Demonstrative systems: From linguistic typology to social cognition

IF 3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY
Paula Rubio-Fernandez
{"title":"Demonstrative systems: From linguistic typology to social cognition","authors":"Paula Rubio-Fernandez","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2022.101519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study explores the connection between language and social cognition by empirically testing different typological analyses of various demonstrative systems. Linguistic typology classifies demonstrative systems as <em>distance-oriented</em> or <em>person-oriented</em>, depending on whether they indicate the location of a referent relative only to the speaker, or to both the speaker and the listener. From the perspective of social cognition, speakers of languages with person-oriented systems must monitor their listener’s spatial location in order to accurately use their demonstratives, while speakers of languages with distance-oriented systems can use demonstratives from their own, egocentric perspective. Resolving an ongoing controversy around the nature of the Spanish demonstrative system, the results of Experiment 1 confirmed that this demonstrative system is person oriented, while the English system is distance oriented. Experiment 2 revealed that not all three-way demonstrative systems are person oriented, with Japanese speakers showing sensitivity to the listener’s spatial location, while Turkish speakers did not show such an effect in their demonstrative choice. In Experiment 3, Catalan-Spanish bilinguals showed sensitivity to listener position in their choice of the Spanish distal form, but not in their choice of the medial form. These results were interpreted as a transfer effect from Catalan, which revealed analogous results to English. Experiment 4 investigated the use of demonstratives to redirect a listener’s attention to the intended referent, which is a universal function of demonstratives that also hinges on social cognition. Japanese and Spanish speakers chose between their proximal and distal demonstratives flexibly, depending on whether the listener was looking closer or further from the referent, whereas Turkish speakers chose their medial form for attention correction. In conclusion, the results of this study support the view that investigating how speakers of different languages jointly use language and social cognition in communication has the potential to unravel the deep connection between these two fundamentally human capacities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50669,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Psychology","volume":"139 ","pages":"Article 101519"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001002852200055X/pdfft?md5=162ec6489bcf03327eb6f37984527fee&pid=1-s2.0-S001002852200055X-main.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001002852200055X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study explores the connection between language and social cognition by empirically testing different typological analyses of various demonstrative systems. Linguistic typology classifies demonstrative systems as distance-oriented or person-oriented, depending on whether they indicate the location of a referent relative only to the speaker, or to both the speaker and the listener. From the perspective of social cognition, speakers of languages with person-oriented systems must monitor their listener’s spatial location in order to accurately use their demonstratives, while speakers of languages with distance-oriented systems can use demonstratives from their own, egocentric perspective. Resolving an ongoing controversy around the nature of the Spanish demonstrative system, the results of Experiment 1 confirmed that this demonstrative system is person oriented, while the English system is distance oriented. Experiment 2 revealed that not all three-way demonstrative systems are person oriented, with Japanese speakers showing sensitivity to the listener’s spatial location, while Turkish speakers did not show such an effect in their demonstrative choice. In Experiment 3, Catalan-Spanish bilinguals showed sensitivity to listener position in their choice of the Spanish distal form, but not in their choice of the medial form. These results were interpreted as a transfer effect from Catalan, which revealed analogous results to English. Experiment 4 investigated the use of demonstratives to redirect a listener’s attention to the intended referent, which is a universal function of demonstratives that also hinges on social cognition. Japanese and Spanish speakers chose between their proximal and distal demonstratives flexibly, depending on whether the listener was looking closer or further from the referent, whereas Turkish speakers chose their medial form for attention correction. In conclusion, the results of this study support the view that investigating how speakers of different languages jointly use language and social cognition in communication has the potential to unravel the deep connection between these two fundamentally human capacities.

示范系统:从语言类型学到社会认知
本研究通过实证检验不同的表征系统的类型分析,探讨语言与社会认知之间的联系。语言类型学将指示系统分为以距离为导向的或以人为导向的,这取决于它们是只指示指示物相对于说话者的位置,还是指示指示物相对于说话者和听者的位置。从社会认知的角度来看,以人为导向的语言的说话者必须监控听者的空间位置,才能准确地使用指示语,而以距离为导向的语言的说话者则可以从自己的、自我中心的角度来使用指示语。为了解决围绕西班牙语示范系统性质的持续争议,实验1的结果证实了西班牙语示范系统是以人为导向的,而英语示范系统是以距离为导向的。实验2显示,并非所有的三向指示系统都是以人为导向的,日语使用者对听者的空间位置表现出敏感性,而土耳其语使用者在指示选择上没有表现出这种影响。在实验3中,加泰罗尼亚-西班牙双语者在选择西班牙语远端形式时对听者位置表现出敏感性,而在选择中端形式时则没有。这些结果被解释为加泰罗尼亚语的迁移效应,这揭示了与英语相似的结果。实验4研究了指示语的使用将听者的注意力转移到预期所指上,这是指示语的普遍功能,也取决于社会认知。说日语和西班牙语的人可以根据听者看得离指称物更近还是更远,灵活地选择近端指示语和远端指示语,而说土耳其语的人则选择中间指示语进行注意力纠正。总之,本研究的结果支持这样一种观点,即调查不同语言的使用者如何在交流中共同使用语言和社会认知,有可能揭示这两种基本人类能力之间的深层联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cognitive Psychology
Cognitive Psychology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
29
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Cognitive Psychology is concerned with advances in the study of attention, memory, language processing, perception, problem solving, and thinking. Cognitive Psychology specializes in extensive articles that have a major impact on cognitive theory and provide new theoretical advances. Research Areas include: • Artificial intelligence • Developmental psychology • Linguistics • Neurophysiology • Social psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信