Prediction of beef tenderness and juiciness using consumer and descriptive sensory attributes

IF 7.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Hillary A. Martinez , Rhonda K. Miller , Chris Kerth , Bridget E. Wasser
{"title":"Prediction of beef tenderness and juiciness using consumer and descriptive sensory attributes","authors":"Hillary A. Martinez ,&nbsp;Rhonda K. Miller ,&nbsp;Chris Kerth ,&nbsp;Bridget E. Wasser","doi":"10.1016/j.meatsci.2023.109292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The impact of different cooking methods, degree of doneness, cuts, and marbling scores on beef juiciness and tenderness have been examined. However, relationships between tenderness and juiciness, the two major components of beef texture, for descriptive and consumer sensory data with Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF) and overall consumer liking have not been elucidated using US consumers recently. The objective was to use two data sets that measured consumer sensory and beef descriptive tenderness and juiciness attributes to understand relationships between consumer and trained descriptive tenderness and juiciness attributes, and Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF) and overall consumer liking. Data were analyzed in two sets, top loin steaks (<em>n</em> = 119) or beef cuts (<em>n</em> = 276) that included top loin steaks, tenderloin steaks, top sirloin steaks, and bottom round roasts. Average WBSF values for top loin steaks and beef cuts were 26.0 and 28.5 N, respectively. Consumer attributes were not strong predictors of WBSF. WBSF was more highly related to descriptive tenderness ratings (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.37 for beef cuts). Overall liking was correlated to consumer attributes, most strongly to flavor liking (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.94 for beef cuts). Descriptive and consumer juiciness ratings did not appreciably improve predictability of regression equations for either WBSF or consumer overall liking. These results indicated that using a WBSF value of 28 N or less for beef cuts would provide assurance for moderately tender beef as defined by descriptive sensory evaluation, and WBSF values between 30 and 32 N were slightly tender (as defined by descriptive sensory evaluation). Beef with WBSF values of 40 or higher were defined as slightly tough or tougher.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":389,"journal":{"name":"Meat Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meat Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0309174023001985","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The impact of different cooking methods, degree of doneness, cuts, and marbling scores on beef juiciness and tenderness have been examined. However, relationships between tenderness and juiciness, the two major components of beef texture, for descriptive and consumer sensory data with Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF) and overall consumer liking have not been elucidated using US consumers recently. The objective was to use two data sets that measured consumer sensory and beef descriptive tenderness and juiciness attributes to understand relationships between consumer and trained descriptive tenderness and juiciness attributes, and Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF) and overall consumer liking. Data were analyzed in two sets, top loin steaks (n = 119) or beef cuts (n = 276) that included top loin steaks, tenderloin steaks, top sirloin steaks, and bottom round roasts. Average WBSF values for top loin steaks and beef cuts were 26.0 and 28.5 N, respectively. Consumer attributes were not strong predictors of WBSF. WBSF was more highly related to descriptive tenderness ratings (R2 = 0.37 for beef cuts). Overall liking was correlated to consumer attributes, most strongly to flavor liking (R2 = 0.94 for beef cuts). Descriptive and consumer juiciness ratings did not appreciably improve predictability of regression equations for either WBSF or consumer overall liking. These results indicated that using a WBSF value of 28 N or less for beef cuts would provide assurance for moderately tender beef as defined by descriptive sensory evaluation, and WBSF values between 30 and 32 N were slightly tender (as defined by descriptive sensory evaluation). Beef with WBSF values of 40 or higher were defined as slightly tough or tougher.

使用消费者和描述性感官属性预测牛肉嫩度和多汁性。
研究了不同烹饪方法、熟度、切块和大理石花纹评分对牛肉多汁性和嫩度的影响。然而,最近还没有使用美国消费者来阐明牛肉质地的两个主要成分嫩度和多汁性之间的关系,这两个成分是Warner Bratzler剪切力(WBSF)的描述性和消费者感官数据以及消费者的总体喜好。目的是使用两个测量消费者感官和牛肉描述性嫩度和多汁性属性的数据集来了解消费者和训练过的描述性嫩度、多汁性属性与Warner Bratzler剪切力(WBSF)和整体消费者喜好之间的关系。数据分为两组进行分析,一组是顶级里脊牛排(n=119),另一组是牛肉切片(n=276),其中包括顶级里脊、里脊、顶级里脊和底部圆形烤肉。顶级里脊牛排和牛肉块的平均WBSF值分别为26.0和28.5 N。消费者属性不是WBSF的有力预测因素。WBSF与描述性嫩度评分的相关性更高(牛肉切块的R2=0.37)。总体喜好与消费者属性相关,最强烈的是与口味喜好相关(牛肉块的R2=0.94)。描述性和消费者兴趣评级并没有显著提高WBSF或消费者总体喜好回归方程的可预测性。这些结果表明,对牛肉切片使用28N或更低的WBSF值将保证描述感官评估所定义的中等嫩牛肉,并且30至32N之间的WBSF值略嫩(描述感官评估定义)。WBSF值为40或更高的牛肉被定义为略硬或更硬。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Meat Science
Meat Science 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
9.90%
发文量
282
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: The aim of Meat Science is to serve as a suitable platform for the dissemination of interdisciplinary and international knowledge on all factors influencing the properties of meat. While the journal primarily focuses on the flesh of mammals, contributions related to poultry will be considered if they enhance the overall understanding of the relationship between muscle nature and meat quality post mortem. Additionally, papers on large birds (e.g., emus, ostriches) as well as wild-captured mammals and crocodiles will be welcomed.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信