Ultrasound-guided Greater Occipital Nerve Block in Children Undergoing Posterior Fossa Craniotomy: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

IF 2.3 2区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Heba Nassar, Khaled Sarhan, Maha Gamil, Manal Elgohary, Hany El-Hadi, Sahar Mahmoud
{"title":"Ultrasound-guided Greater Occipital Nerve Block in Children Undergoing Posterior Fossa Craniotomy: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.","authors":"Heba Nassar, Khaled Sarhan, Maha Gamil, Manal Elgohary, Hany El-Hadi, Sahar Mahmoud","doi":"10.1097/ANA.0000000000000899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Posterior fossa surgery is commonly associated with severe postoperative pain. This study assessed the impact of ultrasound-guided greater occipital nerve (GON) block on postoperative pain and hemodynamic profiles in pediatric posterior fossa craniotomy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Children aged 2 to 12 years undergoing elective posterior fossa craniotomy with general anesthesia were randomly allocated to a control group receiving standard care (n=18) or a GON block group receiving standard care plus bilateral ultrasound-guided GON block (=17). Outcomes were postoperative pain assessed using the objective pain scale, time to first postoperative analgesia, intraoperative fentanyl consumption, perioperative blood pressure and heart rate, incidence of nausea and vomiting, and nerve-block-related complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Objective pain scale scores were lower in the GON block group than in the control group at 2, 4, 6, 8 (all P =0.0001), 12 ( P =0.001), 16 ( P =0.03), and 24-hour ( P =0.004) postoperatively. The time to first analgesic request was 13.4±7.4 hours in the GON block group and 1.8±1.5 hours in the control group ( P <0.001). Intraoperative fentanyl consumption was 2.68±0.53 μg/kg -1 in the GON block group and 4.1±0.53 μg/kg -1 in the control group ( P =0.0001). Systolic blood pressure was lower in the GON block group at several intraoperative and postoperative time points, whereas heart rate was similar in the two groups at most time points. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was similar between groups ( P =0.38), and there were no nerve-block-related complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In children undergoing posterior fossa craniotomy, GON block was associated with superior quality and duration of postoperative analgesia and better hemodynamic profile compared with standard care.</p>","PeriodicalId":16550,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"159-163"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANA.0000000000000899","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Posterior fossa surgery is commonly associated with severe postoperative pain. This study assessed the impact of ultrasound-guided greater occipital nerve (GON) block on postoperative pain and hemodynamic profiles in pediatric posterior fossa craniotomy.

Materials and methods: Children aged 2 to 12 years undergoing elective posterior fossa craniotomy with general anesthesia were randomly allocated to a control group receiving standard care (n=18) or a GON block group receiving standard care plus bilateral ultrasound-guided GON block (=17). Outcomes were postoperative pain assessed using the objective pain scale, time to first postoperative analgesia, intraoperative fentanyl consumption, perioperative blood pressure and heart rate, incidence of nausea and vomiting, and nerve-block-related complications.

Results: Objective pain scale scores were lower in the GON block group than in the control group at 2, 4, 6, 8 (all P =0.0001), 12 ( P =0.001), 16 ( P =0.03), and 24-hour ( P =0.004) postoperatively. The time to first analgesic request was 13.4±7.4 hours in the GON block group and 1.8±1.5 hours in the control group ( P <0.001). Intraoperative fentanyl consumption was 2.68±0.53 μg/kg -1 in the GON block group and 4.1±0.53 μg/kg -1 in the control group ( P =0.0001). Systolic blood pressure was lower in the GON block group at several intraoperative and postoperative time points, whereas heart rate was similar in the two groups at most time points. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was similar between groups ( P =0.38), and there were no nerve-block-related complications.

Conclusions: In children undergoing posterior fossa craniotomy, GON block was associated with superior quality and duration of postoperative analgesia and better hemodynamic profile compared with standard care.

超声引导下对接受后窝开颅手术儿童的大枕神经阻滞:随机对照试验。
背景:后窝手术通常伴有严重的术后疼痛。本研究评估了超声引导下枕大神经(GON)阻滞对小儿后窝开颅手术术后疼痛和血流动力学特征的影响:将接受选择性后窝开颅手术并进行全身麻醉的 2 至 12 岁儿童随机分配到接受标准护理的对照组(18 人)或接受标准护理加双侧超声引导下枕大神经阻滞的枕大神经阻滞组(17 人)。结果是使用客观疼痛量表评估术后疼痛、首次术后镇痛时间、术中芬太尼用量、围术期血压和心率、恶心和呕吐发生率以及神经阻滞相关并发症:术后2、4、6、8(均为P=0.0001)、12(P=0.001)、16(P=0.03)和24小时(P=0.004),GON阻滞组的客观疼痛量表评分均低于对照组。GON阻滞组首次要求镇痛的时间为(13.4±7.4)小时,对照组为(1.8±1.5)小时(P 结论:GON阻滞组和对照组的首次镇痛时间分别为(13.4±7.4)小时和(1.8±1.5)小时:在接受后窝开颅手术的儿童中,与标准护理相比,GON阻滞的术后镇痛质量更高、持续时间更长、血液动力学状况更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
10.80%
发文量
119
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology (JNA) is a peer-reviewed publication directed to an audience of neuroanesthesiologists, neurosurgeons, neurosurgical monitoring specialists, neurosurgical support staff, and Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit personnel. The journal publishes original peer-reviewed studies in the form of Clinical Investigations, Laboratory Investigations, Clinical Reports, Review Articles, Journal Club synopses of current literature from related journals, presentation of Points of View on controversial issues, Book Reviews, Correspondence, and Abstracts from affiliated neuroanesthesiology societies. JNA is the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care, the Neuroanaesthesia and Critical Care Society of Great Britain and Ireland, the Association de Neuro-Anesthésiologie Réanimation de langue Française, the Wissenschaftlicher Arbeitskreis Neuroanästhesie der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizen, the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutschsprachiger Neuroanästhesisten und Neuro-Intensivmediziner, the Korean Society of Neuroanesthesia, the Japanese Society of Neuroanesthesia and Critical Care, the Neuroanesthesiology Chapter of the Colegio Mexicano de Anesthesiología, the Indian Society of Neuroanesthesiology and Critical Care, and the Thai Society for Neuroanesthesia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信