Higher habitual lying time is inversely associated with vagal-related heart rate variability outcomes in younger adults.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-10 DOI:10.1139/apnm-2023-0167
Myles W O'Brien, Beverly D Schwartz, Madeline E Shivgulam, W Seth Daley, Ryan J Frayne, Derek S Kimmerly
{"title":"Higher habitual lying time is inversely associated with vagal-related heart rate variability outcomes in younger adults.","authors":"Myles W O'Brien,&nbsp;Beverly D Schwartz,&nbsp;Madeline E Shivgulam,&nbsp;W Seth Daley,&nbsp;Ryan J Frayne,&nbsp;Derek S Kimmerly","doi":"10.1139/apnm-2023-0167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Heart rate variability (HRV) is a well-established noninvasive marker of autonomic cardiac control. We test whether time spent sitting (negatively) versus lying (positively) influences vagal HRV outcomes. HRV (10 min supine electrocardiogram) and free-living postures (dual-accelerometer configuration, 7 days) were measured in 31 young healthy adults (15♀, age: 23 ± 3 years). Habitual lying (66 ± 61 min/day), but not sitting time (558 ± 109 min/day), total sedentary time (623 ± 132 min/day), nor step counts (10 752 ± 3200 steps/day; all, <i>p ></i> 0.090), was associated with root mean square of successive cardiac interval differences (ρ = -0.409, <i>p =</i> 0.022) and normalized high-frequency HRV (ρ = -0.361, <i>p</i> = 0.046). These findings document a paradoxical negative impact of waking lying time on cardioautonomic function.   <b>Take home message</b> Using a multi-accelerometer configuration, we demonstrated that more habitual waking time lying, but not sitting or total sedentary time, was associated with worse vagally mediated cardiac control.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2023-0167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Heart rate variability (HRV) is a well-established noninvasive marker of autonomic cardiac control. We test whether time spent sitting (negatively) versus lying (positively) influences vagal HRV outcomes. HRV (10 min supine electrocardiogram) and free-living postures (dual-accelerometer configuration, 7 days) were measured in 31 young healthy adults (15♀, age: 23 ± 3 years). Habitual lying (66 ± 61 min/day), but not sitting time (558 ± 109 min/day), total sedentary time (623 ± 132 min/day), nor step counts (10 752 ± 3200 steps/day; all, p > 0.090), was associated with root mean square of successive cardiac interval differences (ρ = -0.409, p = 0.022) and normalized high-frequency HRV (ρ = -0.361, p = 0.046). These findings document a paradoxical negative impact of waking lying time on cardioautonomic function.   Take home message Using a multi-accelerometer configuration, we demonstrated that more habitual waking time lying, but not sitting or total sedentary time, was associated with worse vagally mediated cardiac control.

在年轻人中,较高的习惯性说谎时间与迷走神经相关的心率变异性结果呈负相关。
心率变异性(HRV)是自主心脏控制的一个公认的非侵入性标志物。我们测试了坐着(消极)和躺着(积极)的时间是否会影响迷走神经HRV的结果。测量了31名年轻健康成年人(15名)的HRV(10分钟仰卧心电图)和自由生活姿势(双加速度计配置,7天)♀, 年龄:23±3岁)。习惯性躺着(66±61分钟/天),但没有坐着时间(558±109分钟/天 752±3200步/天;所有,p>0.090)与连续心间期差异的均方根值(ρ=-0.409,p=0.022)和归一化高频HRV(ρ=-0.1361,p<0.046)相关。这些发现证明了清醒卧位时间对心脏自主功能的反常负面影响。  带回家的信息使用多加速度计配置,我们证明,更多的习惯性清醒时间躺着,而不是坐着或总久坐时间,与迷走神经介导的心脏控制较差有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信