ASSOCIATION OF ORAL MICROBIOTA AND PERIODONTAL DISEASE WITH LUNG CANCER: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

IF 4.1 4区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Kai Zhang BDS , Cheng He PhD , Yuan Qiu BDS , Xiuyang Li PhD , Jian Hu PhD , Baiping Fu DMD
{"title":"ASSOCIATION OF ORAL MICROBIOTA AND PERIODONTAL DISEASE WITH LUNG CANCER: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS","authors":"Kai Zhang BDS ,&nbsp;Cheng He PhD ,&nbsp;Yuan Qiu BDS ,&nbsp;Xiuyang Li PhD ,&nbsp;Jian Hu PhD ,&nbsp;Baiping Fu DMD","doi":"10.1016/j.jebdp.2023.101897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Evidence of oral microbiota perturbations has been accumulated for lung cancers. This review focused on the oral microbiota alterations in population suffering from lung cancer. In addition, we also discussed conflicting data about the association between oral microbiota dysbiosis and risk of lung cancer.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic search was conducted in Medline, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases. The studies evaluated diversity and abundance of oral microbes in healthy and lung cancer individuals as well as association of periodontal disease and pathogens with lung cancer. Of 3559 studies, 28 included studies were performed in qualitative analysis, and 25 studies were used in meta-analyses for quantitative assessment. Heterogeneity was analyzed by using I² and chi-squared Q test statistics. Statistical analyses were performed by using the RevMan 5.4 software.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Compared with the control, lung cancer patients had lower alpha diversity (Shannon: SMD = -0.54; 95% CI, -0.90 to -0.19; <em>P</em> &lt; .01, I<sup>2</sup> = 71%). In nested case-control studies, individuals with decreased alpha diversity tended to have an increased risk of lung cancer (observed species: HR = 0.90; 95% CI, 0.85-0.96; <em>P</em> &lt; .01, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%; Shannon: HR = 0.89; 95% CI, 0.83-0.95; <em>P</em> &lt; .01, I<sup>2</sup><span> = 0%). Overall, no strong evidence of association of relative abundance with specific oral microbes with lung cancers was found because of inconsistent data. No associations were found between periodontal pathogens and lung cancer risk (red complex: HR = 1.12, 95% CI: 0.42-3.02, </span><em>P</em> = .82, I<sup>2</sup> = 62%; orange complex: HR =1.77, 95% CI: 0.78-3.98, <em>P</em> = .17, I<sup>2</sup><span> = 36%), expect for Fusobacterium nucleatum (HR = 2.27, 95% CI: 1.13-4.58, </span><em>P</em> = .02, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). The positive association of periodontal disease with lung cancer risk was found (HR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.25-2.00, <em>P</em> &lt; .001, I<sup>2</sup>= 0%) with increase of periodontal diseases severity (HR = 2.39, 95% CI: 1.57-3.66, <em>P</em> &lt; .001, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). However, such association was not found in never-smoker participants (HR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.76-1.31, <em>P</em> = .37, I<sup>2</sup>= 7%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Lower alpha diversity of oral microbiome may be associated with a greater risk of lung cancer and might serve as a predictive signal of lung cancer risk. There was no strong evidence of relative abundance of oral microbial taxa and periodontal pathogens in lung cancer patients. Fusobacterium nucleatum might be a potential microbial candidate of biomarkers in lung cancer. Periodontal disease may be positively associated with lung cancer risk by confounding of smoking, but not an independent risk factor.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48736,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice","volume":"23 3","pages":"Article 101897"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532338223000829","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Evidence of oral microbiota perturbations has been accumulated for lung cancers. This review focused on the oral microbiota alterations in population suffering from lung cancer. In addition, we also discussed conflicting data about the association between oral microbiota dysbiosis and risk of lung cancer.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted in Medline, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases. The studies evaluated diversity and abundance of oral microbes in healthy and lung cancer individuals as well as association of periodontal disease and pathogens with lung cancer. Of 3559 studies, 28 included studies were performed in qualitative analysis, and 25 studies were used in meta-analyses for quantitative assessment. Heterogeneity was analyzed by using I² and chi-squared Q test statistics. Statistical analyses were performed by using the RevMan 5.4 software.

