The role of medical speciality input in the management of older neurosurgical inpatients.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
British Journal of Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-12 DOI:10.1080/02688697.2023.2254831
Bethan Williams, Giles Critchley
{"title":"The role of medical speciality input in the management of older neurosurgical inpatients.","authors":"Bethan Williams, Giles Critchley","doi":"10.1080/02688697.2023.2254831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With an increasing elderly population, the number of neurosurgical patients aged 65 and over is rising. Ageing is closely related to multimorbidity and frailty, which are both recognised risk factors for postoperative complications and mortality. Comanagement by geriatricians and surgeons has been shown to reduce the length of admission and improve postoperative outcomes in orthopaedics, but evidence for this in neurosurgical patients is limited.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate the demographics of the elderly neurosurgical population, and determine if input by medical teams or completion of frailty scores impacts patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective notes review and review of coding and HES data, including length of stay, number of comorbidities, and mortality rate, was collected for geriatric neurosurgery and spinal surgery patients 65 years and older who were discharged following inpatient admission from April 2019 - March 2020. Full medical notes were retrieved for patients with a length of stay exceeding 14 days, with data on frailty scores and involvement of medical teams collected. Statistical tests were applied to evaluate the difference in outcomes between those reviewed and those not reviewed by medical teams.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-one patients had a length of stay over 14 days. 43% of these 81 patients were reviewed by medical teams during their admission. The mean length of stay was significantly shorter in those receiving medical input (22.8 ± 10.6 days vs 32.4 ± 16.0 days, <i>p</i> = 0.003). There was also a significant association between the completion of a frailty score and subsequent input by medical teams.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The reduction in length of stay observed when patients were reviewed by medical teams supports the role of elderly care physician comanagement in the elderly inpatient neurosurgical population.</p>","PeriodicalId":9261,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"333-339"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2023.2254831","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: With an increasing elderly population, the number of neurosurgical patients aged 65 and over is rising. Ageing is closely related to multimorbidity and frailty, which are both recognised risk factors for postoperative complications and mortality. Comanagement by geriatricians and surgeons has been shown to reduce the length of admission and improve postoperative outcomes in orthopaedics, but evidence for this in neurosurgical patients is limited.

Aims: To evaluate the demographics of the elderly neurosurgical population, and determine if input by medical teams or completion of frailty scores impacts patient outcomes.

Methods: A retrospective notes review and review of coding and HES data, including length of stay, number of comorbidities, and mortality rate, was collected for geriatric neurosurgery and spinal surgery patients 65 years and older who were discharged following inpatient admission from April 2019 - March 2020. Full medical notes were retrieved for patients with a length of stay exceeding 14 days, with data on frailty scores and involvement of medical teams collected. Statistical tests were applied to evaluate the difference in outcomes between those reviewed and those not reviewed by medical teams.

Results: Eighty-one patients had a length of stay over 14 days. 43% of these 81 patients were reviewed by medical teams during their admission. The mean length of stay was significantly shorter in those receiving medical input (22.8 ± 10.6 days vs 32.4 ± 16.0 days, p = 0.003). There was also a significant association between the completion of a frailty score and subsequent input by medical teams.

Conclusions: The reduction in length of stay observed when patients were reviewed by medical teams supports the role of elderly care physician comanagement in the elderly inpatient neurosurgical population.

医学专科投入在老年神经外科住院病人管理中的作用。
背景:随着老年人口的增加,65岁及以上的神经外科患者数量不断增加。衰老与多病和虚弱密切相关,两者都是公认的术后并发症和死亡率的危险因素。老年病专家和外科医生的共同管理已被证明可以缩短骨科住院时间并改善术后预后,但在神经外科患者中证明这一点的证据有限。目的:评估老年神经外科人群的人口统计学特征,并确定医疗团队的输入或完成衰弱评分是否会影响患者的预后。方法:收集2019年4月至2020年3月住院后出院的65岁及以上的老年神经外科和脊柱外科患者的回顾性记录、编码和HES数据,包括住院时间、合并症数量和死亡率。对住院时间超过14天的患者检索了完整的医疗记录,并收集了虚弱评分和医疗队参与情况的数据。采用统计检验来评估经医疗小组审查和未经医疗小组审查的结果之间的差异。结果:81例患者住院时间超过14天。这81名患者中有43%在入院期间接受了医疗小组的复查。接受医疗投入组的平均住院时间明显缩短(22.8±10.6天vs 32.4±16.0天,p = 0.003)。完成虚弱评分与随后医疗团队的投入之间也存在显著关联。结论:当医疗小组对患者进行复查时,观察到住院时间的缩短,支持老年护理医师管理在老年神经外科住院患者中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Neurosurgery
British Journal of Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
139
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Neurosurgery is a leading international forum for debate in the field of neurosurgery, publishing original peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality, along with comment and correspondence on all topics of current interest to neurosurgeons worldwide. Coverage includes all aspects of case assessment and surgical practice, as well as wide-ranging research, with an emphasis on clinical rather than experimental material. Special emphasis is placed on postgraduate education with review articles on basic neurosciences and on the theory behind advances in techniques, investigation and clinical management. All papers are submitted to rigorous and independent peer-review, ensuring the journal’s wide citation and its appearance in the major abstracting and indexing services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信