Production and perception of prevelar merger: Two-dimensional comparisons using Pillai scores and confusion matrices

IF 1.9 1区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Valerie Freeman
{"title":"Production and perception of prevelar merger: Two-dimensional comparisons using Pillai scores and confusion matrices","authors":"Valerie Freeman","doi":"10.1016/j.wocn.2023.101213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Vowel merger production is quantified with gradient acoustic measures, while phonemic perception methods are often coarser, complicating comparisons within mergers in progress. This study implements a perception experiment in two-dimensional formant space (F1 × F2), allowing unified plotting, quantification, and statistics with production data. Production and perception are compared within 20 speakers for a two-part prevelar merger in progress in Pacific Northwest English, where mid-front /ɛ, e/ approximate or merge before voiced velar /ɡ/ (<span>leg–vague</span> merger), and low-front prevelar /æɡ/ raises toward them (<span>bag-</span>raising). Distributions are visualized with kernel density plots and overlap quantified with Pillai scores and confusion matrices from linear discriminant analysis models. Results suggest that <span>leg–vague</span> merger is perceived as more complete than it is produced (in both the sample and community), while <span>bag-</span>raising is highly variable in production but rejected in perception. Relationships between production and perception varied by age, with raising and merger progressing across two generations in production but not perception, followed by younger adults perceiving <span>leg–vague</span> merger but not producing it and varying in (minimal) raising perception while varying in <span>bag</span>-raising in production. Thus, prevelar raising/merger may be progressing among some social groups but reversing in others.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Phonetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9879351/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Phonetics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0095447023000025","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Vowel merger production is quantified with gradient acoustic measures, while phonemic perception methods are often coarser, complicating comparisons within mergers in progress. This study implements a perception experiment in two-dimensional formant space (F1 × F2), allowing unified plotting, quantification, and statistics with production data. Production and perception are compared within 20 speakers for a two-part prevelar merger in progress in Pacific Northwest English, where mid-front /ɛ, e/ approximate or merge before voiced velar /ɡ/ (leg–vague merger), and low-front prevelar /æɡ/ raises toward them (bag-raising). Distributions are visualized with kernel density plots and overlap quantified with Pillai scores and confusion matrices from linear discriminant analysis models. Results suggest that leg–vague merger is perceived as more complete than it is produced (in both the sample and community), while bag-raising is highly variable in production but rejected in perception. Relationships between production and perception varied by age, with raising and merger progressing across two generations in production but not perception, followed by younger adults perceiving leg–vague merger but not producing it and varying in (minimal) raising perception while varying in bag-raising in production. Thus, prevelar raising/merger may be progressing among some social groups but reversing in others.

以前合并的产生和感知:使用Pillai分数和混淆矩阵的二维比较
元音合并的产生是用梯度声学测量来量化的,而音位感知方法往往更粗糙,使正在进行的合并中的比较复杂化。本研究在二维共振峰空间(F1×F2)中实现了感知实验,允许使用生产数据进行统一的绘图、量化和统计。在太平洋西北英语中,对20个说话者的产生和感知进行了比较,这是一个由两部分组成的prevelar合并过程,其中中前/Ş,e/approximate或merge先于浊音velar/å/(leg–vague合并),低前prevelar/æ/向他们举起(举起袋子)。分布用核密度图可视化,重叠用Pillai分数和线性判别分析模型的混淆矩阵量化。结果表明,腿部模糊合并被认为比生产更完整(在样本和社区中),而养袋在生产中变化很大,但在感知中被拒绝。生产和感知之间的关系因年龄而异,两代人在生产中进行饲养和合并,但没有感知,其次是年轻人感知腿——模糊的合并但没有产生,(最小)饲养感知不同,而在生产中饲养袋的感知不同。因此,在一些社会群体中,婚前养育/合并可能正在取得进展,但在另一些群体中却在逆转。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
26.30%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: The Journal of Phonetics publishes papers of an experimental or theoretical nature that deal with phonetic aspects of language and linguistic communication processes. Papers dealing with technological and/or pathological topics, or papers of an interdisciplinary nature are also suitable, provided that linguistic-phonetic principles underlie the work reported. Regular articles, review articles, and letters to the editor are published. Themed issues are also published, devoted entirely to a specific subject of interest within the field of phonetics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信