Drawing a line?-Visuo-constructive function as discriminator between healthy individuals, subjective cognitive decline, mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease and predictor of disease progress compared to a multimodal approach.
{"title":"Drawing a line?-Visuo-constructive function as discriminator between healthy individuals, subjective cognitive decline, mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease and predictor of disease progress compared to a multimodal approach.","authors":"Amelie Tokaj, Johann Lehrner","doi":"10.1007/s40211-022-00455-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>One cognitive domain impaired in Alzheimer's disease (AD) is visuo-construction. The Vienna Visuo-constructional Test 3.0 Screening (VVT 3.0 Screening) measures this cognitive domain. This study examines how it works in the differentiation of AD from healthy controls (HC) and the prodromal stages subjective cognitive decline (SCD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and also how it performs in prediction of progress compared to the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Sunderland Clock Drawing Test (CDT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 622 patients (33 HC, 68 SCD, 301 MCI, 220 AD) who completed all three tests were obtained. Furthermore, 117 patients were examined in a follow-up. Data were analyzed in a retrospective analysis comparing the validity of tests in diagnosis and prediction using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves and multinominal logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The VVT 3.0 Screening shows some ability to discriminate between AD and all other participants (sensitivity: 62.1%, specificity: 83.1%), while of the three examined tests none was able to predict membership to all experimental groups or to predict disease-progress adequately. As the VVT 3.0 Screening is short, easy to apply and largely language independent, it can be considered an alternative to the MMSE in certain situations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The VVT 3.0 Screening is useful to discriminate between AD and all other participants and can be an alternative to the MMSE in certain situations.</p>","PeriodicalId":44560,"journal":{"name":"NEUROPSYCHIATRIE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11143003/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEUROPSYCHIATRIE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40211-022-00455-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: One cognitive domain impaired in Alzheimer's disease (AD) is visuo-construction. The Vienna Visuo-constructional Test 3.0 Screening (VVT 3.0 Screening) measures this cognitive domain. This study examines how it works in the differentiation of AD from healthy controls (HC) and the prodromal stages subjective cognitive decline (SCD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and also how it performs in prediction of progress compared to the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Sunderland Clock Drawing Test (CDT).
Methods: Data from 622 patients (33 HC, 68 SCD, 301 MCI, 220 AD) who completed all three tests were obtained. Furthermore, 117 patients were examined in a follow-up. Data were analyzed in a retrospective analysis comparing the validity of tests in diagnosis and prediction using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves and multinominal logistic regression.
Results: The VVT 3.0 Screening shows some ability to discriminate between AD and all other participants (sensitivity: 62.1%, specificity: 83.1%), while of the three examined tests none was able to predict membership to all experimental groups or to predict disease-progress adequately. As the VVT 3.0 Screening is short, easy to apply and largely language independent, it can be considered an alternative to the MMSE in certain situations.
Conclusions: The VVT 3.0 Screening is useful to discriminate between AD and all other participants and can be an alternative to the MMSE in certain situations.
期刊介绍:
Die Zeitschrift ist das offizielle Organ der „Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik (ÖGPP)'', und wissenschaftliches Organ der Österreichischen Alzheimer Gesellschaft, der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie, Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie, der Österreichischen Schizophreniegesellschaft, und der pro mente austria - Österreichischer Dachverband der Vereine und Gesellschaften für psychische und soziale Gesundheit.Sie veröffentlicht Übersichten zu relevanten Themen des Fachs, Originalarbeiten, Kasuistiken sowie Briefe an die Herausgeber. Zudem wird auch Buchbesprechungen sowie Neuigkeiten aus den Bereichen Personalia, Standes- und Berufspolitik sowie Kongressankündigungen Raum gewidmet.Thematisch ist das Fach Psychiatrie und die Methoden der Psychotherapie in allen ihren Facetten vertreten. Die Zeitschrift richtet sich somit an alle Berufsgruppen, die sich mit Ursachen, Erscheinungsformen und Behandlungsmöglichkeiten von psychischen Störungen beschäftigen. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------· The professional and educational journal of the Austrian Society of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics (Österreichische Gesellschaft für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik; ÖGPP) and the Austrian Society of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy (Österreichische Gesellschaft für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie, Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie; ÖGKJP)· Overviews of all relevant topics pertaining to the discipline· Intended for all occupational groups committed to the causes and manifestations of, as well as therapy options for psychic disorders· All manuscripts principally pass through a double-blind peer review process involving at least two independent expertsThe official journal of the Austrian Societies of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics (ÖGPP) and Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy (ÖGKJP)The journal publishes overviews of relevant issues in the field, original work, case reports and letters to the editors. In addition, space is devoted to book reviews, news from the areas of personnel matters and professional policies, and conference announcements.Thematically, the discipline of psychiatry and the methods of psychotherapy are represented in all their facets. The journal is thus aimed at all professional groups committed to the causes and manifestations of, as well as therapy options for psychic disorders