Validation of the brief Adjustment Disorder New Modules with Australian oncology patients.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Bernadette E Harris, Kylie Rice, Clara V Murray, Einar B Thorsteinsson
{"title":"Validation of the brief Adjustment Disorder New Modules with Australian oncology patients.","authors":"Bernadette E Harris,&nbsp;Kylie Rice,&nbsp;Clara V Murray,&nbsp;Einar B Thorsteinsson","doi":"10.1186/s13030-022-00259-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence suggests that up to 30% of cancer patients may meet the criteria for adjustment disorder. However, no assessment instruments have been validated for use with cancer patients. The Adjustment Disorder New Module (ADNM)-8 and ADNM-4 are brief screening tools for adjustment disorder mapped directly to the new ICD-11 criteria. The aim of this study was to investigate the factor structure and validity of both instruments in an Australian sample of adult oncology patients.  METHODS: A total of 405 participants with a cancer diagnosis were recruited online from across Australia. Participants reported cancer-specific information, such as time since diagnosis, treatment stage, cancer stage, type of cancer, and the following questionnaires: 8-item Adjustment Disorder New Module (ADNM-8), the World Health Organisation Well-Being Index (WHO-5), and the short form Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21). The predictiveness of stressors was assessed using multiple regression analysis and the structure of the ADNM-8 and the ADNM-4 was tested using confirmatory factor analysis.  RESULTS: Six previously tested models were examined, and the results suggested a 2-factor structure reflecting the two ICD-11 diagnostic criteria clusters of preoccupation with the stressor and failure to adapt was a good fit for both scales. The ADNM-4 outperformed the longer version of the scale on numerous fit indices though the ADNM-8 and ADNM-4 were highly correlated. Correlations of both scales with the psychological distress scale, the stress subscale, and the wellbeing index indicated good construct validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results suggest that the ADNM-8 and ADNM-4 are useful screening tools for assessing adjustment disorder symptoms in cancer patients. The prompt screening of cancer patients encourages early intervention for those at risk of adaptation difficulties and informs research and clinical decisions regarding appropriate treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":9027,"journal":{"name":"BioPsychoSocial Medicine","volume":"17 1","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9875190/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioPsychoSocial Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13030-022-00259-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Evidence suggests that up to 30% of cancer patients may meet the criteria for adjustment disorder. However, no assessment instruments have been validated for use with cancer patients. The Adjustment Disorder New Module (ADNM)-8 and ADNM-4 are brief screening tools for adjustment disorder mapped directly to the new ICD-11 criteria. The aim of this study was to investigate the factor structure and validity of both instruments in an Australian sample of adult oncology patients.  METHODS: A total of 405 participants with a cancer diagnosis were recruited online from across Australia. Participants reported cancer-specific information, such as time since diagnosis, treatment stage, cancer stage, type of cancer, and the following questionnaires: 8-item Adjustment Disorder New Module (ADNM-8), the World Health Organisation Well-Being Index (WHO-5), and the short form Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21). The predictiveness of stressors was assessed using multiple regression analysis and the structure of the ADNM-8 and the ADNM-4 was tested using confirmatory factor analysis.  RESULTS: Six previously tested models were examined, and the results suggested a 2-factor structure reflecting the two ICD-11 diagnostic criteria clusters of preoccupation with the stressor and failure to adapt was a good fit for both scales. The ADNM-4 outperformed the longer version of the scale on numerous fit indices though the ADNM-8 and ADNM-4 were highly correlated. Correlations of both scales with the psychological distress scale, the stress subscale, and the wellbeing index indicated good construct validity.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that the ADNM-8 and ADNM-4 are useful screening tools for assessing adjustment disorder symptoms in cancer patients. The prompt screening of cancer patients encourages early intervention for those at risk of adaptation difficulties and informs research and clinical decisions regarding appropriate treatments.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

澳大利亚肿瘤患者简短调整障碍新模块的验证。
背景:有证据表明,高达30%的癌症患者可能符合适应障碍的标准。然而,尚无评估工具被证实可用于癌症患者。适应障碍新模块(ADNM)-8和ADNM-4是直接映射到新的ICD-11标准的适应障碍的简短筛选工具。本研究的目的是在澳大利亚成年肿瘤患者样本中调查这两种工具的因素结构和有效性。方法:从澳大利亚各地在线招募了405名癌症诊断的参与者。参与者报告癌症特异性信息,如自诊断以来的时间,治疗阶段,癌症分期,癌症类型,以及以下问卷:8项调整障碍新模块(ADNM-8),世界卫生组织幸福指数(WHO-5)和简短的抑郁焦虑和压力量表(DASS-21)。采用多元回归分析评估应激源的预测能力,采用验证性因子分析检验ADNM-8和ADNM-4的结构。结果:对六个先前测试过的模型进行了检查,结果表明,反映两个ICD-11诊断标准的两个因素结构,即对压力源的关注和适应失败,对两个量表都很适合。虽然ADNM-8和ADNM-4高度相关,但ADNM-4在许多拟合指标上都优于较长的版本。两个量表与心理困扰量表、压力子量表和幸福感指数的相关性均显示良好的构念效度。结论:我们的研究结果表明ADNM-8和ADNM-4是评估癌症患者适应障碍症状的有用筛选工具。癌症患者的及时筛查鼓励对那些有适应困难风险的患者进行早期干预,并为有关适当治疗的研究和临床决策提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BioPsychoSocial Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal that encompasses all aspects of the interrelationships between the biological, psychological, social, and behavioral factors of health and illness. BioPsychoSocial Medicine is the official journal of the Japanese Society of Psychosomatic Medicine, and publishes research on psychosomatic disorders and diseases that are characterized by objective organic changes and/or functional changes that could be induced, progressed, aggravated, or exacerbated by psychological, social, and/or behavioral factors and their associated psychosomatic treatments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信