Reflective practice and psychotherapy case experience of Specialty Doctors and Associate Specialists (SAS) working in psychiatry: UK-wide survey.

IF 2.2 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Alina Vaida, Masud Awal
{"title":"Reflective practice and psychotherapy case experience of Specialty Doctors and Associate Specialists (SAS) working in psychiatry: UK-wide survey.","authors":"Alina Vaida, Masud Awal","doi":"10.1192/bjb.2022.96","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims and method: </strong>To survey nationwide opportunities for Balint-type and reflective support group participation and psychotherapy training among doctors classified as Specialty Doctors and Associate Specialists in psychiatry ('SAS psychiatrists') and the professional benefits and barriers to access.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately 9% of SAS psychiatrists responded, from all UK regions. A minority reported participating in a Balint-type group (27.3%) or reflective practice/support group (30.9%), and only 6.5% were not interested in participating. Although 44.8% planned to see a psychotherapy case, most reported barriers, particularly time constraints, job plans and lack of support. The 22.1% who reported already gaining psychotherapy case experience reported many benefits, including becoming a better listener (84.8%), more empathetic (81.2%), enjoying work more (78.8%) and overall becoming a better psychiatrist (90.9%).</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>The reported interest in Balint group and psychotherapy training opportunities exceeded existing provision; psychotherapy case experience benefited professional development and self-reported clinical capabilities. Healthcare trusts and boards need to consider more actively supporting SAS psychotherapy training and reflective practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":8883,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Bulletin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10801411/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2022.96","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims and method: To survey nationwide opportunities for Balint-type and reflective support group participation and psychotherapy training among doctors classified as Specialty Doctors and Associate Specialists in psychiatry ('SAS psychiatrists') and the professional benefits and barriers to access.

Results: Approximately 9% of SAS psychiatrists responded, from all UK regions. A minority reported participating in a Balint-type group (27.3%) or reflective practice/support group (30.9%), and only 6.5% were not interested in participating. Although 44.8% planned to see a psychotherapy case, most reported barriers, particularly time constraints, job plans and lack of support. The 22.1% who reported already gaining psychotherapy case experience reported many benefits, including becoming a better listener (84.8%), more empathetic (81.2%), enjoying work more (78.8%) and overall becoming a better psychiatrist (90.9%).

Clinical implications: The reported interest in Balint group and psychotherapy training opportunities exceeded existing provision; psychotherapy case experience benefited professional development and self-reported clinical capabilities. Healthcare trusts and boards need to consider more actively supporting SAS psychotherapy training and reflective practice.

从事精神病学工作的专科医生和副专科医生(SAS)的反思实践和心理治疗案例经验:英国范围内的调查。
目的和方法:调查全国范围内被归类为精神病学专科医生和副专科医生("SAS 精神科医生")的医生参与巴林式和反思性支持小组以及接受心理治疗培训的机会,以及获得这些机会的专业益处和障碍:约有 9% 的 SAS 精神科医生做出了回应,他们来自英国所有地区。少数人表示参加了巴林式小组(27.3%)或反思性实践/支持小组(30.9%),只有 6.5% 的人表示没有兴趣参加。尽管 44.8%的人计划去看心理治疗个案,但大多数人表示存在障碍,特别是时间限制、工作计划和缺乏支持。22.1%的受访者表示已经获得了心理治疗案例经验,并表示受益良多,包括成为更好的倾听者(84.8%)、更富有同情心(81.2%)、更喜欢工作(78.8%)以及总体上成为更好的精神科医生(90.9%):临床影响:据报告,对巴林特小组和心理治疗培训机会的兴趣超过了现有的培训机会;心理治疗案例经验有利于专业发展和自我临床能力的提高。医疗机构和董事会需要考虑更积极地支持SAS心理治疗培训和反思性实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJPsych Bulletin
BJPsych Bulletin PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
79
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: BJPsych Bulletin prioritises research, opinion and informed reflection on the state of psychiatry, management of psychiatric services, and education and training in psychiatry. It provides essential reading and practical value to psychiatrists and anyone involved in the management and provision of mental healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信