Clinical outcome and computer tomography based tunnel placement evaluation following arthroscopic anteromedial portal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in non-athletic population.

IF 1.4 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Himanshu Shekhar, Amit Srivastava, Rajesh Kumar Rajnish, Shuchi Bhatt, Anil K Jain, Rehan Ul Haq
{"title":"Clinical outcome and computer tomography based tunnel placement evaluation following arthroscopic anteromedial portal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in non-athletic population.","authors":"Himanshu Shekhar,&nbsp;Amit Srivastava,&nbsp;Rajesh Kumar Rajnish,&nbsp;Shuchi Bhatt,&nbsp;Anil K Jain,&nbsp;Rehan Ul Haq","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The morphology of distal femur and proximal tibia varies between different ethnicities, and it can affect the tunnel dimensions and positions while doing ACL reconstruction which may affect the clinical outcome. There is limited data on the clinical outcome and CT based tunnel placement evaluation in femur and tibia of Indian nonathletic population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty non-athletic patients with mean age of 25.50±6.9 years and ACL rupture who underwent single bundle hamstring autograft arthroscopic ACL reconstruction by anteromedial portal were included in the study. Their preoperative IKDC Score, Lysholm-Tegner score, Tegner activity level were calculated and knee stability was assessed clinically using anterior drawer test, Lachman test and pivot shift test. The CT scan of the operated knee was done once the complete extension of the knee was achieved. Using the multimodality workstation available at the department of radio-diagnosis the tunnel parameters of femoral and tibial tunnel was calculated. After 6 months the patients were reassessed for clinical and radiological outcome. The postoperative outcome was compared with preoperative outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant difference in preoperative and postoperative score, the difference in IKDC score was 15.08 points, improvement of 14.65 points was seen in Lysholm-Tegner score and there was marked improvement in Tegner activity level. Tests for knee stability were normal in >90% of patients postoperatively. The CT evaluation showed that the femoral tunnels were positioned at 28.45%±3.69% (20.16%-38.35%) along the deep-shallow axis and 25.81%±3.819% (20.69%-37.35%), the mean tunnel obliquity compared to the femoral shaft axis were 47.34°±5.427° (37.68°-58.16°) in the coronal plane and 47.93°±7.023° (35.11°-63.95°), the mean tunnel length was 3.38 cm±0.331 cm (2.79 cm-4.18 cm). The tibial tunnel were positioned at 45.63%±5.832% (32.23%-58.23%) along the anterior-posterior axis and 47.70%±2.26% (42.40%-51.96%) along the medio-lateral axis. The tibial tunnel length was found to be 3.89 cm±0.519 cm (3.05 cm-5.06 cm).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study helps to ascertain that the ACL reconstruction via anteromedial portal technique using femoral offset zig followed by postoperative home-based rehabilitation technique gives favorable clinical outcomes in Indian non-athletic patients. All patients had improvement in stability of knee after the surgery. The position of femoral tunnels was anatomical but in comparison to Caucasian patients its placement was deeper and higher. Hence, we conclude that the anteromedial portal technique of ACL reconstruction provides favorable clinical outcome and adequate anatomical tunnel placement in Indian non athletic patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":45488,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Burns and Trauma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9845806/pdf/ijbt0012-0232.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Burns and Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The morphology of distal femur and proximal tibia varies between different ethnicities, and it can affect the tunnel dimensions and positions while doing ACL reconstruction which may affect the clinical outcome. There is limited data on the clinical outcome and CT based tunnel placement evaluation in femur and tibia of Indian nonathletic population.

Methods: Thirty non-athletic patients with mean age of 25.50±6.9 years and ACL rupture who underwent single bundle hamstring autograft arthroscopic ACL reconstruction by anteromedial portal were included in the study. Their preoperative IKDC Score, Lysholm-Tegner score, Tegner activity level were calculated and knee stability was assessed clinically using anterior drawer test, Lachman test and pivot shift test. The CT scan of the operated knee was done once the complete extension of the knee was achieved. Using the multimodality workstation available at the department of radio-diagnosis the tunnel parameters of femoral and tibial tunnel was calculated. After 6 months the patients were reassessed for clinical and radiological outcome. The postoperative outcome was compared with preoperative outcome.

