Gender Differences in Social Support and Posttraumatic Growth for Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence.

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Psychological Reports Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-22 DOI:10.1177/00332941231153319
Justice M Cundiff, Mary Ellen Fromuth, Dana K Fuller
{"title":"Gender Differences in Social Support and Posttraumatic Growth for Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence.","authors":"Justice M Cundiff, Mary Ellen Fromuth, Dana K Fuller","doi":"10.1177/00332941231153319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current study investigated gender differences in perceived social support and posttraumatic growth for survivors of intimate partner violence. Participants for this study included 86 undergraduate students who indicated at least one instance of partner abuse (consisting of physical abuse, sexual abuse, emotional abuse, and harassment). Participants were predominantly female (68%), White/Caucasian (62%), and between 18 and 21 years of age (84%). Participants responded to the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, the Composite Abuse Scale, and the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory. Mean differences and correlational analyses were utilized to investigate potential gender differences in the study variables as well as the relationships among them. The prevalence of intimate partner violence was comparable to those found in other studies, with 59% of men and 57% of women indicating experiencing abuse from a partner. Although the prevalence rates were similar, women indicated higher overall partner abuse victimization than did men. Moreover, women indicated statistically significantly higher scores than men in three of the four Composite Abuse Scale subscales, reflecting higher levels of victimization for all forms of abuse except for partner harassment. Further, perceived social support scores were similar for men and women, with the only significant gender difference to emerge being that men indicated higher levels of familial support than did women. No statistically significant gender differences emerged for overall posttraumatic growth or for any of its domains. Finally, social support was correlated with posttraumatic growth for women but not for men. The current study, therefore, suggests that men and women may experience similar levels of personal growth in the aftermath of partner abuse. Moreover, these results imply that the relationship between social support and posttraumatic growth may vary according to the gender of the survivor.</p>","PeriodicalId":21149,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Reports","volume":" ","pages":"2965-2979"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941231153319","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current study investigated gender differences in perceived social support and posttraumatic growth for survivors of intimate partner violence. Participants for this study included 86 undergraduate students who indicated at least one instance of partner abuse (consisting of physical abuse, sexual abuse, emotional abuse, and harassment). Participants were predominantly female (68%), White/Caucasian (62%), and between 18 and 21 years of age (84%). Participants responded to the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, the Composite Abuse Scale, and the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory. Mean differences and correlational analyses were utilized to investigate potential gender differences in the study variables as well as the relationships among them. The prevalence of intimate partner violence was comparable to those found in other studies, with 59% of men and 57% of women indicating experiencing abuse from a partner. Although the prevalence rates were similar, women indicated higher overall partner abuse victimization than did men. Moreover, women indicated statistically significantly higher scores than men in three of the four Composite Abuse Scale subscales, reflecting higher levels of victimization for all forms of abuse except for partner harassment. Further, perceived social support scores were similar for men and women, with the only significant gender difference to emerge being that men indicated higher levels of familial support than did women. No statistically significant gender differences emerged for overall posttraumatic growth or for any of its domains. Finally, social support was correlated with posttraumatic growth for women but not for men. The current study, therefore, suggests that men and women may experience similar levels of personal growth in the aftermath of partner abuse. Moreover, these results imply that the relationship between social support and posttraumatic growth may vary according to the gender of the survivor.

亲密伴侣暴力幸存者在社会支持和创伤后成长方面的性别差异。
本研究调查了亲密伴侣暴力幸存者在感知社会支持和创伤后成长方面的性别差异。本研究的参与者包括 86 名本科生,他们表示至少遭受过一次伴侣虐待(包括身体虐待、性虐待、情感虐待和骚扰)。参与者主要为女性(68%)、白人/高加索人(62%),年龄在 18 至 21 岁之间(84%)。参与者回答了感知社会支持多维量表、综合虐待量表和创伤后成长量表。研究人员利用均值差异和相关分析来调查研究变量中潜在的性别差异以及变量之间的关系。亲密伴侣暴力的发生率与其他研究发现的情况相当,59% 的男性和 57% 的女性表示遭受过伴侣的虐待。虽然发生率相似,但女性表示遭受伴侣虐待的总体比例高于男性。此外,在四个综合虐待量表分量表中,女性在三个分量表中的得分在统计上明显高于男性,这反映出除伴侣骚扰外,女性在所有虐待形式中的受害程度都高于男性。此外,男性和女性对社会支持的感知得分相似,唯一显著的性别差异是男性对家庭支持的感知高于女性。在整体创伤后成长或其任何一个领域中,都没有出现具有统计学意义的性别差异。最后,女性的社会支持与创伤后成长相关,而男性则不相关。因此,目前的研究表明,男性和女性在遭受伴侣虐待后可能会经历类似程度的个人成长。此外,这些结果表明,社会支持与创伤后成长之间的关系可能因幸存者的性别而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychological Reports
Psychological Reports PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
171
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信