Effects of sample matrix in the measurement of antithrombin by LC-MS: A role for immunocapture

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
M. Kruijt , N.P.M. Smit , J.J. van Ham , C.M. Cobbaert , L.R. Ruhaak
{"title":"Effects of sample matrix in the measurement of antithrombin by LC-MS: A role for immunocapture","authors":"M. Kruijt ,&nbsp;N.P.M. Smit ,&nbsp;J.J. van Ham ,&nbsp;C.M. Cobbaert ,&nbsp;L.R. Ruhaak","doi":"10.1016/j.jmsacl.2023.01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The sample matrix composition, which is greatly affected by the type of blood collection tube used during phlebotomy, is of major importance in laboratory testing as it can influence test results. We developed an LC-MRM-MS test to molecularly characterize antithrombin in citrate plasma. The test principle differs greatly from traditional laboratory tests and the influence of varying plasma sample matrices is largely unknown.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To identify whether variations in sample matrix affect the LC-MRM-MS test for antithrombin and assess whether sample pre-processing by immunocapture reduces matrix-specific effects.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Samples (n = 45) originating from four different blood collection tubes (sodium citrate, lithium heparin, K<sub>2</sub>-EDTA and K<sub>2</sub>-EDTA with protease inhibitors) were processed directly or after immunocapture. Antithrombin was digested into proteotypic peptides, which were monitored by LC-MRM-MS. Results from lithium heparin and the K<sub>2</sub>-EDTA matrices were compared to the standard sample matrix, sodium citrate, using Deming regression analysis and repeated measures one-way ANOVA.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Deming regression analysis of directly processed samples revealed slopes deviating &gt;5% from the line of identity for at least six out of 22 peptides in all matrices. Significant differences between all matrices were found upon analysis by ANOVA for at least 10 peptides. Pre-processing by immunocapture led to slopes within 5% of the line of identity for nearly all peptides of the matrices. Furthermore, significant differences between matrices after immunocapture were only observed for four peptides.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Variations in the sample matrix affect the measurement of antithrombin by LC-MRM-MS, but observed effects are greatly reduced upon pre-processing by immunocapture.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52406,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/14/17/main.PMC9860377.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667145X23000020","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction

The sample matrix composition, which is greatly affected by the type of blood collection tube used during phlebotomy, is of major importance in laboratory testing as it can influence test results. We developed an LC-MRM-MS test to molecularly characterize antithrombin in citrate plasma. The test principle differs greatly from traditional laboratory tests and the influence of varying plasma sample matrices is largely unknown.

Objectives

To identify whether variations in sample matrix affect the LC-MRM-MS test for antithrombin and assess whether sample pre-processing by immunocapture reduces matrix-specific effects.

Methods

Samples (n = 45) originating from four different blood collection tubes (sodium citrate, lithium heparin, K2-EDTA and K2-EDTA with protease inhibitors) were processed directly or after immunocapture. Antithrombin was digested into proteotypic peptides, which were monitored by LC-MRM-MS. Results from lithium heparin and the K2-EDTA matrices were compared to the standard sample matrix, sodium citrate, using Deming regression analysis and repeated measures one-way ANOVA.

Results

Deming regression analysis of directly processed samples revealed slopes deviating >5% from the line of identity for at least six out of 22 peptides in all matrices. Significant differences between all matrices were found upon analysis by ANOVA for at least 10 peptides. Pre-processing by immunocapture led to slopes within 5% of the line of identity for nearly all peptides of the matrices. Furthermore, significant differences between matrices after immunocapture were only observed for four peptides.

Conclusion

Variations in the sample matrix affect the measurement of antithrombin by LC-MRM-MS, but observed effects are greatly reduced upon pre-processing by immunocapture.

Abstract Image

样品基质对LC-MS测定抗凝血酶的影响:免疫捕获的作用
引言样本基质成分在很大程度上受静脉切开术中使用的采血管类型的影响,在实验室检测中具有重要意义,因为它会影响检测结果。我们开发了一种LC-MRM-MS测试方法来对柠檬酸盐血浆中的抗凝血酶进行分子表征。测试原理与传统的实验室测试有很大不同,不同血浆样品基质的影响在很大程度上是未知的。目的确定样品基质的变化是否会影响LC-MRM-MS抗凝血酶测试,并评估免疫捕获预处理样品是否会降低基质特异性效应。方法对来源于四种不同采血管(柠檬酸钠、肝素锂、K2-EDTA和K2-EDTA-蛋白酶抑制剂)的样品(n=45)进行直接或免疫捕获处理。抗凝血酶被消化成蛋白型肽,并通过LC-MRM-MS进行监测。使用德明回归分析和重复测量单因素方差分析将肝素锂和K2-EDTA基质的结果与标准样品基质柠檬酸钠进行比较;在所有基质中的22个肽中的至少6个肽的同一性线的5%。通过ANOVA对至少10个肽进行分析,发现所有基质之间存在显著差异。免疫捕获的预处理导致基质的几乎所有肽的斜率在同一性线的5%以内。此外,仅对四种肽观察到免疫捕获后基质之间的显著差异。结论样品基质的变化影响LC-MRM-MS测定抗凝血酶,但免疫捕获预处理后观察到的效果大大降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab
Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab Health Professions-Medical Laboratory Technology
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
41
审稿时长
81 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信