{"title":"Cognition and Quality of Life of People with Spinal Cord Injury.","authors":"Ceri Houldsworth, Krishnan Padmakumari Sivaraman Nair, Ram Pankajam Hariharan","doi":"10.2490/prm.20230001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the cognitive abilities of people with spinal cord injury (SCI) using the Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavior Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Screen (ECAS), a tool designed for testing cognition in individuals with limited hand motor function. The impact of cognitive dysfunction on quality of life was also assessed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-one patients with SCI were assessed using ECAS, the brief version of the World Health Organisation Quality of Life questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF), and the Spinal Cord Independence Measure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 28 of the 41 participants scored below the cut-off threshold for normal population in ECAS. The domains affected were language, 63%; memory, 51%; executive function, 44%; verbal fluency, 44%; and visuospatial skills, 24%. On multiple regression analysis, the ECAS total score moderately strongly explained the variance in the WHOQOL-BREF psychological (β = 0.428, t = 2.958, P = 0.005) and environmental (β = 0.411, t = 2.819, P = 0.008) domains. ECAS memory scores independently influenced WHOQOL-BREF physical (β = 0.398, t = 2.67, P = 0.011) and environmental (β = 0.37, t = 2.697, P = 0.010) domains. WHOQOL-BREF psychological scores were significantly influenced by ECAS executive scores (β = 0.415, t = 2.85, P = 0.007), whereas the social domain was not significantly influenced by ECAS scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It was feasible to use ECAS in individuals with SCI. Cognitive ability influenced the quality of life of people with SCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":74584,"journal":{"name":"Progress in rehabilitation medicine","volume":"8 ","pages":"20230001"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/82/77/prm-8-20230001.PMC9836909.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in rehabilitation medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2490/prm.20230001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the cognitive abilities of people with spinal cord injury (SCI) using the Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavior Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Screen (ECAS), a tool designed for testing cognition in individuals with limited hand motor function. The impact of cognitive dysfunction on quality of life was also assessed.
Methods: Forty-one patients with SCI were assessed using ECAS, the brief version of the World Health Organisation Quality of Life questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF), and the Spinal Cord Independence Measure.
Results: Overall, 28 of the 41 participants scored below the cut-off threshold for normal population in ECAS. The domains affected were language, 63%; memory, 51%; executive function, 44%; verbal fluency, 44%; and visuospatial skills, 24%. On multiple regression analysis, the ECAS total score moderately strongly explained the variance in the WHOQOL-BREF psychological (β = 0.428, t = 2.958, P = 0.005) and environmental (β = 0.411, t = 2.819, P = 0.008) domains. ECAS memory scores independently influenced WHOQOL-BREF physical (β = 0.398, t = 2.67, P = 0.011) and environmental (β = 0.37, t = 2.697, P = 0.010) domains. WHOQOL-BREF psychological scores were significantly influenced by ECAS executive scores (β = 0.415, t = 2.85, P = 0.007), whereas the social domain was not significantly influenced by ECAS scores.
Conclusions: It was feasible to use ECAS in individuals with SCI. Cognitive ability influenced the quality of life of people with SCI.
目的:本研究的目的是使用爱丁堡认知和行为肌萎缩侧索硬化症筛查(ECAS)来评估脊髓损伤(SCI)患者的认知能力,ECAS是一种用于测试手部运动功能受限个体认知能力的工具。认知功能障碍对生活质量的影响也进行了评估。方法:采用ECAS、简易版世界卫生组织生活质量问卷(WHOQOL-BREF)和脊髓独立性量表对41例脊髓损伤患者进行评估。结果:总体而言,41名参与者中有28人在ECAS中得分低于正常人群的临界值。受影响的领域是语言,占63%;记忆,51%;执行功能,44%;语言流利度,44%;视觉空间技能,24%。多元回归分析显示,ECAS总分对WHOQOL-BREF心理(β = 0.428, t = 2.958, P = 0.005)和环境(β = 0.411, t = 2.819, P = 0.008)域的变异具有中等偏强的解释作用。ECAS记忆评分独立影响WHOQOL-BREF物理域(β = 0.398, t = 2.67, P = 0.011)和环境域(β = 0.37, t = 2.697, P = 0.010)。WHOQOL-BREF心理评分受ECAS执行评分影响显著(β = 0.415, t = 2.85, P = 0.007),而社会领域评分受ECAS评分影响不显著。结论:在脊髓损伤患者中应用ECAS是可行的。认知能力影响脊髓损伤患者的生活质量。