Automated antigen assays display a high heterogeneity for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern, including several Omicron sublineages.

IF 5.5 3区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Medical Microbiology and Immunology Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-10 DOI:10.1007/s00430-023-00774-9
Andreas Osterman, Franziska Krenn, Maximilian Iglhaut, Irina Badell, Andreas Lehner, Patricia M Späth, Marcel Stern, Hanna Both, Sabine Bender, Maximilian Muenchhoff, Alexander Graf, Stefan Krebs, Helmut Blum, Timo Grimmer, Jürgen Durner, Ludwig Czibere, Christopher Dächert, Natascha Grzimek-Koschewa, Ulrike Protzer, Lars Kaderali, Hanna-Mari Baldauf, Oliver T Keppler
{"title":"Automated antigen assays display a high heterogeneity for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern, including several Omicron sublineages.","authors":"Andreas Osterman, Franziska Krenn, Maximilian Iglhaut, Irina Badell, Andreas Lehner, Patricia M Späth, Marcel Stern, Hanna Both, Sabine Bender, Maximilian Muenchhoff, Alexander Graf, Stefan Krebs, Helmut Blum, Timo Grimmer, Jürgen Durner, Ludwig Czibere, Christopher Dächert, Natascha Grzimek-Koschewa, Ulrike Protzer, Lars Kaderali, Hanna-Mari Baldauf, Oliver T Keppler","doi":"10.1007/s00430-023-00774-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diagnostic tests for direct pathogen detection have been instrumental to contain the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. Automated, quantitative, laboratory-based nucleocapsid antigen (Ag) tests for SARS-CoV-2 have been launched alongside nucleic acid-based test systems and point-of-care (POC) lateral-flow Ag tests. Here, we evaluated four commercial Ag tests on automated platforms for the detection of different sublineages of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant of concern (VoC) (B.1.1.529) in comparison with \"non-Omicron\" VoCs. A total of 203 Omicron PCR-positive respiratory swabs (53 BA.1, 48 BA.2, 23 BQ.1, 39 XBB.1.5 and 40 other subvariants) from the period February to March 2022 and from March 2023 were examined. In addition, tissue culture-expanded clinical isolates of Delta (B.1.617.2), Omicron-BA.1, -BF.7, -BN.1 and -BQ.1 were studied. These results were compared to previously reported data from 107 clinical \"non-Omicron\" samples from the end of the second pandemic wave (February to March 2021) as well as cell culture-derived samples of wildtype (wt) EU-1 (B.1.177), Alpha VoC (B.1.1.7) and Beta VoC (B.1.351)). All four commercial Ag tests were able to detect at least 90.9% of Omicron-containing samples with high viral loads (Ct < 25). The rates of true-positive test results for BA.1/BA.2-positive samples with intermediate viral loads (Ct 25-30) ranged between 6.7% and 100.0%, while they dropped to 0 to 15.4% for samples with low Ct values (> 30). This heterogeneity was reflected also by the tests' 50%-limit of detection (LoD50) values ranging from 44,444 to 1,866,900 Geq/ml. Respiratory samples containing Omicron-BQ.1/XBB.1.5 or other Omicron subvariants that emerged in 2023 were detected with enormous heterogeneity (0 to 100%) for the intermediate and low viral load ranges with LoD50 values between 23,019 and 1,152,048 Geq/ml. In contrast, detection of \"non-Omicron\" samples was more sensitive, scoring positive in 35 to 100% for the intermediate and 1.3 to 32.9% of cases for the low viral loads, respectively, corresponding to LoD50 values ranging from 6181 to 749,792 Geq/ml. All four assays detected cell culture-expanded VoCs Alpha, Beta, Delta and Omicron subvariants carrying up to six amino acid mutations in the nucleocapsid protein with sensitivities comparable to the non-VoC EU-1. Overall, automated quantitative SARS-CoV-2 Ag assays are not more sensitive than standard rapid antigen tests used in POC settings and show a high heterogeneity in performance for VoC recognition. The best of these automated Ag tests may have the potential to complement nucleic acid-based assays for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics in settings not primarily focused on the protection of vulnerable groups. In light of the constant emergence of new Omicron subvariants and recombinants, most recently the XBB lineage, these tests' performance must be regularly re-evaluated, especially when new VoCs carry mutations in the nucleocapsid protein or immunological and clinical parameters change.</p>","PeriodicalId":18369,"journal":{"name":"Medical Microbiology and Immunology","volume":"212 5","pages":"307-322"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10501957/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Microbiology and Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00430-023-00774-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Diagnostic tests for direct pathogen detection have been instrumental to contain the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. Automated, quantitative, laboratory-based nucleocapsid antigen (Ag) tests for SARS-CoV-2 have been launched alongside nucleic acid-based test systems and point-of-care (POC) lateral-flow Ag tests. Here, we evaluated four commercial Ag tests on automated platforms for the detection of different sublineages of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant of concern (VoC) (B.1.1.529) in comparison with "non-Omicron" VoCs. A total of 203 Omicron PCR-positive respiratory swabs (53 BA.1, 48 BA.2, 23 BQ.1, 39 XBB.1.5 and 40 other subvariants) from the period February to March 2022 and from March 2023 were examined. In