Effects of abutment screw preload and preload simulation techniques on dental implant lifetime

Megha Satpathy BS , Rose M. Jose MS , Yuanyuan Duan MS, PhD , Jason A. Griggs PhD
{"title":"Effects of abutment screw preload and preload simulation techniques on dental implant lifetime","authors":"Megha Satpathy BS ,&nbsp;Rose M. Jose MS ,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Duan MS, PhD ,&nbsp;Jason A. Griggs PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jfscie.2022.100010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This study aimed to investigate how the predicted implant fatigue lifetime is affected by the loss of connector screw preload and the finite element analysis method used to simulate preload.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A dental implant assembly (DI1, Biomet-3i external hex; Zimmer Biomet) was scanned using microcomputed tomography and measured using Mimics software (Materialise) and an optical microscope. Digital replicas were constructed using SolidWorks software (Dassault Systèmes). The material properties were assigned in Abaqus (Dassault Systèmes). An external load was applied at 30° off-axial loading. Eight levels of connector screw preload (range, 0-32 Ncm) were simulated for DI1. This assembly and an additional model (DI2) having a longer and narrower screw were compared regarding their fatigue limits (using fe-safe software [Dassault Systèmes]) for 2 preloading methods: (1) adding preload torque or (2) adding bolt axial tension.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The maximum von Mises stresses of DI1 (on the connector screw threads) with and without preload were 439.90 MPa and 587.90 MPa. The predicted fatigue limit was the same for preloads from 100% through 80% of the manufacturer’s recommendation and dropped precipitously between 80% and 70% preload. Adding a preload torque on the screw resulted in a more uniform stress distribution on the screw compared with bolt axial tension, especially for DI2, which had a longer and narrower screw than DI1.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A substantial loss of preload can be accommodated without compromising the fatigue resistance of this dental implant. Computer models should be constructed using torque instead of a bolt axial tension.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73530,"journal":{"name":"JADA foundational science","volume":"1 ","pages":"Article 100010"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9873498/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JADA foundational science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772414X22000068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to investigate how the predicted implant fatigue lifetime is affected by the loss of connector screw preload and the finite element analysis method used to simulate preload.

Methods

A dental implant assembly (DI1, Biomet-3i external hex; Zimmer Biomet) was scanned using microcomputed tomography and measured using Mimics software (Materialise) and an optical microscope. Digital replicas were constructed using SolidWorks software (Dassault Systèmes). The material properties were assigned in Abaqus (Dassault Systèmes). An external load was applied at 30° off-axial loading. Eight levels of connector screw preload (range, 0-32 Ncm) were simulated for DI1. This assembly and an additional model (DI2) having a longer and narrower screw were compared regarding their fatigue limits (using fe-safe software [Dassault Systèmes]) for 2 preloading methods: (1) adding preload torque or (2) adding bolt axial tension.

Results

The maximum von Mises stresses of DI1 (on the connector screw threads) with and without preload were 439.90 MPa and 587.90 MPa. The predicted fatigue limit was the same for preloads from 100% through 80% of the manufacturer’s recommendation and dropped precipitously between 80% and 70% preload. Adding a preload torque on the screw resulted in a more uniform stress distribution on the screw compared with bolt axial tension, especially for DI2, which had a longer and narrower screw than DI1.

Conclusions

A substantial loss of preload can be accommodated without compromising the fatigue resistance of this dental implant. Computer models should be constructed using torque instead of a bolt axial tension.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基牙螺钉预压及预压模拟技术对种植体寿命的影响
本研究旨在探讨预紧螺钉预紧力损失对种植体疲劳寿命的影响,并采用有限元方法模拟预紧力。方法口腔种植体组装(DI1, Biomet-3i外六角;使用微型计算机断层扫描Zimmer Biomet),并使用Mimics软件(Materialise)和光学显微镜进行测量。使用SolidWorks软件(Dassault systemmes)构建数字副本。材料属性在Abaqus(达索系统)中分配。在30°离轴加载处施加外部负载。对DI1模拟了8级连接器螺钉预紧力(范围0-32 Ncm)。采用两种预紧方法(1)增加预紧扭矩或(2)增加螺栓轴向拉力,比较了该组件和另一种型号(DI2)的疲劳极限(使用fe-safe软件[Dassault systemmes])。结果在有预紧力和无预紧力的情况下,连接器螺纹上DI1的最大von Mises应力分别为439.90 MPa和587.90 MPa。预载荷的预测疲劳极限是相同的,从制造商推荐的100%到80%,在80%到70%的预载荷之间急剧下降。与螺栓轴向拉力相比,在螺杆上增加预紧力矩可以使螺杆上的应力分布更加均匀,特别是对于螺杆比螺杆长窄的DI2。结论在不影响种植体抗疲劳性能的前提下,可适应预载荷的大量损失。计算机模型应该使用扭矩而不是螺栓轴向拉力来构建。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JADA foundational science
JADA foundational science Dentistry, Oral Surgery and Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信