A systematic review of the efficacy of ketamine for craniofacial pain.

IF 2 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Yasmine Hoydonckx, Tyler McKechnie, Miki Peer, Marina Englesakis, Pranab Kumar
{"title":"A systematic review of the efficacy of ketamine for craniofacial pain.","authors":"Yasmine Hoydonckx,&nbsp;Tyler McKechnie,&nbsp;Miki Peer,&nbsp;Marina Englesakis,&nbsp;Pranab Kumar","doi":"10.1080/24740527.2023.2210167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Craniofacial pain (CFP) poses a burden on patients and health care systems. It is hypothesized that ketamine, an <i>N</i>-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, can reverse central sensitization associated with causation and propagation of CFP. This systematic review aims to assess the role of ketamine for CFP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Databases were searched for studies published up to September 26, 2022, investigating the efficacy of ketamine for adults with CFP. Primary outcome was the change in pain intensity at 60 min postintervention. Two reviewers screened and extracted data. Registration with PROSPERO was performed (CRD42020178649).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty papers (six randomized controlled trials [RCTs], 14 observational studies) including 670 patients were identified. Substantial heterogeneity in terms of study design, population, dose, route of administration, treatment duration, and follow-up was noted. Bolus dose ranged from 0.2-0.3 mg/kg (intravenous) to 0.4 mg/kg (intramuscular) to 0.25-0.75 mg/kg (intranasal). Ketamine infusions (0.1-1 mg/kg/h) were given over various durations. Follow-up was short in RCTs (from 60 min to 72 h) but longer in observational studies (up to 18 months). Ketamine by bolus treatment failed to reduce migraine intensity but had an effect by reducing intensity of aura, cluster headache (CH), and trigeminal neuralgia. Prolonged ketamine infusions showed sustainable reduction of migraine intensity and frequency of CH attacks, but the quality of the evidence is low.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current evidence remains conflicting on the efficacy of ketamine for CFP owing to low quality and heterogeneity across studies. Ketamine infusions are suggested to provide sustained improvement, possibly because of prolonged duration and higher dosage of administration. RCTs should focus on the dose-response relationship of prolonged ketamine infusions on CFP.</p>","PeriodicalId":53214,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur","volume":"7 1","pages":"2210167"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10294769/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24740527.2023.2210167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Craniofacial pain (CFP) poses a burden on patients and health care systems. It is hypothesized that ketamine, an N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, can reverse central sensitization associated with causation and propagation of CFP. This systematic review aims to assess the role of ketamine for CFP.

Methods: Databases were searched for studies published up to September 26, 2022, investigating the efficacy of ketamine for adults with CFP. Primary outcome was the change in pain intensity at 60 min postintervention. Two reviewers screened and extracted data. Registration with PROSPERO was performed (CRD42020178649).

Results: Twenty papers (six randomized controlled trials [RCTs], 14 observational studies) including 670 patients were identified. Substantial heterogeneity in terms of study design, population, dose, route of administration, treatment duration, and follow-up was noted. Bolus dose ranged from 0.2-0.3 mg/kg (intravenous) to 0.4 mg/kg (intramuscular) to 0.25-0.75 mg/kg (intranasal). Ketamine infusions (0.1-1 mg/kg/h) were given over various durations. Follow-up was short in RCTs (from 60 min to 72 h) but longer in observational studies (up to 18 months). Ketamine by bolus treatment failed to reduce migraine intensity but had an effect by reducing intensity of aura, cluster headache (CH), and trigeminal neuralgia. Prolonged ketamine infusions showed sustainable reduction of migraine intensity and frequency of CH attacks, but the quality of the evidence is low.

Conclusion: Current evidence remains conflicting on the efficacy of ketamine for CFP owing to low quality and heterogeneity across studies. Ketamine infusions are suggested to provide sustained improvement, possibly because of prolonged duration and higher dosage of administration. RCTs should focus on the dose-response relationship of prolonged ketamine infusions on CFP.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

氯胺酮治疗颅面疼痛疗效的系统综述。
背景:颅面痛(CFP)给患者和卫生保健系统带来了负担。据推测,氯胺酮是一种n -甲基-d-天冬氨酸(NMDA)受体拮抗剂,可以逆转与CFP的病因和传播相关的中枢致敏。本系统综述旨在评估氯胺酮在CFP中的作用。方法:检索截至2022年9月26日发表的研究资料,调查氯胺酮对成人CFP的疗效。主要结局是干预后60分钟疼痛强度的变化。两名审稿人筛选并提取数据。在PROSPERO进行注册(CRD42020178649)。结果:共纳入20篇论文(6项随机对照试验[rct], 14项观察性研究),670例患者。注意到研究设计、人群、剂量、给药途径、治疗持续时间和随访方面的实质性异质性。注射剂量范围从0.2-0.3 mg/kg(静脉注射)到0.4 mg/kg(肌肉注射)到0.25-0.75 mg/kg(鼻内)。氯胺酮输注(0.1-1 mg/kg/h)不同疗程。随机对照试验的随访时间较短(从60分钟到72小时),但观察性研究的随访时间较长(长达18个月)。氯胺酮大剂量治疗不能减轻偏头痛的强度,但可以减轻先兆、丛集性头痛和三叉神经痛的强度。长期氯胺酮输注显示偏头痛强度和CH发作频率的持续降低,但证据质量较低。结论:目前关于氯胺酮治疗CFP的疗效的证据仍然存在矛盾,因为研究的质量低且异质性大。氯胺酮输注可提供持续的改善,可能是因为持续时间延长和给药剂量增加。随机对照试验应关注氯胺酮长期输注对CFP的量效关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信