Optimizing antibiotic use in culture-negative healthcare-associated infection with a 'stop' policy: a descriptive analytical study.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Sajina Sathyan, Femitha Pournami, Ajai Kumar Prithvi, Anand Nandakumar, Jyothi Prabhakar, Naveen Jain
{"title":"Optimizing antibiotic use in culture-negative healthcare-associated infection with a 'stop' policy: a descriptive analytical study.","authors":"Sajina Sathyan,&nbsp;Femitha Pournami,&nbsp;Ajai Kumar Prithvi,&nbsp;Anand Nandakumar,&nbsp;Jyothi Prabhakar,&nbsp;Naveen Jain","doi":"10.1093/tropej/fmac101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Many sick neonates receive antibiotics for the clinical diagnosis of probable/possible sepsis. Reports suggest rampant antibiotic use in culture-negative sepsis. We introduced an antibiotic stop policy (ASP), by defining 'completed course duration of antibiotics' in the setting of culture-negative suspected healthcare-associated infection (HAI). Antibiotic overuse days (AOD) before antibiotic stop policy (BASP) and after antibiotic stop policy (AASP) were compared.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This descriptive analytical study was conducted to measure the change in AOD after implementing ASP in culture-negative HAI. We also sought to evaluate situations in which antibiotic overuse is likely (lower gestation, ventilation, central lines) and safety of the ASP, measured as not having to restart antibiotics in the week following completed course.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 126 neonates were initiated on a new antibiotic (started or changed) for suspected HAI. Of these, 43 were excluded. Patient days of 5175 and 5208 were analyzed in BASP and AASP, respectively. Implementation of an ASP reduced AOD (from 14.49 to 3.26 AOD per 1000 patient days; p value <0.01). Safety was ensured; the number of babies who had to be restarted on antibiotics within 1 week of stopping therapy was similar in both groups. All-cause mortality and relevant morbidities were comparable between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A significant decrease in AOD after the introduction of an ASP was noted, in neonates with culture-negative suspected HAI. This difference was noted even in the most vulnerable extreme preterm babies and those requiring ventilation and central lines.</p>","PeriodicalId":17521,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Tropical Pediatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Tropical Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tropej/fmac101","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Many sick neonates receive antibiotics for the clinical diagnosis of probable/possible sepsis. Reports suggest rampant antibiotic use in culture-negative sepsis. We introduced an antibiotic stop policy (ASP), by defining 'completed course duration of antibiotics' in the setting of culture-negative suspected healthcare-associated infection (HAI). Antibiotic overuse days (AOD) before antibiotic stop policy (BASP) and after antibiotic stop policy (AASP) were compared.

Methods: This descriptive analytical study was conducted to measure the change in AOD after implementing ASP in culture-negative HAI. We also sought to evaluate situations in which antibiotic overuse is likely (lower gestation, ventilation, central lines) and safety of the ASP, measured as not having to restart antibiotics in the week following completed course.

Results: A total of 126 neonates were initiated on a new antibiotic (started or changed) for suspected HAI. Of these, 43 were excluded. Patient days of 5175 and 5208 were analyzed in BASP and AASP, respectively. Implementation of an ASP reduced AOD (from 14.49 to 3.26 AOD per 1000 patient days; p value <0.01). Safety was ensured; the number of babies who had to be restarted on antibiotics within 1 week of stopping therapy was similar in both groups. All-cause mortality and relevant morbidities were comparable between groups.

Conclusions: A significant decrease in AOD after the introduction of an ASP was noted, in neonates with culture-negative suspected HAI. This difference was noted even in the most vulnerable extreme preterm babies and those requiring ventilation and central lines.

以“停止”政策优化培养阴性卫生保健相关感染的抗生素使用:一项描述性分析研究
背景和目的:许多患病的新生儿接受抗生素的临床诊断可能/可能败血症。报告显示,培养阴性脓毒症中抗生素的使用猖獗。我们引入了抗生素停用政策(ASP),在培养阴性的疑似卫生保健相关感染(HAI)的情况下定义“抗生素疗程完成时间”。比较停药前(BASP)和停药后(AASP)的抗生素过量使用天数(AOD)。方法:采用描述性分析方法,测定培养阴性HAI患者实施ASP后AOD的变化。我们还试图评估抗生素可能过度使用的情况(低妊娠期、通气、中心静脉插管)和ASP的安全性,以在完成疗程后一周内不必重新使用抗生素来衡量。结果:126例新生儿因疑似HAI开始使用新抗生素(开始或更换)。其中43人被排除在外。5175例和5208例患者分别用BASP和AASP分析患者天数。ASP的实施降低了每日平均寿命(从14.49降至3.26);结论:在疑似HAI培养阴性的新生儿中,引入ASP后AOD显著降低。这种差异甚至在最脆弱的极端早产儿和那些需要通气和中心静脉插管的婴儿中也被注意到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Tropical Pediatrics
Journal of Tropical Pediatrics 医学-热带医学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Tropical Pediatrics provides a link between theory and practice in the field. Papers report key results of clinical and community research, and considerations of programme development. More general descriptive pieces are included when they have application to work preceeding elsewhere. The journal also presents review articles, book reviews and, occasionally, short monographs and selections of important papers delivered at relevant conferences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信