Measures of Subjective Memory for People with Epilepsy: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties.

IF 5.4 2区心理学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES

Neuropsychology Review Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-12 DOI:10.1007/s11065-022-09568-x

Kate Thompson, Ada H Y Lo, Hannah L McGlashan, Tamara Ownsworth, Catherine Haslam, Alan Pegna, David C Reutens

{"title":"Measures of Subjective Memory for People with Epilepsy: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties.","authors":"Kate Thompson, Ada H Y Lo, Hannah L McGlashan, Tamara Ownsworth, Catherine Haslam, Alan Pegna, David C Reutens","doi":"10.1007/s11065-022-09568-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>People with epilepsy frequently express concern about the burden of memory problems in their everyday lives. Self-report memory questionnaires may provide valuable insight into individuals' perceptions of their everyday memory performance and changes over time. Yet, despite their potential utility, the measurement properties of self-report memory questionnaires have not been evaluated in epilepsy. This systematic review aimed to provide a critical appraisal of the measurement properties of self-report memory questionnaires for adults with epilepsy. Following protocol registration (PROSPERO CRD42020210967), a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsychInfo from database inception until 27 May 2021 was conducted. Eligible studies were published in English-language peer-reviewed journals, recruited adults with epilepsy, and reported on the development or evaluation of the measurement properties of a self-report memory questionnaire. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology was used to evaluate each study of a measurement property, and results were qualitatively synthesised. In total, 80 articles and one test manual were located containing 153 studies of measurement properties pertinent to 23 self-report memory questionnaires. Overall, no scale could be recommended outright for the evaluation of subjective memory symptoms in adults with epilepsy. This was due to the near absence of dedicated content validation studies relevant to this population and shortcomings in the methodology and scientific reporting of available studies of structural validity. Recommendations to support the advancement and psychometric validation of self-report memory questionnaires for people with epilepsy are provided.</p>","PeriodicalId":49754,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychology Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-022-09568-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

People with epilepsy frequently express concern about the burden of memory problems in their everyday lives. Self-report memory questionnaires may provide valuable insight into individuals' perceptions of their everyday memory performance and changes over time. Yet, despite their potential utility, the measurement properties of self-report memory questionnaires have not been evaluated in epilepsy. This systematic review aimed to provide a critical appraisal of the measurement properties of self-report memory questionnaires for adults with epilepsy. Following protocol registration (PROSPERO CRD42020210967), a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsychInfo from database inception until 27 May 2021 was conducted. Eligible studies were published in English-language peer-reviewed journals, recruited adults with epilepsy, and reported on the development or evaluation of the measurement properties of a self-report memory questionnaire. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology was used to evaluate each study of a measurement property, and results were qualitatively synthesised. In total, 80 articles and one test manual were located containing 153 studies of measurement properties pertinent to 23 self-report memory questionnaires. Overall, no scale could be recommended outright for the evaluation of subjective memory symptoms in adults with epilepsy. This was due to the near absence of dedicated content validation studies relevant to this population and shortcomings in the methodology and scientific reporting of available studies of structural validity. Recommendations to support the advancement and psychometric validation of self-report memory questionnaires for people with epilepsy are provided.

Abstract Image

查看原文本刊更多论文

癫痫患者主观记忆的测量方法：测量特性的系统回顾。

癫痫患者经常对日常生活中记忆问题造成的负担表示担忧。自我报告记忆力问卷可以提供有价值的洞察力，让人们了解个人对其日常记忆力表现的看法以及随着时间的推移而发生的变化。然而，尽管自我报告记忆力问卷具有潜在的实用性，但其测量特性尚未在癫痫中得到评估。本系统性综述旨在对成人癫痫患者自我报告记忆力问卷的测量特性进行批判性评估。在协议注册（PROSPERO CRD42020210967）后，我们对 PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science、CINAHL 和 PsychInfo 进行了系统性检索，检索时间从数据库开始到 2021 年 5 月 27 日。符合条件的研究均发表在英文同行评审期刊上，招募了成年癫痫患者，并报告了自我报告记忆问卷的开发或测量特性评估。采用基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准（COSMIN）方法对每项研究的测量特性进行评估，并对结果进行定性综合。总共找到了 80 篇文章和一本测试手册，其中包含 153 项与 23 份自我报告记忆力问卷相关的测量特性研究。总体而言，没有任何量表可以直接推荐用于评估成人癫痫患者的主观记忆症状。这是因为几乎没有与这一人群相关的专门内容验证研究，而且现有的结构有效性研究在方法和科学报告方面也存在缺陷。本文提出了一些建议，以支持癫痫患者自我报告记忆力问卷的发展和心理测量验证。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Neuropsychology Review 医学-神经科学

CiteScore

11.00

自引率

1.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： Neuropsychology Review is a quarterly, refereed publication devoted to integrative review papers on substantive content areas in neuropsychology, with particular focus on populations with endogenous or acquired conditions affecting brain and function and on translational research providing a mechanistic understanding of clinical problems. Publication of new data is not the purview of the journal. Articles are written by international specialists in the field, discussing such complex issues as distinctive functional features of central nervous system disease and injury; challenges in early diagnosis; the impact of genes and environment on function; risk factors for functional impairment; treatment efficacy of neuropsychological rehabilitation; the role of neuroimaging, neuroelectrophysiology, and other neurometric modalities in explicating function; clinical trial design; neuropsychological function and its substrates characteristic of normal development and aging; and neuropsychological dysfunction and its substrates in neurological, psychiatric, and medical conditions. The journal''s broad perspective is supported by an outstanding, multidisciplinary editorial review board guided by the aim to provide students and professionals, clinicians and researchers with scholarly articles that critically and objectively summarize and synthesize the strengths and weaknesses in the literature and propose novel hypotheses, methods of analysis, and links to other fields.