Perceived Stress and Frailty in Older Adults.

IF 2.8 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-14 DOI:10.4235/agmr.23.0132
Se Hui Lee, Jinyoung Shin, Sarang Um, Hye Ri Shin, Young Sun Kim, Jae Kyung Choi
{"title":"Perceived Stress and Frailty in Older Adults.","authors":"Se Hui Lee, Jinyoung Shin, Sarang Um, Hye Ri Shin, Young Sun Kim, Jae Kyung Choi","doi":"10.4235/agmr.23.0132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals with frailty are susceptible to adverse events. Although a psychological correlation with frailty has been observed, few studies have investigated the link between stress and frailty. This study examined the association between perceived stress and frailty in older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional observational study included participants recruited between September 2021 and January 2022. The Korean version of the Perceived Stress Scale-10 was used to measure stress levels, while the frailty status was assessed using the Korean Frailty Index. Loneliness, depression, and satisfaction were measured using the UCLA Loneliness Scale, Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale, and Satisfaction with Life Scale, respectively. We used multinomial logistic regression to compare the variables between frail and robust participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 862 study participants (mean age, 73.62 years; 65.5% women), the mean PSS-10 score was 15.26, 10.8% were frail, 22.4% were pre-frail, and 66.8% were robust. Perceived stress was significantly associated with pre-frailty (crude odds ratio [OR]=1.147; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.093-1.204) and frailty (crude OR=1.417; 95% CI, 1.322-1.520). After adjusting for sociodemographic factors, we examined the associations between perceived stress and prefrailty (adjusted OR=1.140; 95% CI, 1.084-1.199) and frailty (adjusted OR=1.409; 95% CI, 1.308-1.518). After adjusting for all variables, including loneliness, depression, and satisfaction, perceived stress was significantly associated with frailty (adjusted OR=1.172; 95% CI, 1.071-1.283), however, insufficient statistical evidence was observed for pre-frailty (adjusted OR=1.022; 95% CI, 0.961-1.086).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Higher levels of perceived stress were associated with frailty in older adults. Stress management efforts may help improve frailty in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":44729,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research","volume":" ","pages":"310-314"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10772339/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4235/agmr.23.0132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Individuals with frailty are susceptible to adverse events. Although a psychological correlation with frailty has been observed, few studies have investigated the link between stress and frailty. This study examined the association between perceived stress and frailty in older adults.

Methods: This cross-sectional observational study included participants recruited between September 2021 and January 2022. The Korean version of the Perceived Stress Scale-10 was used to measure stress levels, while the frailty status was assessed using the Korean Frailty Index. Loneliness, depression, and satisfaction were measured using the UCLA Loneliness Scale, Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale, and Satisfaction with Life Scale, respectively. We used multinomial logistic regression to compare the variables between frail and robust participants.

Results: Among 862 study participants (mean age, 73.62 years; 65.5% women), the mean PSS-10 score was 15.26, 10.8% were frail, 22.4% were pre-frail, and 66.8% were robust. Perceived stress was significantly associated with pre-frailty (crude odds ratio [OR]=1.147; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.093-1.204) and frailty (crude OR=1.417; 95% CI, 1.322-1.520). After adjusting for sociodemographic factors, we examined the associations between perceived stress and prefrailty (adjusted OR=1.140; 95% CI, 1.084-1.199) and frailty (adjusted OR=1.409; 95% CI, 1.308-1.518). After adjusting for all variables, including loneliness, depression, and satisfaction, perceived stress was significantly associated with frailty (adjusted OR=1.172; 95% CI, 1.071-1.283), however, insufficient statistical evidence was observed for pre-frailty (adjusted OR=1.022; 95% CI, 0.961-1.086).

Conclusion: Higher levels of perceived stress were associated with frailty in older adults. Stress management efforts may help improve frailty in this population.

老年人感知到的压力与虚弱。
背景:体弱者容易发生不良事件。虽然人们已经观察到心理与虚弱之间的相关性,但很少有研究调查压力与虚弱之间的联系。本研究探讨了老年人感知到的压力与虚弱之间的关系:这项横断面观察性研究纳入了 2021 年 9 月至 2022 年 1 月间招募的参与者。研究使用韩国版感知压力量表-10来测量压力水平,同时使用韩国虚弱指数来评估虚弱状况。孤独感、抑郁和满意度分别采用加州大学洛杉矶分校孤独感量表、流行病学研究中心抑郁量表和生活满意度量表进行测量。我们使用多项式逻辑回归对体弱者和健壮者的变量进行了比较:在 862 名研究参与者(平均年龄 73.62 岁;65.5% 为女性)中,PSS-10 平均得分为 15.26 分,10.8% 为体弱者,22.4% 为体弱前期,66.8% 为体健者。感知压力与前期虚弱(粗略赔率 [OR]=1.147; 95% 置信区间 [CI],1.093-1.204)和虚弱(粗略赔率=1.417; 95% 置信区间,1.322-1.520)明显相关。在对社会人口学因素进行调整后,我们研究了感知压力与虚弱前期(调整后 OR=1.140;95% CI,1.084-1.199)和虚弱(调整后 OR=1.409;95% CI,1.308-1.518)之间的关系。在对所有变量(包括孤独感、抑郁和满意度)进行调整后,感知到的压力与虚弱有显著相关性(调整后 OR=1.172;95% CI,1.071-1.283),但在虚弱前(调整后 OR=1.022;95% CI,0.961-1.086)观察到的统计证据不足:结论:老年人感知到的压力水平越高,其体弱程度越高。结论:老年人感知到的压力水平越高,其体弱程度越高,压力管理措施可能有助于改善这一人群的体弱状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research
Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
35
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信