Demonstration of Convolutional Neural Networks to Determine Patch Test Reactivity.

IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Dermatitis Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-12 DOI:10.1089/derm.2023.0148
Adarsh Ravishankar, Nicholas Heller, Paul L Bigliardi
{"title":"Demonstration of Convolutional Neural Networks to Determine Patch Test Reactivity.","authors":"Adarsh Ravishankar, Nicholas Heller, Paul L Bigliardi","doi":"10.1089/derm.2023.0148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i><u></u></i></b> <u><b><i>Background:</i></b></u> Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have the potential to assist allergists and dermatologists in the analysis of patch tests. Such models can help reduce interprovider variability and improve consistency of patch test interpretations. <u><b><i>Objective:</i></b></u> Our aim is to evaluate the performance of a CNN model as a proof of concept in discriminating between patch tests with reactions and patch tests without reactions. <u><b><i>Methods:</i></b></u> We performed a retrospective analysis of patch test images from March 2020 to March 2021. The CNN model was trained as a binary classifier to discriminate between reaction and nonreaction patches. Performance of the model was determined using summary statistics and receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curves. <u><b><i>Results:</i></b></u> In total, 13,622 images from 125 patients were recorded for analysis. The majority of patients in the cohort were female (81.6%) with Fitzpatrick skin types I-II (88.0%). The area under curve was 0.940, indicating a high discriminative performance of the model for this data set. This resulted in a total accuracy of 90.1%, sensitivity of 86.0%, and specificity of 90.2%. <u><b><i>Conclusions:</i></b></u> CNNs have the capacity to determine the presence of delayed-type reactions in patch tests. Future prospective studies are required to assess the generalizability of such models.</p>","PeriodicalId":11047,"journal":{"name":"Dermatitis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatitis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/derm.2023.0148","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have the potential to assist allergists and dermatologists in the analysis of patch tests. Such models can help reduce interprovider variability and improve consistency of patch test interpretations. Objective: Our aim is to evaluate the performance of a CNN model as a proof of concept in discriminating between patch tests with reactions and patch tests without reactions. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patch test images from March 2020 to March 2021. The CNN model was trained as a binary classifier to discriminate between reaction and nonreaction patches. Performance of the model was determined using summary statistics and receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curves. Results: In total, 13,622 images from 125 patients were recorded for analysis. The majority of patients in the cohort were female (81.6%) with Fitzpatrick skin types I-II (88.0%). The area under curve was 0.940, indicating a high discriminative performance of the model for this data set. This resulted in a total accuracy of 90.1%, sensitivity of 86.0%, and specificity of 90.2%. Conclusions: CNNs have the capacity to determine the presence of delayed-type reactions in patch tests. Future prospective studies are required to assess the generalizability of such models.

卷积神经网络用于确定贴片测试反应性的演示。
背景:卷积神经网络(CNN卷积神经网络(CNN)有可能帮助过敏学家和皮肤科医生分析斑贴试验。此类模型有助于减少医生之间的差异,提高斑贴试验解释的一致性。目的:我们的目的是评估 CNN 模型在区分有反应的斑贴试验和无反应的斑贴试验方面的性能,作为概念验证。方法: 我们对有反应的斑贴试验和无反应的斑贴试验进行了回顾性分析:我们对 2020 年 3 月至 2021 年 3 月期间的斑贴试验图像进行了回顾性分析。将 CNN 模型训练为二元分类器,以区分有反应和无反应的斑块。使用汇总统计和接收器运算特性曲线(ROC)确定模型的性能。结果共记录了 125 名患者的 13,622 张图像用于分析。大多数患者为女性(81.6%),菲茨帕特里克皮肤类型为 I-II 型(88.0%)。曲线下面积为 0.940,表明该数据集的模型具有很高的判别性能。因此,总准确率为 90.1%,灵敏度为 86.0%,特异性为 90.2%。结论CNN 有能力确定贴片测试中是否存在延迟型反应。未来需要进行前瞻性研究,以评估此类模型的通用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dermatitis
Dermatitis 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
11.50%
发文量
251
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Dermatitis is owned by the American Contact Dermatitis Society and is the home journal of 4 other organizations, namely Societa Italiana di Dermatologica Allergologica Professionale e Ambientale, Experimental Contact Dermatitis Research Group, International Contact Dermatitis Research Group, and North American Contact Dermatitis Group. Dermatitis focuses on contact, atopic, occupational, and drug dermatitis, and welcomes manuscript submissions in these fields, with emphasis on reviews, studies, reports, and letters. Annual sections include Contact Allergen of the Year and Contact Allergen Alternatives, for which papers are chosen or invited by the respective section editor. Other sections unique to the journal are Pearls & Zebras, Product Allergen Watch, and news, features, or meeting abstracts from participating organizations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信