Intravenous Thrombolytics in the Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke.

IF 0.8 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Kenda Alhadid, Lara Oliveira, Mark R Etherton
{"title":"Intravenous Thrombolytics in the Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke.","authors":"Kenda Alhadid,&nbsp;Lara Oliveira,&nbsp;Mark R Etherton","doi":"10.1007/s11936-022-00973-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To review the current evidence and ongoing clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of tenecteplase (TNK), an alternative tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), in the acute management of arterial ischemic stroke (AIS). To date, alteplase is the only tPA approved by the United States FDA for use in AIS.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>There have been multiple phase two and three trials investigating the safety and efficacy of TNK in AIS. In patients with AIS due to large vessel occlusion, one randomized controlled trial demonstrated superiority of TNK for vessel recanalization rates and long-term functional outcomes when compared to alteplase. A meta-analysis of all phase two and three trials evaluating TNK in AIS concluded that TNK has a comparable safety and efficacy profile to alteplase. The results of these trials prompted new recommendations in the Acute Stroke Guideline published by the AHA suggesting it may be reasonable to use as an alternative to alteplase. Furthermore, recent real-world data has also reported decreased door-to-needle time with TNK utilization.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>In patients with AIS, use of a thrombolytic agent is standard of care and has been shown to reduce neurological disability and improve functional outcome. Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that TNK is non-inferior to alteplase from a clinical outcome and safety standpoint. The existing data evaluating the efficacy of TNK compared to alteplase in acute AIS within 4.5 h from symptom onset showed no significant difference between these two agents with regard to functional outcome at 90 days but improved median time to treatment and large vessel recanalization in TNK-treated patients. The results from ongoing TNK trials in larger patient cohorts and in wake-up stroke populations will be instrumental to the wide-scale utilization of TNK in acute AIS management.</p>","PeriodicalId":35912,"journal":{"name":"Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"15-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9807245/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-022-00973-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose of review: To review the current evidence and ongoing clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of tenecteplase (TNK), an alternative tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), in the acute management of arterial ischemic stroke (AIS). To date, alteplase is the only tPA approved by the United States FDA for use in AIS.

Recent findings: There have been multiple phase two and three trials investigating the safety and efficacy of TNK in AIS. In patients with AIS due to large vessel occlusion, one randomized controlled trial demonstrated superiority of TNK for vessel recanalization rates and long-term functional outcomes when compared to alteplase. A meta-analysis of all phase two and three trials evaluating TNK in AIS concluded that TNK has a comparable safety and efficacy profile to alteplase. The results of these trials prompted new recommendations in the Acute Stroke Guideline published by the AHA suggesting it may be reasonable to use as an alternative to alteplase. Furthermore, recent real-world data has also reported decreased door-to-needle time with TNK utilization.

Summary: In patients with AIS, use of a thrombolytic agent is standard of care and has been shown to reduce neurological disability and improve functional outcome. Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that TNK is non-inferior to alteplase from a clinical outcome and safety standpoint. The existing data evaluating the efficacy of TNK compared to alteplase in acute AIS within 4.5 h from symptom onset showed no significant difference between these two agents with regard to functional outcome at 90 days but improved median time to treatment and large vessel recanalization in TNK-treated patients. The results from ongoing TNK trials in larger patient cohorts and in wake-up stroke populations will be instrumental to the wide-scale utilization of TNK in acute AIS management.

静脉溶栓治疗急性缺血性脑卒中。
综述目的:回顾目前的证据和正在进行的临床试验,评估tenecteplase (TNK),一种替代组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(tPA)在急性动脉缺血性卒中(AIS)治疗中的有效性和安全性。迄今为止,阿替普酶是美国FDA批准用于AIS的唯一tPA。最近的发现:已经有多个二期和三期试验调查了TNK治疗AIS的安全性和有效性。在因大血管闭塞而患有AIS的患者中,一项随机对照试验表明,与阿替普酶相比,TNK在血管再通率和长期功能预后方面具有优势。一项对评估TNK治疗AIS的所有ii期和iii期试验的荟萃分析得出结论,TNK具有与阿替普酶相当的安全性和有效性。这些试验的结果促使美国心脏协会发布的急性卒中指南提出了新的建议,建议将其作为阿替普酶的替代品可能是合理的。此外,最近的实际数据也表明,使用TNK减少了从门到针的时间。摘要:在AIS患者中,使用溶栓药物是标准的治疗方法,已被证明可以减少神经功能障碍并改善功能预后。随机对照试验表明,从临床结果和安全性的角度来看,TNK并不逊于阿替普酶。现有评估秋明与阿替普酶在症状出现后4.5小时内治疗急性AIS的疗效的数据显示,这两种药物在90天的功能结局方面没有显著差异,但秋明治疗患者的中位治疗时间和大血管再通时间有所改善。在更大的患者队列和醒脑人群中进行的TNK试验的结果将有助于TNK在急性AIS管理中的广泛应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine
Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: This journal aims to review the most important, recently published treatment-related advances in cardiovascular medicine. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal intends to elucidate novel approaches to treatment in those affected by the spectrum of cardiovascular-related diseases and conditions.    We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease and stroke, heart failure, pediatric and congenital heart disease, and valvular, myocardial, pericardial, and cardiopulmonary diseases. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. We also provide commentaries from well-known figures in the field, and an international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信