Conduction Disturbances and Arrhythmia Risk After Septal Reduction Therapy with Alternative Agents: A Pilot Study with EVOH-DMSO and Systematic Review.
{"title":"Conduction Disturbances and Arrhythmia Risk After Septal Reduction Therapy with Alternative Agents: A Pilot Study with EVOH-DMSO and Systematic Review.","authors":"Serkan Asil, Kudret Aytemir","doi":"10.5543/tkda.2022.69570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE Surgical septal myectomy and alcohol septal ablation are recommended treatment modalities for alleviating Left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient in obstructive HCM. Alcohol septal ablation offers advantages over surgery in many ways. However, it is associated with some life-threatening complications. For this purpose, our center used alternative agents for septal artery embolization. This study compared and evaluated conduction system defects and arrhythmia risk after EVOH-DMSO septal ablation with other alternative agents and alcohol septal ablation. METHODS Twenty-five patients who received septal reduction therapy with EVOH-DMSO were analyzed retrospectively, and all non-alcoholic agent's septal ablation studies were systematically reviewed and compared. RESULTS Twenty-five patients (52% female; mean age: 55.8 ± 17.1) with symptomatic obstructive HCM were enrolled. The Peak LVOT gradient was significantly reduced after the procedure (68 vs. 20 mmHg; P <0.001). During the 12-month follow-up, no mortality occurred. The complete atrioventricular block was noted in 2 (8%) patients. The incidence of right bundle branch block (RBBB) increased after the procedure (pre-procedural 2 patients (8%), post-procedural 9 patients (36%) P = 0.002). On ECG and Holter monitorization, no sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia occurred during follow-up, and no change was found in the frequency of atrial fibrillation. We systematically compared EVOH-DMSO to other non-alcohol agents, and we found that EVOH-DMSO can cause conduction system problems more commonly than other non-alcohol agents. CONCLUSION EVOH-DMSO could cause conduction system problems more common than other non-alcohol agents but less than alcohol septal ablation.","PeriodicalId":46993,"journal":{"name":"Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi Arsivi-Archives of the Turkish Society of Cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi Arsivi-Archives of the Turkish Society of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5543/tkda.2022.69570","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Surgical septal myectomy and alcohol septal ablation are recommended treatment modalities for alleviating Left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient in obstructive HCM. Alcohol septal ablation offers advantages over surgery in many ways. However, it is associated with some life-threatening complications. For this purpose, our center used alternative agents for septal artery embolization. This study compared and evaluated conduction system defects and arrhythmia risk after EVOH-DMSO septal ablation with other alternative agents and alcohol septal ablation. METHODS Twenty-five patients who received septal reduction therapy with EVOH-DMSO were analyzed retrospectively, and all non-alcoholic agent's septal ablation studies were systematically reviewed and compared. RESULTS Twenty-five patients (52% female; mean age: 55.8 ± 17.1) with symptomatic obstructive HCM were enrolled. The Peak LVOT gradient was significantly reduced after the procedure (68 vs. 20 mmHg; P <0.001). During the 12-month follow-up, no mortality occurred. The complete atrioventricular block was noted in 2 (8%) patients. The incidence of right bundle branch block (RBBB) increased after the procedure (pre-procedural 2 patients (8%), post-procedural 9 patients (36%) P = 0.002). On ECG and Holter monitorization, no sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia occurred during follow-up, and no change was found in the frequency of atrial fibrillation. We systematically compared EVOH-DMSO to other non-alcohol agents, and we found that EVOH-DMSO can cause conduction system problems more commonly than other non-alcohol agents. CONCLUSION EVOH-DMSO could cause conduction system problems more common than other non-alcohol agents but less than alcohol septal ablation.
目的:外科室间隔肌切除术和酒精性室间隔消融是缓解梗阻性HCM左心室流出道(LVOT)梯度的推荐治疗方式。酒精性室间隔消融术在很多方面都比手术有优势。然而,它与一些危及生命的并发症有关。为此,本中心采用替代药物进行间隔动脉栓塞。本研究比较和评价了EVOH-DMSO室间隔消融术与其他替代药物和酒精消融术后传导系统缺损和心律失常的风险。方法:回顾性分析25例接受EVOH-DMSO治疗的室间隔缩小患者,系统回顾和比较所有非酒精性药物的室间隔消融研究。结果:25例患者(女性52%;平均年龄:55.8±17.1),伴有症状性阻塞性HCM。手术后LVOT峰值梯度显著降低(68 vs. 20 mmHg;结论:EVOH-DMSO引起的传导系统问题比其他非酒精药物更常见,但比酒精室间隔消融术少。