Evaluating the efficacy of oxytocin for pain management: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials and observational studies.

IF 2 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Anastasia A Mekhael, Jennifer E Bent, Jonathan M Fawcett, Tavis S Campbell, Aldo Aguirre-Camacho, Alison Farrell, Joshua A Rash
{"title":"Evaluating the efficacy of oxytocin for pain management: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials and observational studies.","authors":"Anastasia A Mekhael,&nbsp;Jennifer E Bent,&nbsp;Jonathan M Fawcett,&nbsp;Tavis S Campbell,&nbsp;Aldo Aguirre-Camacho,&nbsp;Alison Farrell,&nbsp;Joshua A Rash","doi":"10.1080/24740527.2023.2191114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a need for novel analgesics with favorable risk to benefit profiles. Oxytocin has recently gained attention for its potential analgesic properties.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to perform an updated systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the effect of oxytocin for pain management.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched for articles reporting on associations between oxytocin and chronic pain management from January 2012 to February 2022. Studies published before 2012 that were identified in our previous systematic review were also eligible. Risk of bias of included studies was assessed. Synthesis of results was performed using meta-analysis and narrative synthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Searches returned 2087 unique citations. In total, 14 articles were included that reported on 1504 people living with pain. Results from meta-analysis and narrative review were mixed. Meta-analysis of three studies indicated that exogenous oxytocin administration did not result in a significant reduction in pain intensity relative to placebo (<i>N</i> = 3; <i>n</i> = 95; <i>g</i> = 0.31; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.10, 0.73). Narrative review provided encouraging evidence that exogenous oxytocin administration reduced pain sensitivity among individuals with back pain, abdominal pain, and migraines. Results suggested that individual difference factors (e.g., sex and chronic pain condition) may influence oxytocin-induced nociception, but the heterogeneity and limited number of studies identified precluded further investigation.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>There is equipoise for the benefit of oxytocin for pain management. Future studies are imperative and should undertake more precise exploration of potential confounds and mechanisms of analgesic action to clarify inconsistency in the literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":53214,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur","volume":"7 1","pages":"2191114"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10187080/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24740527.2023.2191114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: There is a need for novel analgesics with favorable risk to benefit profiles. Oxytocin has recently gained attention for its potential analgesic properties.

Aim: The aim of this study was to perform an updated systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the effect of oxytocin for pain management.

Method: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched for articles reporting on associations between oxytocin and chronic pain management from January 2012 to February 2022. Studies published before 2012 that were identified in our previous systematic review were also eligible. Risk of bias of included studies was assessed. Synthesis of results was performed using meta-analysis and narrative synthesis.

Results: Searches returned 2087 unique citations. In total, 14 articles were included that reported on 1504 people living with pain. Results from meta-analysis and narrative review were mixed. Meta-analysis of three studies indicated that exogenous oxytocin administration did not result in a significant reduction in pain intensity relative to placebo (N = 3; n = 95; g = 0.31; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.10, 0.73). Narrative review provided encouraging evidence that exogenous oxytocin administration reduced pain sensitivity among individuals with back pain, abdominal pain, and migraines. Results suggested that individual difference factors (e.g., sex and chronic pain condition) may influence oxytocin-induced nociception, but the heterogeneity and limited number of studies identified precluded further investigation.

Discussion: There is equipoise for the benefit of oxytocin for pain management. Future studies are imperative and should undertake more precise exploration of potential confounds and mechanisms of analgesic action to clarify inconsistency in the literature.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

评估催产素对疼痛管理的功效:随机临床试验和观察性研究的最新系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:需要一种具有良好风险和获益关系的新型镇痛药。催产素最近因其潜在的镇痛特性而受到关注。目的:本研究的目的是进行一项更新的系统回顾和荟萃分析,评估催产素对疼痛管理的影响。方法:检索2012年1月至2022年2月期间,MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO、CINAHL和Clinicaltrials.gov网站上报道催产素与慢性疼痛管理之间关系的文章。在我们之前的系统综述中确定的2012年之前发表的研究也符合条件。评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。综合结果采用荟萃分析和叙事综合。结果:搜索返回了2087个唯一引用。总共有14篇文章报道了1504名患有疼痛的人。荟萃分析和叙述性回顾的结果是混合的。三项研究的荟萃分析表明,相对于安慰剂,外源性催产素给药并没有导致疼痛强度的显著降低(N = 3;N = 95;G = 0.31;95%置信区间[CI] -0.10, 0.73)。叙述性回顾提供了令人鼓舞的证据,外源性催产素管理降低了背痛,腹痛和偏头痛患者的疼痛敏感性。结果表明,个体差异因素(如性别和慢性疼痛状况)可能影响催产素诱导的伤害感受,但异质性和有限的研究数量排除了进一步的研究。讨论:催产素对疼痛管理的益处是平衡的。未来的研究是必要的,应该对潜在的混淆和镇痛作用机制进行更精确的探索,以澄清文献中的不一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信