Evaluation of risk stratification and adherence to venous thromboembolism prophylaxis among hospitalized obstetric women: Retrospective case file review at East Jeddah Hospital during 2018-2019.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Ghadeer Mattar, Nada Al Sahafi, Lujain Al Hazmi, Nadia Al Hazmi, Hanaa Elsayed Abozeid, Intessar Sultan
{"title":"Evaluation of risk stratification and adherence to venous thromboembolism prophylaxis among hospitalized obstetric women: Retrospective case file review at East Jeddah Hospital during 2018-2019.","authors":"Ghadeer Mattar,&nbsp;Nada Al Sahafi,&nbsp;Lujain Al Hazmi,&nbsp;Nadia Al Hazmi,&nbsp;Hanaa Elsayed Abozeid,&nbsp;Intessar Sultan","doi":"10.4103/atm.atm_79_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is associated with substantial mortality as well as morbidity and is largely preventable among hospitalized obstetric women. However, thromboprophylaxis is underutilized in most hospitalized patients.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate VTE risk and adherence to local thromboprophylaxis protocol among hospitalized pre- and postnatal women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study was conducted at East Jeddah Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, in 2020. The electronic record database of the hospitalized pregnant Saudi women during the years 2018 and 2019 was reviewed. Based on the local hospital protocol, the risk stratification was reassessed by researchers, and the hospital adherence to the prophylaxis was reviewed separately for antenatal and postnatal women.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One thousand and ninety-five electronic records (539 antenatal and 556 postnatal) were reviewed. The postnatal group showed a significantly higher risk compared with an antenatal group (62.2% vs. 11.7%) (<i>P</i> = 0.000). There was a highly significant difference between risk categories assessment by the physicians and the researchers in both groups (<i>P</i> = 0.000). Thromboprophylaxis was overutilized in the low risk (5% heparin and 41.4% heparin and mechanical devices for antenatal and 17.08% heparin and 6.1% heparin and a mechanical device for the postnatal group) and underutilized in intermediate groups (50% no prophylaxis in antenatal and 51.5% mechanical devices in the postnatal group). There was less adherence to documentation in postnatal as compared to antenatal group (83.6% vs. 95%, <i>P</i> = 0.000) for risk documentation and 85.3% versus 91.5% for physician signature (<i>P</i> = 0.001). Thromboprophylaxis was ordered for 21.3% of antenatal (12.2 heparin, 3.5% mechanical, and 5.6% both) and 23.7% of postnatal patients (16.5 heparin, 2% mechanical, and 5.2% both). There were no reported VTE events or bleeding complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was a considerable VTE risk among hospitalized obstetric patients which peaked during the postnatal period. Physicians showed good compliance to local VTE protocol with no reported VTE events or drug-induced bleeding. However, the implementation of prophylaxis is associated with both under and overutilization. There is a need for increasing the physicians' awareness of optimizing VTE risk assessment and documentation for hospitalized obstetric patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50760,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Thoracic Medicine","volume":"17 2","pages":"94-101"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/93/92/ATM-17-94.PMC9150665.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Thoracic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/atm.atm_79_21","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is associated with substantial mortality as well as morbidity and is largely preventable among hospitalized obstetric women. However, thromboprophylaxis is underutilized in most hospitalized patients.

Objectives: To evaluate VTE risk and adherence to local thromboprophylaxis protocol among hospitalized pre- and postnatal women.

Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at East Jeddah Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, in 2020. The electronic record database of the hospitalized pregnant Saudi women during the years 2018 and 2019 was reviewed. Based on the local hospital protocol, the risk stratification was reassessed by researchers, and the hospital adherence to the prophylaxis was reviewed separately for antenatal and postnatal women.

Results: One thousand and ninety-five electronic records (539 antenatal and 556 postnatal) were reviewed. The postnatal group showed a significantly higher risk compared with an antenatal group (62.2% vs. 11.7%) (P = 0.000). There was a highly significant difference between risk categories assessment by the physicians and the researchers in both groups (P = 0.000). Thromboprophylaxis was overutilized in the low risk (5% heparin and 41.4% heparin and mechanical devices for antenatal and 17.08% heparin and 6.1% heparin and a mechanical device for the postnatal group) and underutilized in intermediate groups (50% no prophylaxis in antenatal and 51.5% mechanical devices in the postnatal group). There was less adherence to documentation in postnatal as compared to antenatal group (83.6% vs. 95%, P = 0.000) for risk documentation and 85.3% versus 91.5% for physician signature (P = 0.001). Thromboprophylaxis was ordered for 21.3% of antenatal (12.2 heparin, 3.5% mechanical, and 5.6% both) and 23.7% of postnatal patients (16.5 heparin, 2% mechanical, and 5.2% both). There were no reported VTE events or bleeding complications.

Conclusion: There was a considerable VTE risk among hospitalized obstetric patients which peaked during the postnatal period. Physicians showed good compliance to local VTE protocol with no reported VTE events or drug-induced bleeding. However, the implementation of prophylaxis is associated with both under and overutilization. There is a need for increasing the physicians' awareness of optimizing VTE risk assessment and documentation for hospitalized obstetric patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

评估住院产科妇女静脉血栓栓塞预防的风险分层和依从性:2018-2019年东吉达医院回顾性病例档案回顾
背景:静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)与大量死亡率和发病率相关,并且在住院产科妇女中很大程度上是可以预防的。然而,血栓预防在大多数住院患者中未得到充分利用。目的:评估住院产前和产后妇女静脉血栓栓塞风险和对局部血栓预防方案的依从性。方法:本回顾性研究于2020年在沙特阿拉伯吉达东吉达医院进行。回顾了2018年和2019年住院的沙特孕妇电子记录数据库。根据当地医院的协议,研究人员重新评估了风险分层,并对医院对产前和产后妇女的预防依从性进行了单独审查。结果:共收集电子病历995份,其中产前539份,产后556份。产后组的风险明显高于产前组(62.2% vs. 11.7%) (P = 0.000)。两组医生和研究人员评估的风险类别之间存在高度显著差异(P = 0.000)。低风险组(产前5%肝素和41.4%肝素和机械装置,产后组17.08%肝素和6.1%肝素和机械装置)血栓预防使用过度,中间组(产前50%没有预防,产后组51.5%机械装置)使用率不足。与产前组相比,产后组对风险记录的依从性较低(83.6%对95%,P = 0.000),对医生签名的依从性为85.3%对91.5% (P = 0.001)。21.3%的产前患者(12.2%肝素治疗,3.5%机械治疗,两者都有5.6%)和23.7%的产后患者(16.5%肝素治疗,2%机械治疗,两者都有5.2%)安排了血栓预防。没有静脉血栓栓塞事件或出血并发症的报道。结论:产科住院患者发生静脉血栓栓塞的风险较大,在产后达到高峰。医生表现出对局部静脉血栓栓塞方案的良好依从性,没有静脉血栓栓塞事件或药物性出血的报道。然而,预防措施的实施与用药不足和用药过度有关。有必要提高医生对优化静脉血栓栓塞风险评估和住院产科患者文件的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Thoracic Medicine
Annals of Thoracic Medicine CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal will cover studies related to multidisciplinary specialties of chest medicine, such as adult and pediatrics pulmonology, thoracic surgery, critical care medicine, respiratory care, transplantation, sleep medicine, related basic medical sciences, and more. The journal also features basic science, special reports, case reports, board review , and more. Editorials and communications to the editor that explore controversial issues and encourage further discussion by physicians dealing with chest medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信