MET-FISH Evaluation Algorithm: Proposal of a Simplified Method.

Roberta Castiglione, Christina Alidousty, Barbara Holz, Nicolai Duerbaum, Maike Wittersheim, Elke Binot, Sabine Merkelbach-Bruse, Nicolaus Friedrichs, Matthias S Dettmer, Alexander Bosse, Reinhard Buettner, Anne Maria Schultheis
{"title":"<i>MET</i>-FISH Evaluation Algorithm: Proposal of a Simplified Method.","authors":"Roberta Castiglione,&nbsp;Christina Alidousty,&nbsp;Barbara Holz,&nbsp;Nicolai Duerbaum,&nbsp;Maike Wittersheim,&nbsp;Elke Binot,&nbsp;Sabine Merkelbach-Bruse,&nbsp;Nicolaus Friedrichs,&nbsp;Matthias S Dettmer,&nbsp;Alexander Bosse,&nbsp;Reinhard Buettner,&nbsp;Anne Maria Schultheis","doi":"10.26502/jcsct.5079180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>MET amplifications (METamp) occur in 5% of NSCLC and represent in most case mechanisms of resistance to ALK and/or EGFR-targeted therapies. METamp detection can be performed using different techniques, although Fluorescence In-Situ Hybridization (FISH) remains the gold-standard, especially in the context of subclonality. To date current evaluation algorithms of MET amplifications are time consuming. Aim of the study was to identify a faster, equally reliable diagnostic algorithm for the detection of METamp, which is currently classified in negativity and low/intermediate/high-level amplification. N=497 NSCLC cases with available MET-FISH data had been selected. The results based on the first evaluated 20 cells had been re-calculated and compared with the definitive results based on 60 cells. For n=464 (93.4%) identical results had been obtained when counting 20 cells instead of 60 cells. Thirty-three cases (5.6%) showed a discrepancy, leading to an incorrect upgrade to a higher diagnostic category (n=25) and to an incorrect downgrade (n=8). We propose a simplified, yet equally reliable MET FISH-algorithm: after accurate screening of the whole tumor slide, twenty tumor cells have to be evaluated and results calculated: If the result is negative, or if all criteria of high-level METamp are fulfilled, the case can be signed out as such. All other cases should be considered as equivocal and additional 40 cells have to be counted. Given that, reliable results can be obtained by counting 20 cells only and an \"equivocal\" category for cases that need further investigation have been clearly defined.</p>","PeriodicalId":73634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cancer science and clinical therapeutics","volume":"6 4","pages":"411-427"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9878991/pdf/nihms-1861566.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cancer science and clinical therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26502/jcsct.5079180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

MET amplifications (METamp) occur in 5% of NSCLC and represent in most case mechanisms of resistance to ALK and/or EGFR-targeted therapies. METamp detection can be performed using different techniques, although Fluorescence In-Situ Hybridization (FISH) remains the gold-standard, especially in the context of subclonality. To date current evaluation algorithms of MET amplifications are time consuming. Aim of the study was to identify a faster, equally reliable diagnostic algorithm for the detection of METamp, which is currently classified in negativity and low/intermediate/high-level amplification. N=497 NSCLC cases with available MET-FISH data had been selected. The results based on the first evaluated 20 cells had been re-calculated and compared with the definitive results based on 60 cells. For n=464 (93.4%) identical results had been obtained when counting 20 cells instead of 60 cells. Thirty-three cases (5.6%) showed a discrepancy, leading to an incorrect upgrade to a higher diagnostic category (n=25) and to an incorrect downgrade (n=8). We propose a simplified, yet equally reliable MET FISH-algorithm: after accurate screening of the whole tumor slide, twenty tumor cells have to be evaluated and results calculated: If the result is negative, or if all criteria of high-level METamp are fulfilled, the case can be signed out as such. All other cases should be considered as equivocal and additional 40 cells have to be counted. Given that, reliable results can be obtained by counting 20 cells only and an "equivocal" category for cases that need further investigation have been clearly defined.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

MET-FISH评价算法:一种简化方法的提出
MET扩增(METamp)发生在5%的NSCLC中,在大多数情况下代表了对ALK和/或egfr靶向治疗的耐药机制。METamp检测可以使用不同的技术进行,尽管荧光原位杂交(FISH)仍然是金标准,特别是在亚克隆的背景下。到目前为止,目前的MET扩增评估算法是耗时的。该研究的目的是确定一种更快、同样可靠的诊断算法来检测METamp,目前METamp分为阴性和低/中/高扩增。N=497例具有MET-FISH数据的NSCLC病例被选中。对第一次评估的20个细胞的结果进行了重新计算,并与60个细胞的最终结果进行了比较。对于n=464(93.4%),计数20个细胞而不是60个细胞时获得相同的结果。33例(5.6%)表现出差异,导致错误地升级到更高的诊断类别(n=25)和错误地降级(n=8)。我们提出了一种简化但同样可靠的MET - fish算法:在对整个肿瘤切片进行准确筛选后,需要对20个肿瘤细胞进行评估并计算结果:如果结果为阴性,或者如果符合高水平METamp的所有标准,则可以就此病例进行签出。所有其他情况应被认为是模棱两可的,并且必须计算额外的40个细胞。鉴于此,仅计数20个细胞就可以获得可靠的结果,并且明确定义了需要进一步调查的病例的“模棱两可”类别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信