The effectiveness of psychological interventions for reducing poor body image in endometriosis, PCOS and other gynaecological conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 6.6 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Health Psychology Review Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-07 DOI:10.1080/17437199.2023.2245020
Melissa J Pehlivan, Kerry A Sherman, Viviana Wuthrich, Esther Gandhi, Dino Zagic, Emily Kopp, Valentina Perica
{"title":"The effectiveness of psychological interventions for reducing poor body image in endometriosis, PCOS and other gynaecological conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Melissa J Pehlivan, Kerry A Sherman, Viviana Wuthrich, Esther Gandhi, Dino Zagic, Emily Kopp, Valentina Perica","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2023.2245020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gynaecological conditions (e.g., endometriosis, PCOS) result in bodily changes that negatively impact body image. Psychological interventions (e.g., CBT, psychoeducation) have shown promise in reviews with the general population for alleviating body image concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to provide asynthesis of the impact of psychological interventions for reducing body image concerns for individuals with gynaecological conditions. Electronic databases were searched for relevant psychological intervention studies with body image outcomes. Twenty-one eligible studies were included in the systematic review (ten were included in a random-effects meta-analysis). Studies included participants (<i>N</i> = 1483, <i>M</i> = 71.85, <i>SD</i> = 52.79) with a range of gynaecological conditions, ages (<i>M</i><sub>age </sub><i>= </i>35.08, SD = 12.17) and cultural backgrounds. Most included studies reported at least one positive effect with the meta-analysis indicating psychological interventions were moderately superior to control conditions for reducing body image concerns (SMD -.41, 95% CI [-0.20 -0.62]). However, there was a high risk of bias and moderate heterogeneity. Results suggest psychological interventions may hold promise for reducing body image concerns among individuals gynaecological conditions in the short term. Further, preliminary support was found for the use of theory-guided psychological interventions delivered in group settings in particular, with further research needed on optimal intervention length and particular psychotherapeutic approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"341-368"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2023.2245020","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gynaecological conditions (e.g., endometriosis, PCOS) result in bodily changes that negatively impact body image. Psychological interventions (e.g., CBT, psychoeducation) have shown promise in reviews with the general population for alleviating body image concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to provide asynthesis of the impact of psychological interventions for reducing body image concerns for individuals with gynaecological conditions. Electronic databases were searched for relevant psychological intervention studies with body image outcomes. Twenty-one eligible studies were included in the systematic review (ten were included in a random-effects meta-analysis). Studies included participants (N = 1483, M = 71.85, SD = 52.79) with a range of gynaecological conditions, ages (Mage = 35.08, SD = 12.17) and cultural backgrounds. Most included studies reported at least one positive effect with the meta-analysis indicating psychological interventions were moderately superior to control conditions for reducing body image concerns (SMD -.41, 95% CI [-0.20 -0.62]). However, there was a high risk of bias and moderate heterogeneity. Results suggest psychological interventions may hold promise for reducing body image concerns among individuals gynaecological conditions in the short term. Further, preliminary support was found for the use of theory-guided psychological interventions delivered in group settings in particular, with further research needed on optimal intervention length and particular psychotherapeutic approach.

心理干预对减少子宫内膜异位症、多囊卵巢综合症和其他妇科疾病患者不良身体形象的有效性:系统综述和荟萃分析。
妇科疾病(如子宫内膜异位症、多囊卵巢综合症)会导致身体变化,从而对身体形象产生负面影响。心理干预(如 CBT、心理教育)在对普通人群的回顾中显示出缓解身体形象问题的前景。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在综合分析心理干预对减轻妇科疾病患者身体形象问题的影响。我们在电子数据库中搜索了与身体形象结果相关的心理干预研究。21项符合条件的研究被纳入系统综述(10项被纳入随机效应荟萃分析)。研究纳入了不同妇科疾病、年龄(Mage = 35.08,SD = 12.17)和文化背景的参与者(N = 1483,M = 71.85,SD = 52.79)。大多数纳入的研究都报告了至少一项积极效果,荟萃分析表明,在减少身体形象问题方面,心理干预的效果略优于对照组(SMD -.41,95% CI [-0.20 -0.62])。然而,该研究存在较高的偏倚风险和中等程度的异质性。研究结果表明,心理干预可能有望在短期内减轻妇科疾病患者对身体形象的担忧。此外,研究还初步支持使用理论指导下的心理干预,尤其是在团体环境中进行干预,但还需要进一步研究最佳干预时间和特定的心理治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Psychology Review
Health Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The publication of Health Psychology Review (HPR) marks a significant milestone in the field of health psychology, as it is the first review journal dedicated to this important and rapidly growing discipline. Edited by a highly respected team, HPR provides a critical platform for the review, development of theories, and conceptual advancements in health psychology. This prestigious international forum not only contributes to the progress of health psychology but also fosters its connection with the broader field of psychology and other related academic and professional domains. With its vital insights, HPR is a must-read for those involved in the study, teaching, and practice of health psychology, behavioral medicine, and related areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信