addition, tissue culture-expanded clinical isolates of Delta (B.1.617.2), Omicron-BA.1, -BF.7, -BN.1 and -BQ.1 were studied. These results were compared to previously reported data from 107 clinical "non-Omicron" samples from the end of the second pandemic wave (February to March 2021) as well as cell culture-derived samples of wildtype (wt) EU-1 (B.1.177), Alpha VoC (B.1.1.7) and Beta VoC (B.1.351)). All four commercial Ag tests were able to detect at least 90.9% of Omicron-containing samples with high viral loads (Ct < 25). The rates of true-positive test results for BA.1/BA.2-positive samples with intermediate viral loads (Ct 25-30) ranged between 6.7% and 100.0%, while they dropped to 0 to 15.4% for samples with low Ct values (> 30). This heterogeneity was reflected also by the tests' 50%-limit of detection (LoD50) values ranging from 44,444 to 1,866,900 Geq/ml. Respiratory samples containing Omicron-BQ.1/XBB.1.5 or other Omicron subvariants that emerged in 2023 were detected with enormous heterogeneity (0 to 100%) for the intermediate and low viral load ranges with LoD50 values between 23,019 and 1,152,048 Geq/ml. In contrast, detection of "non-Omicron" samples was more sensitive, scoring positive in 35 to 100% for the intermediate and 1.3 to 32.9% of cases for the low viral loads, respectively, corresponding to LoD50 values ranging from 6181 to 749,792 Geq/ml. All four assays detected cell culture-expanded VoCs Alpha, Beta, Delta and Omicron subvariants carrying up to six amino acid mutations in the nucleocapsid protein with sensitivities comparable to the non-VoC EU-1. Overall, automated quantitative SARS-CoV-2 Ag assays are not more sensitive than standard rapid antigen tests used in POC settings and show a high heterogeneity in performance for VoC recognition. The best of these automated Ag tests may have the potential to complement nucleic acid-based assays for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics in settings not primarily focused on the protection of vulnerable groups. In light of the constant emergence of new Omicron subvariants and recombinants, most recently the XBB lineage, these tests' performance must be regularly re-evaluated, especially when new VoCs carry mutations in the nucleocapsid protein or immunological and clinical parameters change.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

自动化抗原测定显示,检测包括几个奥密克戎亚系在内的SARS-CoV-2变异毒株具有高度异质性。
直接病原体检测的诊断测试有助于遏制严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型(SARS-CoV-2)大流行。针对严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型的自动化、定量、实验室核衣壳抗原(Ag)检测已与基于核酸的检测系统和护理点(POC)侧流Ag检测一起启动。在这里,我们在自动化平台上评估了四种商业Ag测试,用于检测严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型奥密克戎变异株(VoC)(B.1.1.529)的不同亚系,与“非奥密克龙”VoC进行比较。从2022年2月至3月和2023年3月,共检测了203个奥密克戎PCR阳性呼吸道拭子(53个BA.1、48个BA.2、23个BQ.1、39个XBB.1.5和40个其他亚变体)。此外,对德尔塔(B.1.617.2)、奥密克戎BA.1、-BF.7、-BN.1和-BQ.1的组织培养扩增临床分离株进行了研究。将这些结果与之前报告的第二波疫情结束时(2021年2月至3月)的107个临床“非奥密克戎”样本以及野生型(wt)EU-1(B.1.177)、Alpha VoC(B.1.1.7)和Beta VoC(B.1351)的细胞培养衍生样本的数据进行了比较。所有四种商业Ag测试都能够检测到至少90.9%的高病毒载量(Ct  30)。这种异质性也反映在测试的50%检测限(LoD50)值上,范围为44444至1866900 Geq/ml。2023年出现的含有奥密克戎BQ.1/XBB.1.5或其他奥密克龙亚变体的呼吸道样本在中病毒载量和低病毒载量范围内被检测到具有巨大的异质性(0至100%),LoD50值在23019至1152048Geq/ml之间。相比之下,“非奥密克戎”样本的检测更为敏感,中间体的阳性率为35%至100%,低病毒载量的阳性率分别为1.3%至32.9%,对应于6181至749792 Geq/ml的LoD50值。所有四种测定都检测到细胞培养扩增的VoCs阿尔法、贝塔、德尔塔和奥密克戎亚变体,在核衣壳蛋白中携带多达六个氨基酸突变,其敏感性与非VoC EU-1相当。总体而言,自动化定量的严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型抗原检测并不比POC环境中使用的标准快速抗原检测更敏感,并且在VoC识别方面表现出高度的异质性。在不主要关注弱势群体保护的环境中,这些自动化Ag检测中最好的一种可能有可能补充基于核酸的检测,用于严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型诊断。鉴于新的奥密克戎亚变体和重组子的不断出现,最近的是XBB谱系,必须定期重新评估这些测试的性能,特别是当新的VOC携带核衣壳蛋白突变或免疫和临床参数发生变化时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Medical Microbiology and Immunology (MMIM) publishes key findings on all aspects of the interrelationship between infectious agents and the immune system of their hosts. The journal´s main focus is original research work on intrinsic, innate or adaptive immune responses to viral, bacterial, fungal and parasitic (protozoan and helminthic) infections and on the virulence of the respective infectious pathogens. MMIM covers basic, translational as well as clinical research in infectious diseases and infectious disease immunology. Basic research using cell cultures, organoid, and animal models are welcome, provided that the models have a clinical correlate and address a relevant medical question. The journal also considers manuscripts on the epidemiology of infectious diseases, including the emergence and epidemic spreading of pathogens and the development of resistance to anti-infective therapies, and on novel vaccines and other innovative measurements of prevention. The following categories of manuscripts will not be considered for publication in MMIM: submissions of preliminary work, of merely descriptive data sets without investigation of mechanisms or of limited global interest, manuscripts on existing or novel anti-infective compounds, which focus on pharmaceutical or pharmacological aspects of the drugs, manuscripts on existing or modified vaccines, unless they report on experimental or clinical efficacy studies or provide new immunological information on their mode of action, manuscripts on the diagnostics of infectious diseases, unless they offer a novel concept to solve a pending diagnostic problem, case reports or case series, unless they are embedded in a study that focuses on the anti-infectious immune response and/or on the virulence of a pathogen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信