Results

Compared with the control, lung cancer patients had lower alpha diversity (Shannon: SMD = -0.54; 95% CI, -0.90 to -0.19; P < .01, I2 = 71%). In nested case-control studies, individuals with decreased alpha diversity tended to have an increased risk of lung cancer (observed species: HR = 0.90; 95% CI, 0.85-0.96; P < .01, I2 = 0%; Shannon: HR = 0.89; 95% CI, 0.83-0.95; P < .01, I2 = 0%). Overall, no strong evidence of association of relative abundance with specific oral microbes with lung cancers was found because of inconsistent data. No associations were found between periodontal pathogens and lung cancer risk (red complex: HR = 1.12, 95% CI: 0.42-3.02, P = .82, I2 = 62%; orange complex: HR =1.77, 95% CI: 0.78-3.98, P = .17, I2 = 36%), expect for Fusobacterium nucleatum (HR = 2.27, 95% CI: 1.13-4.58, P = .02, I2 = 0%). The positive association of periodontal disease with lung cancer risk was found (HR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.25-2.00, P < .001, I2= 0%) with increase of periodontal diseases severity (HR = 2.39, 95% CI: 1.57-3.66, P < .001, I2 = 0%). However, such association was not found in never-smoker participants (HR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.76-1.31, P = .37, I2= 7%).

Conclusions

Lower alpha diversity of oral microbiome may be associated with a greater risk of lung cancer and might serve as a predictive signal of lung cancer risk. There was no strong evidence of relative abundance of oral microbial taxa and periodontal pathogens in lung cancer patients. Fusobacterium nucleatum might be a potential microbial candidate of biomarkers in lung cancer. Periodontal disease may be positively associated with lung cancer risk by confounding of smoking, but not an independent risk factor.

口腔微生物群和牙周病与肺癌的关系:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
目的:已经积累了肺癌患者口腔微生物群紊乱的证据。本文综述了癌症患者口腔微生物群的变化。此外,我们还讨论了关于口腔微生物群生态失调与癌症风险之间关系的相互矛盾的数据。方法:在Medline、Embase、PubMed和Cochrane Library数据库中进行系统检索。研究评估了健康人和癌症患者口腔微生物的多样性和丰度,以及牙周病和病原体与癌症的关系。在3559项研究中,28项纳入研究进行了定性分析,25项研究用于荟萃分析进行定量评估。利用I²和卡方Q检验统计量分析异质性。使用RevMan 5.4软件进行统计分析。结果:与对照组相比,癌症患者的α多样性较低(Shannon:SMD = -0.54;95%可信区间为-0.90~-0.19;P<0.01,I2 = 71%)。在嵌套病例对照研究中,α多样性降低的个体患癌症的风险往往增加(观察物种:HR = 0.90;95%可信区间0.85-0.96;P<0.01,I2 = 0%;Shannon:人力资源 = 0.89;95%可信区间0.83-0.95;P<0.01,I2 = 0%)。总体而言,由于数据不一致,没有发现与特定口腔微生物的相对丰度与肺癌相关的有力证据。牙周病原体与肺癌癌症风险之间未发现相关性(红色复合体:HR = 1.12,95%置信区间:0.42-3.02,P = .82,I2 = 62%;橙色复合体:HR=1.77,95%可信区间:0.78-3.98,P = .17,I2 = 36%),预计有核梭杆菌(HR = 2.27,95%置信区间:1.13-4.58,P = .02,I2 = 0%)。牙周病与肺癌风险呈正相关(HR = 1.58,95%CI:1.25-2.00,P<.001,I2=0%)随牙周病严重程度的增加(HR = 2.39,95%CI:1.57-3.66,P<.001,I2 = 0%)。然而,在从不吸烟的参与者中没有发现这种关联(HR = 1.00,95%置信区间:0.76-1.31,P = .37,I2=7%)。结论:口腔微生物组α多样性较低可能与癌症风险较高有关,并可能作为癌症风险的预测信号。没有强有力的证据表明癌症患者的口腔微生物分类群和牙周病原体相对丰富。核梭杆菌可能是癌症生物标志物的潜在候选微生物。牙周病可能通过吸烟的混淆与肺癌癌症风险呈正相关,但不是一个独立的风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice
Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
105
审稿时长
28 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice presents timely original articles, as well as reviews of articles on the results and outcomes of clinical procedures and treatment. The Journal advocates the use or rejection of a procedure based on solid, clinical evidence found in literature. The Journal''s dynamic operating principles are explicitness in process and objectives, publication of the highest-quality reviews and original articles, and an emphasis on objectivity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信