Results: There was a significant difference in preoperative and postoperative score, the difference in IKDC score was 15.08 points, improvement of 14.65 points was seen in Lysholm-Tegner score and there was marked improvement in Tegner activity level. Tests for knee stability were normal in >90% of patients postoperatively. The CT evaluation showed that the femoral tunnels were positioned at 28.45%±3.69% (20.16%-38.35%) along the deep-shallow axis and 25.81%±3.819% (20.69%-37.35%), the mean tunnel obliquity compared to the femoral shaft axis were 47.34°±5.427° (37.68°-58.16°) in the coronal plane and 47.93°±7.023° (35.11°-63.95°), the mean tunnel length was 3.38 cm±0.331 cm (2.79 cm-4.18 cm). The tibial tunnel were positioned at 45.63%±5.832% (32.23%-58.23%) along the anterior-posterior axis and 47.70%±2.26% (42.40%-51.96%) along the medio-lateral axis. The tibial tunnel length was found to be 3.89 cm±0.519 cm (3.05 cm-5.06 cm).

Conclusion: This study helps to ascertain that the ACL reconstruction via anteromedial portal technique using femoral offset zig followed by postoperative home-based rehabilitation technique gives favorable clinical outcomes in Indian non-athletic patients. All patients had improvement in stability of knee after the surgery. The position of femoral tunnels was anatomical but in comparison to Caucasian patients its placement was deeper and higher. Hence, we conclude that the anteromedial portal technique of ACL reconstruction provides favorable clinical outcome and adequate anatomical tunnel placement in Indian non athletic patients.

Abstract Image

非运动人群关节镜门静脉前内侧交叉韧带重建后的临床结果和基于计算机断层扫描的隧道放置评估。
背景:不同民族股骨远端和胫骨近端形态不同,在进行前交叉韧带重建时,会影响隧道的尺寸和位置,影响临床疗效。关于印度非运动人群股骨和胫骨的临床结果和基于CT的隧道放置评估的数据有限。方法:选取30例平均年龄25.50±6.9岁、ACL破裂的非运动患者,经前内侧门静脉行单束自体腘绳肌腱关节镜下ACL重建术。计算患者术前IKDC评分、Lysholm-Tegner评分、Tegner活动水平,并采用前抽屉试验、Lachman试验和枢轴移位试验临床评估膝关节稳定性。一旦膝关节完全伸展,就进行手术膝关节的CT扫描。利用放射诊断科现有的多模态工作站计算股骨和胫骨隧道参数。6个月后,重新评估患者的临床和放射学结果。将术后与术前结果进行比较。结果:两组患者术前、术后评分差异有统计学意义,IKDC评分差异15.08分,Lysholm-Tegner评分提高14.65分,Tegner活动水平明显改善。>90%的患者术后膝关节稳定性检查正常。CT检查显示,股骨隧道沿深浅轴的位置分别为28.45%±3.69%(20.16% ~ 38.35%)和25.81%±3.819%(20.69% ~ 37.35%),隧道相对于股轴的平均倾角分别为冠状面47.34°±5.427°(37.68°~ 58.16°)和47.93°±7.023°(35.11°~ 63.95°),隧道平均长度为3.38 cm±0.331 cm (2.79 cm ~ 4.18 cm)。胫骨隧道沿前后轴定位45.63%±5.832%(32.23% ~ 58.23%),沿中外侧轴定位47.70%±2.26%(42.40% ~ 51.96%)。胫骨隧道长度为3.89 cm±0.519 cm (3.05 cm-5.06 cm)。结论:本研究有助于确定在印度非运动患者中,采用股骨偏置zig经前内侧门静脉技术重建ACL,并配合术后家庭康复技术,可获得良好的临床效果。所有患者术后膝关节稳定性均有改善。股骨隧道的位置是解剖性的,但与白人患者相比,其位置更深,更高。因此,我们得出结论,前内侧门静脉技术的ACL重建提供了良好的临床结果和适当的解剖隧道放置在印度非运动患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
12.50%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信