Cluster-randomized controlled trial of intermittent preventive treatment in infancy using sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP-IPTi): a pilot study in Nigeria.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Olumide Thomas Adeleke, Abayomi Oyenuga, Tina M Slusher, Daniel A Gbadero
{"title":"Cluster-randomized controlled trial of intermittent preventive treatment in infancy using sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP-IPTi): a pilot study in Nigeria.","authors":"Olumide Thomas Adeleke,&nbsp;Abayomi Oyenuga,&nbsp;Tina M Slusher,&nbsp;Daniel A Gbadero","doi":"10.1093/tropej/fmad001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Malaria kills a child in sub-Saharan Africa every 2 min despite widely available interventions including intermittent preventive treatment in infants (IPTi). Since 2010, when World Health Organization (WHO) recommended IPTi, no country has implemented it. To our knowledge, no IPTi study has been conducted in Nigeria. Considering severity of malaria in infancy and urgency to improve malaria prevention, we proposed a study to investigate the efficacy of this intervention in reducing malarial morbidity and mortality.</p><p><strong>Objective(s): </strong>The aim of this was to determine the safety and efficacy of SP-IPTi in reducing the prevalence of asymptomatic malaria parasitemia and malarial-associated hospital admissions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a cluster-randomized controlled trial in 1379 infants. SP was administered alongside routine vaccinations in immunization centers randomized to intervention groups. Infants in control groups received only routine vaccines. Malarial 'morbidity and adverse events were monitored through passive case-detection and cross-sectional surveys'.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SP-IPTi was safe. There was no statistically significant difference in terms of risks of asymptomatic parasitemia at 9 months, fever or hospitalization between our control and intervention groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrated that SP-IPTi had no benefit but was well tolerated. WHO and some researchers have also reported declining efficacy of SP, due to increasing drug resistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":17521,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Tropical Pediatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Tropical Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tropej/fmad001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Malaria kills a child in sub-Saharan Africa every 2 min despite widely available interventions including intermittent preventive treatment in infants (IPTi). Since 2010, when World Health Organization (WHO) recommended IPTi, no country has implemented it. To our knowledge, no IPTi study has been conducted in Nigeria. Considering severity of malaria in infancy and urgency to improve malaria prevention, we proposed a study to investigate the efficacy of this intervention in reducing malarial morbidity and mortality.

Objective(s): The aim of this was to determine the safety and efficacy of SP-IPTi in reducing the prevalence of asymptomatic malaria parasitemia and malarial-associated hospital admissions.

Methods: We performed a cluster-randomized controlled trial in 1379 infants. SP was administered alongside routine vaccinations in immunization centers randomized to intervention groups. Infants in control groups received only routine vaccines. Malarial 'morbidity and adverse events were monitored through passive case-detection and cross-sectional surveys'.

Results: SP-IPTi was safe. There was no statistically significant difference in terms of risks of asymptomatic parasitemia at 9 months, fever or hospitalization between our control and intervention groups.

Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that SP-IPTi had no benefit but was well tolerated. WHO and some researchers have also reported declining efficacy of SP, due to increasing drug resistance.

婴儿使用磺胺多辛-乙胺嘧啶(SP-IPTi)间歇预防性治疗的整群随机对照试验:尼日利亚的一项试点研究。
背景:在撒哈拉以南非洲,尽管可广泛获得干预措施,包括对婴儿进行间歇性预防治疗(IPTi),但每两分钟就有一名儿童死于疟疾。自2010年世界卫生组织(世卫组织)建议实施IPTi以来,没有任何国家实施。据我们所知,尼日利亚没有开展IPTi研究。考虑到婴儿期疟疾的严重程度和提高疟疾预防的紧迫性,我们提出了一项研究,探讨SP-IPTi在降低无症状疟疾寄生虫病患病率和疟疾相关住院率方面的安全性和有效性。方法:我们对1379名婴儿进行了分组随机对照试验。SP与常规疫苗一起在随机分配到干预组的免疫中心接种。对照组的婴儿只接种常规疫苗。通过被动病例检测和横断面调查监测疟疾的发病率和不良事件。结果:SP-IPTi安全。对照组与干预组在9个月无症状寄生虫病、发热或住院风险方面无统计学差异。结论:我们的研究表明SP-IPTi没有益处,但耐受性良好。世卫组织和一些研究人员还报告说,由于耐药性增加,SP的疗效正在下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Tropical Pediatrics
Journal of Tropical Pediatrics 医学-热带医学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Tropical Pediatrics provides a link between theory and practice in the field. Papers report key results of clinical and community research, and considerations of programme development. More general descriptive pieces are included when they have application to work preceeding elsewhere. The journal also presents review articles, book reviews and, occasionally, short monographs and selections of important papers delivered at relevant conferences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信