The Microbial Etiology of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Adults: from Classical Bacteriology to Host Transcriptional Signatures.

IF 19 1区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY
Clinical Microbiology Reviews Pub Date : 2022-12-21 Epub Date: 2022-09-27 DOI:10.1128/cmr.00015-22
Naomi J Gadsby, Daniel M Musher
{"title":"The Microbial Etiology of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Adults: from Classical Bacteriology to Host Transcriptional Signatures.","authors":"Naomi J Gadsby,&nbsp;Daniel M Musher","doi":"10.1128/cmr.00015-22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>All modern advances notwithstanding, pneumonia remains a common infection with substantial morbidity and mortality. Understanding of the etiology of pneumonia continues to evolve as new techniques enable identification of already known organisms and as new organisms emerge. We now review the etiology of pneumonia (at present often called \"community-acquired pneumonia\") beginning with classic bacteriologic techniques, which identified Streptococcus pneumoniae as the overwhelmingly common cause, to more modern bacteriologic studies, which emphasize Haemophilus influenzae, Staphylococcus aureus, Moraxella catarrhalis, <i>Enterobacteriaceae</i>, Pseudomonas, and normal respiratory flora. Urine antigen detection is useful in identifying <i>Legionella</i> and pneumococcus. The low yield of bacteria in recent studies is due to the failure to obtain valid sputum samples before antibiotics are administered. The use of high-quality sputum specimens enables identification of recognized (\"typical\") bacterial pathogens as well as a role for commensal bacteria (\"normal respiratory flora\"). Nucleic acid amplification technology for viruses has revolutionized diagnosis, showing the importance of viral pneumonia leading to hospitalization with or without coinfecting bacterial organisms. Quantitative PCR study of sputum is in its early stages of application, but regular detection of high counts of bacterial DNA from organisms that are not seen on Gram stain or grown in quantitative culture presents a therapeutic dilemma. This finding may reflect the host microbiome of the respiratory tract, in which case treatment may not need to be given for them. Finally, host transcriptional signatures might enable clinicians to distinguish between viral and bacterial pneumonia, an important practical consideration.</p>","PeriodicalId":10378,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Microbiology Reviews","volume":"35 4","pages":"e0001522"},"PeriodicalIF":19.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9769922/pdf/cmr.00015-22.pdf","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Microbiology Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.00015-22","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

All modern advances notwithstanding, pneumonia remains a common infection with substantial morbidity and mortality. Understanding of the etiology of pneumonia continues to evolve as new techniques enable identification of already known organisms and as new organisms emerge. We now review the etiology of pneumonia (at present often called "community-acquired pneumonia") beginning with classic bacteriologic techniques, which identified Streptococcus pneumoniae as the overwhelmingly common cause, to more modern bacteriologic studies, which emphasize Haemophilus influenzae, Staphylococcus aureus, Moraxella catarrhalis, Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas, and normal respiratory flora. Urine antigen detection is useful in identifying Legionella and pneumococcus. The low yield of bacteria in recent studies is due to the failure to obtain valid sputum samples before antibiotics are administered. The use of high-quality sputum specimens enables identification of recognized ("typical") bacterial pathogens as well as a role for commensal bacteria ("normal respiratory flora"). Nucleic acid amplification technology for viruses has revolutionized diagnosis, showing the importance of viral pneumonia leading to hospitalization with or without coinfecting bacterial organisms. Quantitative PCR study of sputum is in its early stages of application, but regular detection of high counts of bacterial DNA from organisms that are not seen on Gram stain or grown in quantitative culture presents a therapeutic dilemma. This finding may reflect the host microbiome of the respiratory tract, in which case treatment may not need to be given for them. Finally, host transcriptional signatures might enable clinicians to distinguish between viral and bacterial pneumonia, an important practical consideration.

成人社区获得性肺炎的微生物病因:从经典细菌学到宿主转录特征。
尽管取得了所有现代进步,肺炎仍然是一种常见的感染,发病率和死亡率都很高。随着新技术能够识别已知的生物体和新生物体的出现,对肺炎病因的理解不断发展。我们现在回顾肺炎(目前通常称为“社区获得性肺炎”)的病因,从确定肺炎链球菌为绝大多数常见病因的经典细菌学技术,到强调流感嗜血杆菌、金黄色葡萄球菌、卡他莫拉菌、肠杆菌科、假单胞菌、,以及正常的呼吸道菌群。尿液抗原检测可用于识别军团菌和肺炎球菌。在最近的研究中,细菌产量低是由于在使用抗生素之前未能获得有效的痰液样本。使用高质量的痰标本可以识别公认的(“典型”)细菌病原体以及共生细菌(“正常呼吸道菌群”)的作用。用于病毒的核酸扩增技术已经彻底改变了诊断,显示了病毒性肺炎导致住院的重要性,无论是否感染细菌。痰的定量PCR研究正处于应用的早期阶段,但定期检测革兰氏染色剂上未发现或在定量培养中生长的生物体中的高计数细菌DNA是一个治疗难题。这一发现可能反映了呼吸道的宿主微生物组,在这种情况下,可能不需要对其进行治疗。最后,宿主转录特征可能使临床医生能够区分病毒性肺炎和细菌性肺炎,这是一个重要的实际考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Clinical Microbiology Reviews 医学-微生物学
CiteScore
54.20
自引率
0.50%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Clinical Microbiology Reviews (CMR) is a journal that primarily focuses on clinical microbiology and immunology.It aims to provide readers with up-to-date information on the latest developments in these fields.CMR also presents the current state of knowledge in clinical microbiology and immunology.Additionally, the journal offers balanced and thought-provoking perspectives on controversial issues in these areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信