Effect of repolishing on the discoloration of indirect composite block, nanohybrid, and microhybrid resin composites.

IF 0.9 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Muhittin Ugurlu
{"title":"Effect of repolishing on the discoloration of indirect composite block, nanohybrid, and microhybrid resin composites.","authors":"Muhittin Ugurlu","doi":"10.26650/eor.20221066456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To comparatively assess the color stability of indirect composite block, nanohybrid, and microhybrid resin composites after immersion in red wine and repolishing.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Specimens (2x7x12 mm) were prepared using an indirect composite block (Cerasmart), a nanohybrid (Ceram X), and a microhybrid (Charisma Smart) resin composite. The specimens' color was recorded based on the CIE L*a*b* system in a spectrophotometer (Spectroshade). After recording the initial color, the specimens were immersed in red wine for 3 hours per day for 15 days. The color measurement was done again. The specimens were repolished with a multistep polishing system (SuperSnap). The color was measured for the third time. The color change values (ΔE) were calculated with the L*, a*, and b* coordinates obtained at baseline, after the immersion procedure, and after repolishing. Statistical analyses were performed with one-way ANOVA, Tukey's post hoc, and paired t-tests (p=0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The composite block presented the lowest ΔE value (p <0.05). No statistically significant difference was found between the ΔE values of the nanohybrid and microhybrid resin composites. The repolishing promoted a decrease in the color change of all three materials (p<0.05). The ΔE value of the composite block was clinically acceptable after repolishing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The composite block showed higher color stability. The staining resistance of the nanohybrid and microhybrid resin composites was not different. The repolishing decreased the discoloration of all three materials.</p>","PeriodicalId":41993,"journal":{"name":"European Oral Research","volume":"56 3","pages":"158-163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3d/61/eor-056-158.PMC9826705.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Oral Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20221066456","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: To comparatively assess the color stability of indirect composite block, nanohybrid, and microhybrid resin composites after immersion in red wine and repolishing.

Materials and methods: Specimens (2x7x12 mm) were prepared using an indirect composite block (Cerasmart), a nanohybrid (Ceram X), and a microhybrid (Charisma Smart) resin composite. The specimens' color was recorded based on the CIE L*a*b* system in a spectrophotometer (Spectroshade). After recording the initial color, the specimens were immersed in red wine for 3 hours per day for 15 days. The color measurement was done again. The specimens were repolished with a multistep polishing system (SuperSnap). The color was measured for the third time. The color change values (ΔE) were calculated with the L*, a*, and b* coordinates obtained at baseline, after the immersion procedure, and after repolishing. Statistical analyses were performed with one-way ANOVA, Tukey's post hoc, and paired t-tests (p=0.05).

Results: The composite block presented the lowest ΔE value (p <0.05). No statistically significant difference was found between the ΔE values of the nanohybrid and microhybrid resin composites. The repolishing promoted a decrease in the color change of all three materials (p<0.05). The ΔE value of the composite block was clinically acceptable after repolishing.

Conclusion: The composite block showed higher color stability. The staining resistance of the nanohybrid and microhybrid resin composites was not different. The repolishing decreased the discoloration of all three materials.

Abstract Image

再抛光对间接复合块、纳米杂化和微杂化树脂复合材料变色的影响。
目的:比较评价间接复合块、纳米杂化和微杂化树脂复合材料在红酒浸泡和再抛光后的颜色稳定性。材料和方法:采用间接复合块(Cerasmart)、纳米杂化(Ceram X)和微杂化(Charisma Smart)树脂复合材料制备样品(2x7x12 mm)。在分光光度计(Spectroshade)上根据CIE L*a*b*系统记录样品的颜色。记录初始颜色后,将标本浸泡在红酒中,每天浸泡3小时,共15天。再次进行颜色测量。用多步抛光系统(SuperSnap)对样品进行重新抛光。第三次测量颜色。颜色变化值(ΔE)是用在基线、浸泡后和重新抛光后获得的L*、a*和b*坐标计算的。统计学分析采用单因素方差分析、Tukey事后检验和配对t检验(p=0.05)。结果:复合色块的ΔE值最低(p)。结论:复合色块具有较高的颜色稳定性。纳米杂化树脂和微杂化树脂复合材料的耐染色性能无明显差异。再抛光降低了所有三种材料的变色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Oral Research
European Oral Research DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信