Association of Vulnerability Screening on Hospital Admission with Discharge to Rehabilitation-Oriented Care after Acute Hospital Stay.

IF 2.8 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-11 DOI:10.4235/agmr.23.0068
Aafke J de Groot, Elizabeth M Wattel, Romke van Balen, Cees M P M Hertogh, Johannes C van der Wouden
{"title":"Association of Vulnerability Screening on Hospital Admission with Discharge to Rehabilitation-Oriented Care after Acute Hospital Stay.","authors":"Aafke J de Groot, Elizabeth M Wattel, Romke van Balen, Cees M P M Hertogh, Johannes C van der Wouden","doi":"10.4235/agmr.23.0068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We assessed the vulnerability of patients aged ≥70 years during hospital admission based on the Short Dutch Safety Management Screening (DSMS). Screening of four geriatric domains aims to prevent adverse outcomes and may support targeted discharge planning for post-acute care. We explored whether the DSMS criteria for acutely admitted patients were associated with rehabilitation-oriented care needs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included community-dwelling patients aged ≥70 years acutely admitted to a tertiary hospital. We recorded patient demographics, morbidity, functional status, malnutrition, fall risk, and delirium and used descriptive analysis to calculate the risks by comparing the discharge destination groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 491 hospital discharges, 349 patients (71.1%) returned home, 60 (12.2%) were referred for geriatric rehabilitation, and 82 (16.7%) to other inpatient post-acute care. Non-home referrals increased with age from 21% (70-80 years) to 61% (&gt;90 years). A surgical diagnosis (odds ratio [OR]=4.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.03-11.95), functional decline represented by Katz-activities of daily living positive screening (OR=3.79; 95% CI, 1.76-8.14), and positive fall risk (OR=2.87; 95% CI, 1.31-6.30) were associated with non-home discharge. The Charlson Comorbidity Index did not differ significantly between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Admission diagnosis and vulnerability screening outcomes were associated with discharge to rehabilitation-oriented care in patients &gt;70 years of age. The usual care data from DSMS vulnerability screening can raise awareness of discharge complexity and provide opportunities to support timely and personalized transitional care.</p>","PeriodicalId":44729,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research","volume":" ","pages":"301-309"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10772331/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4235/agmr.23.0068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We assessed the vulnerability of patients aged ≥70 years during hospital admission based on the Short Dutch Safety Management Screening (DSMS). Screening of four geriatric domains aims to prevent adverse outcomes and may support targeted discharge planning for post-acute care. We explored whether the DSMS criteria for acutely admitted patients were associated with rehabilitation-oriented care needs.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included community-dwelling patients aged ≥70 years acutely admitted to a tertiary hospital. We recorded patient demographics, morbidity, functional status, malnutrition, fall risk, and delirium and used descriptive analysis to calculate the risks by comparing the discharge destination groups.

Results: Among 491 hospital discharges, 349 patients (71.1%) returned home, 60 (12.2%) were referred for geriatric rehabilitation, and 82 (16.7%) to other inpatient post-acute care. Non-home referrals increased with age from 21% (70-80 years) to 61% (>90 years). A surgical diagnosis (odds ratio [OR]=4.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.03-11.95), functional decline represented by Katz-activities of daily living positive screening (OR=3.79; 95% CI, 1.76-8.14), and positive fall risk (OR=2.87; 95% CI, 1.31-6.30) were associated with non-home discharge. The Charlson Comorbidity Index did not differ significantly between the groups.

Conclusion: Admission diagnosis and vulnerability screening outcomes were associated with discharge to rehabilitation-oriented care in patients >70 years of age. The usual care data from DSMS vulnerability screening can raise awareness of discharge complexity and provide opportunities to support timely and personalized transitional care.

入院时的脆弱性筛查与急性期住院后出院接受康复护理的关系。
背景:我们根据简易荷兰安全管理筛查(DSMS)评估了入院期间年龄≥70 岁患者的脆弱性。对四个老年医学领域进行筛查的目的是预防不良后果的发生,并可支持有针对性的出院后护理计划。我们探讨了急性入院患者的 DSMS 标准是否与以康复为导向的护理需求相关:这项回顾性队列研究纳入了在一家三级医院急诊住院的年龄≥70 岁的社区居民患者。我们记录了患者的人口统计学特征、发病率、功能状态、营养不良、跌倒风险和谵妄,并通过比较出院目的地组别,使用描述性分析来计算风险:在 491 例出院患者中,349 例(71.1%)返回家中,60 例(12.2%)转诊至老年康复中心,82 例(16.7%)转诊至其他住院后护理机构。非居家转诊随年龄增长而增加,从 21%(70-80 岁)增至 61%(90 岁)。手术诊断(几率比 [OR]=4.92; 95% 置信区间 [CI],2.03-11.95)、卡茨日常生活活动筛查阳性(OR=3.79; 95% CI,1.76-8.14)所代表的功能衰退以及跌倒风险阳性(OR=2.87; 95% CI,1.31-6.30)与非居家出院相关。结论:入院诊断和易感性筛查与非居家出院相关:结论:入院诊断和易感性筛查结果与70岁患者出院后接受康复护理有关。来自 DSMS 易感性筛查的常规护理数据可提高对出院复杂性的认识,并为支持及时和个性化的过渡护理提供机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research
Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
35
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信