决方案。最近的研究发现:DNAm与儿童创伤之间关系的研究通常使用候选基因方法,特别是涉及与神经和应激途径相关的基因。在不同的社会背景下,童年创伤有不同的定义。然而,尽管在应激相关基因中经常发现dna变异,但无监督的全表观基因组关联研究(EWAS)表明,在研究之间以及将这些变化与暴露联系起来的研究中,可重复性有限。通过增加样本量,标准化变量,利用效应大小阈值,收集纵向和干预样本,适当地考虑已知的混杂因素,并尽可能地应用因果分析,例如“两步表观遗传孟德尔随机化”,可以提高儿童创伤dna研究的可重复性,以及一般的社会表观遗传学领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
1.30%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Current Environmental Health Reports provides up-to-date expert reviews in environmental health. The goal is to evaluate and synthesize original research in all disciplines relevant for environmental health sciences, including basic research, clinical research, epidemiology, and environmental policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信