Chapitre 6. Le déploiement de la médecine génomique : la place de l’autonomie du patient dans la réutilisation des données génétiques au profit de la recherche.

Lisa Feriol, Emmanuelle Rial-Sebbag
{"title":"Chapitre 6. Le déploiement de la médecine génomique : la place de l’autonomie du patient dans la réutilisation des données génétiques au profit de la recherche.","authors":"Lisa Feriol,&nbsp;Emmanuelle Rial-Sebbag","doi":"10.3917/jibes.342.0089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Genetic research today is largely based on the reuse of data from care for the benefit of research. This evolution of practices, which involves an increasingly marked communication between care and research, questions the place given to the patient seen as a potential participant in research. In order to promote the circulation of genetic data generated and to allow their reuse for the benefit of different research, the French legislator reaffirmed the use of the opt-out mechanism (&#8220;non-opposition&#8221;) in the last bioethics law of the 2 August 2021. If the reasons that led the legislator to make this shift from the concept of consent to the opt-out mechanism are legitimate, the conditions of implementation of this mechanism seem to need to be questioned in order to ensure the effectivity of the balance sought by the legislator between preserving the autonomy of the individual with regard to the sharing of his/her genetic data and encouraging the development of medical knowledge; one should not be to the detriment of the other.</p>","PeriodicalId":73577,"journal":{"name":"Journal international de bioethique et d'ethique des sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal international de bioethique et d'ethique des sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/jibes.342.0089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Genetic research today is largely based on the reuse of data from care for the benefit of research. This evolution of practices, which involves an increasingly marked communication between care and research, questions the place given to the patient seen as a potential participant in research. In order to promote the circulation of genetic data generated and to allow their reuse for the benefit of different research, the French legislator reaffirmed the use of the opt-out mechanism (“non-opposition”) in the last bioethics law of the 2 August 2021. If the reasons that led the legislator to make this shift from the concept of consent to the opt-out mechanism are legitimate, the conditions of implementation of this mechanism seem to need to be questioned in order to ensure the effectivity of the balance sought by the legislator between preserving the autonomy of the individual with regard to the sharing of his/her genetic data and encouraging the development of medical knowledge; one should not be to the detriment of the other.

第6章)。基因组医学的部署:患者自主在遗传数据再利用中的地位,以促进研究。
今天的基因研究很大程度上是基于对医疗数据的再利用,以造福于研究。这种实践的演变,涉及到护理和研究之间日益显著的交流,对患者作为研究潜在参与者的地位提出了质疑。为了促进所产生的基因数据的流通,并允许将其重新用于不同的研究,法国立法者在2021年8月2日的最后一部生物伦理学法中重申使用选择退出机制(“非反对”)。如果导致立法者从同意的概念转向选择退出机制的原因是合理的,则似乎需要质疑实施这一机制的条件,以确保立法者在保留个人在分享其遗传数据方面的自主权和鼓励医学知识的发展之间寻求平衡的有效性;一方不应损害另一方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信