Advancing translational research through the interface of digital phenotyping and neuroimaging: A narrative review

Q2 Medicine
Erica Camacho , Roscoe O. Brady Jr , Paulo Lizano , Matcheri Keshavan , John Torous
{"title":"Advancing translational research through the interface of digital phenotyping and neuroimaging: A narrative review","authors":"Erica Camacho ,&nbsp;Roscoe O. Brady Jr ,&nbsp;Paulo Lizano ,&nbsp;Matcheri Keshavan ,&nbsp;John Torous","doi":"10.1016/j.bionps.2021.100032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Instead of matching neuroimaging to static clinical targets, it is currently possible to use dynamic biobehavioral markers of cognition, functioning, behavior, and symptoms captured through a person’s smartphone. This paper reviews the published literature linking neuroimaging and smartphone data to understand the feasibility, methods, and potential of using smartphone sensing (often called digital phenotyping) as a target for neuroimaging. On June 30, 2020, a literature search was conducted on PubMed and PsycINFO for studies utilizing neuroimaging and smartphones tools. We excluded EEG focused studies, conference proceedings and abstracts. A snowball approach was applied to further locate papers. We utilized the NIMH’s Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework to organize results. 262 publications uncovered by the search were screened, and 14 papers were included in the final analysis. All studies differed in terms of the type of data collected from smartphones, type of neuroimaging used, areas of the brain measured, and population studied. The average duration before or after neuroimaging and smartphone assessments was 39 days. While it was not possible to directly compare studies, a majority of the included reports were classified under the Negative Valence Systems category in the RDoC framework. All studies reported statistically significant relationships between the information collected via the digital tool and the brain scans, and support feasibility of this method. The current literature connecting smartphone data and neuroimaging is nascent but holds the potential to better understand the ability of digital tools to inform brain structure and/or function. Although the protocols and studies from this search were heterogenous, results suggest feasibility and practicality of this work.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52767,"journal":{"name":"Biomarkers in Neuropsychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bionps.2021.100032","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomarkers in Neuropsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666144621000034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Instead of matching neuroimaging to static clinical targets, it is currently possible to use dynamic biobehavioral markers of cognition, functioning, behavior, and symptoms captured through a person’s smartphone. This paper reviews the published literature linking neuroimaging and smartphone data to understand the feasibility, methods, and potential of using smartphone sensing (often called digital phenotyping) as a target for neuroimaging. On June 30, 2020, a literature search was conducted on PubMed and PsycINFO for studies utilizing neuroimaging and smartphones tools. We excluded EEG focused studies, conference proceedings and abstracts. A snowball approach was applied to further locate papers. We utilized the NIMH’s Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework to organize results. 262 publications uncovered by the search were screened, and 14 papers were included in the final analysis. All studies differed in terms of the type of data collected from smartphones, type of neuroimaging used, areas of the brain measured, and population studied. The average duration before or after neuroimaging and smartphone assessments was 39 days. While it was not possible to directly compare studies, a majority of the included reports were classified under the Negative Valence Systems category in the RDoC framework. All studies reported statistically significant relationships between the information collected via the digital tool and the brain scans, and support feasibility of this method. The current literature connecting smartphone data and neuroimaging is nascent but holds the potential to better understand the ability of digital tools to inform brain structure and/or function. Although the protocols and studies from this search were heterogenous, results suggest feasibility and practicality of this work.

通过数字表型和神经成像的界面推进转化研究:叙述回顾
目前可以使用动态生物行为标记,通过智能手机捕捉认知、功能、行为和症状,而不是将神经成像与静态临床目标相匹配。本文回顾了将神经成像和智能手机数据联系起来的已发表文献,以了解使用智能手机传感(通常称为数字表型)作为神经成像目标的可行性、方法和潜力。2020年6月30日,在PubMed和PsycINFO上检索了利用神经成像和智能手机工具进行的研究的文献。我们排除了脑电图研究、会议记录和摘要。采用滚雪球的方法进一步查找文件。我们利用NIMH的研究领域标准(RDoC)框架来组织结果。筛选了检索中发现的262篇出版物,最终分析了14篇论文。所有的研究在从智能手机收集的数据类型、使用的神经成像类型、测量的大脑区域和研究的人群方面都有所不同。神经成像和智能手机评估前后的平均持续时间为39天。虽然不可能直接比较研究,但大多数纳入的报告都被归类为RDoC框架中的负价系统类别。所有研究都报告了通过数字工具收集的信息与脑部扫描之间的统计显著关系,并支持该方法的可行性。目前将智能手机数据和神经成像联系起来的文献还处于萌芽阶段,但有可能更好地理解数字工具为大脑结构和/或功能提供信息的能力。虽然这项研究的方案和研究是不同的,但结果表明这项工作的可行性和实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomarkers in Neuropsychiatry
Biomarkers in Neuropsychiatry Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信