Bovine hydroxyapatite-based scaffold accelerated the inflammatory phase and bone growth in rats with bone defect.

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 BIOPHYSICS
Maria Apriliani Gani, Aniek Setiya Budiatin, Dewi Wara Shinta, Chrismawan Ardianto, Junaidi Khotib
{"title":"Bovine hydroxyapatite-based scaffold accelerated the inflammatory phase and bone growth in rats with bone defect.","authors":"Maria Apriliani Gani,&nbsp;Aniek Setiya Budiatin,&nbsp;Dewi Wara Shinta,&nbsp;Chrismawan Ardianto,&nbsp;Junaidi Khotib","doi":"10.1177/22808000221149193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hydroxyapatite (HA) is a biomaterial widely used to treat bone defect, such as due to traffic accident. The HA scaffold is obtained from synthetic HA or natural sources, such as bovine hydroxyapatite (BHA). This study aims to compare the characteristics and in vivo performance of BHA-based and HA-based scaffolds. For this purpose, the scaffold was formulated with gelatin (GEL) and characterised by SEM-EDX, FTIR and mini autograph. The defect model was carried out on the femur area of Wistar rats classified into three animal groups: defect, HA-GEL and BHA-GEL. Postoperatively (7, 14 and 28 days), the bone was radiologically evaluated, and stained with haematoxylin-eosin, anti-CD80 and anti-CD163. The BHA-GEL scaffold showed a regular surface and spherical particle shape, whereas the HA-GEL scaffold exhibited irregular surface. The BHA-GEL scaffold had higher pore size and compressive strength and lower calcium-to-phosphorus ratio than the HA-GEL scaffold. In vivo study showed that the expression of CD80 in the three experimental groups was not significantly different. However, the expression of CD163 differed significantly between the groups. The BHA-GEL group showed robust expression of CD163 on day 7, which rapidly decreased over time. It also showed increased osteoclasts, osteoblasts and osteocytes cell count that contributed to the integrity of the defect area. In conclusion, the BHA-based scaffold exhibited the desired physical and chemical characteristics that benefit in vivo performance versus the HA-based scaffold. Thus, the BHA-based scaffold may be used as a bone graft.</p>","PeriodicalId":14985,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Functional Materials","volume":"21 ","pages":"22808000221149193"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Functional Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22808000221149193","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Hydroxyapatite (HA) is a biomaterial widely used to treat bone defect, such as due to traffic accident. The HA scaffold is obtained from synthetic HA or natural sources, such as bovine hydroxyapatite (BHA). This study aims to compare the characteristics and in vivo performance of BHA-based and HA-based scaffolds. For this purpose, the scaffold was formulated with gelatin (GEL) and characterised by SEM-EDX, FTIR and mini autograph. The defect model was carried out on the femur area of Wistar rats classified into three animal groups: defect, HA-GEL and BHA-GEL. Postoperatively (7, 14 and 28 days), the bone was radiologically evaluated, and stained with haematoxylin-eosin, anti-CD80 and anti-CD163. The BHA-GEL scaffold showed a regular surface and spherical particle shape, whereas the HA-GEL scaffold exhibited irregular surface. The BHA-GEL scaffold had higher pore size and compressive strength and lower calcium-to-phosphorus ratio than the HA-GEL scaffold. In vivo study showed that the expression of CD80 in the three experimental groups was not significantly different. However, the expression of CD163 differed significantly between the groups. The BHA-GEL group showed robust expression of CD163 on day 7, which rapidly decreased over time. It also showed increased osteoclasts, osteoblasts and osteocytes cell count that contributed to the integrity of the defect area. In conclusion, the BHA-based scaffold exhibited the desired physical and chemical characteristics that benefit in vivo performance versus the HA-based scaffold. Thus, the BHA-based scaffold may be used as a bone graft.

牛羟基磷灰石支架促进骨缺损大鼠炎症期和骨生长。
羟基磷灰石(Hydroxyapatite, HA)是一种广泛用于治疗交通事故等骨缺损的生物材料。透明质酸支架可从合成透明质酸或天然来源获得,如牛羟基磷灰石(BHA)。本研究旨在比较bha基支架和ha基支架的特点和体内性能。为此,支架用明胶(GEL)配制,并通过SEM-EDX, FTIR和迷你签名进行表征。在Wistar大鼠股骨区域建立缺损模型,分为缺损组、HA-GEL组和BHA-GEL组。术后(7天、14天和28天)对骨进行放射学评估,并用血红素-伊红染色、抗cd80和抗cd163染色。BHA-GEL支架表面呈规则形状,颗粒呈球形,而HA-GEL支架表面呈不规则形状。与HA-GEL支架相比,BHA-GEL支架的孔径和抗压强度更高,钙磷比更低。体内研究表明,CD80在三个实验组中的表达无显著差异。然而,CD163的表达在两组之间存在显著差异。BHA-GEL组在第7天表现出强烈的CD163表达,随着时间的推移迅速下降。它还显示破骨细胞、成骨细胞和骨细胞数量的增加有助于缺损区域的完整性。总之,与ha基支架相比,bha基支架表现出所需的物理和化学特性,有利于体内性能。因此,基于bha的支架可以用作骨移植。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Functional Materials
Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Functional Materials BIOPHYSICS-ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Functional Materials (JABFM) is an open access, peer-reviewed, international journal considering the publication of original contributions, reviews and editorials dealing with clinical and laboratory investigations in the fast growing field of biomaterial sciences and functional materials. The areas covered by the journal will include: • Biomaterials / Materials for biomedical applications • Functional materials • Hybrid and composite materials • Soft materials • Hydrogels • Nanomaterials • Gene delivery • Nonodevices • Metamaterials • Active coatings • Surface functionalization • Tissue engineering • Cell delivery/cell encapsulation systems • 3D printing materials • Material characterization • Biomechanics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信