International regulatory uses of acute systemic toxicity data and integration of new approach methodologies.

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 TOXICOLOGY
Critical Reviews in Toxicology Pub Date : 2023-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-30 DOI:10.1080/10408444.2023.2240852
Judy Strickland, Esther Haugabrooks, David G Allen, Luciene B Balottin, Yoko Hirabayashi, Nicole C Kleinstreuer, Hajime Kojima, Claudio Nishizawa, Pilar Prieto, Deborah E Ratzlaff, Jayoung Jeong, JinHee Lee, Ying Yang, Pinpin Lin, Kristie Sullivan, Warren Casey
{"title":"International regulatory uses of acute systemic toxicity data and integration of new approach methodologies.","authors":"Judy Strickland, Esther Haugabrooks, David G Allen, Luciene B Balottin, Yoko Hirabayashi, Nicole C Kleinstreuer, Hajime Kojima, Claudio Nishizawa, Pilar Prieto, Deborah E Ratzlaff, Jayoung Jeong, JinHee Lee, Ying Yang, Pinpin Lin, Kristie Sullivan, Warren Casey","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2023.2240852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chemical regulatory authorities around the world require systemic toxicity data from acute exposures via the oral, dermal, and inhalation routes for human health risk assessment. To identify opportunities for regulatory uses of non-animal replacements for these tests, we reviewed acute systemic toxicity testing requirements for jurisdictions that participate in the International Cooperation on Alternative Test Methods (ICATM): Brazil, Canada, China, the European Union, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, and the USA. The chemical sectors included in our review of each jurisdiction were cosmetics, consumer products, industrial chemicals, pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and pesticides. We found acute systemic toxicity data were most often required for hazard assessment, classification, and labeling, and to a lesser extent quantitative risk assessment. Where animal methods were required, animal reduction methods were typically recommended. For many jurisdictions and chemical sectors, non-animal alternatives are not accepted, but several jurisdictions provide guidance to support the use of test waivers to reduce animal use for specific applications. An understanding of international regulatory requirements for acute systemic toxicity testing will inform ICATM's strategy for the development, acceptance, and implementation of non-animal alternatives to assess the health hazards and risks associated with acute toxicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"385-411"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10592330/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408444.2023.2240852","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chemical regulatory authorities around the world require systemic toxicity data from acute exposures via the oral, dermal, and inhalation routes for human health risk assessment. To identify opportunities for regulatory uses of non-animal replacements for these tests, we reviewed acute systemic toxicity testing requirements for jurisdictions that participate in the International Cooperation on Alternative Test Methods (ICATM): Brazil, Canada, China, the European Union, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, and the USA. The chemical sectors included in our review of each jurisdiction were cosmetics, consumer products, industrial chemicals, pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and pesticides. We found acute systemic toxicity data were most often required for hazard assessment, classification, and labeling, and to a lesser extent quantitative risk assessment. Where animal methods were required, animal reduction methods were typically recommended. For many jurisdictions and chemical sectors, non-animal alternatives are not accepted, but several jurisdictions provide guidance to support the use of test waivers to reduce animal use for specific applications. An understanding of international regulatory requirements for acute systemic toxicity testing will inform ICATM's strategy for the development, acceptance, and implementation of non-animal alternatives to assess the health hazards and risks associated with acute toxicity.

急性系统毒性数据的国际监管使用和新方法的整合。
世界各地的化学监管机构需要通过口服、皮肤和吸入途径急性暴露的系统毒性数据,以进行人类健康风险评估。为了确定非动物替代品用于这些试验的监管使用机会,我们审查了参与替代试验方法国际合作(ICATM)的司法管辖区的急性全身毒性试验要求:巴西、加拿大、中国、欧盟、日本、韩国、台湾和美国。我们对每个管辖区的审查中包括的化学行业包括化妆品、消费品、工业化学品、制药、医疗器械和农药。我们发现,急性全身毒性数据通常是危险评估、分类和标记所需的,在较小程度上是定量风险评估所需的。在需要动物方法的情况下,通常建议使用动物减少方法。对于许多司法管辖区和化学行业,不接受非动物替代品,但一些司法管辖区提供了指导,支持使用测试豁免来减少特定应用中的动物使用。了解急性全身毒性测试的国际监管要求将为ICATM开发、接受和实施非动物替代品的战略提供信息,以评估与急性毒性相关的健康危害和风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
1.70%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Critical Reviews in Toxicology provides up-to-date, objective analyses of topics related to the mechanisms of action, responses, and assessment of health risks due to toxicant exposure. The journal publishes critical, comprehensive reviews of research findings in toxicology and the application of toxicological information in assessing human health hazards and risks. Toxicants of concern include commodity and specialty chemicals such as formaldehyde, acrylonitrile, and pesticides; pharmaceutical agents of all types; consumer products such as macronutrients and food additives; environmental agents such as ambient ozone; and occupational exposures such as asbestos and benzene.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信