Surgical Site Infection Prevention: A Review.

IF 55 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Jessica L Seidelman, Christopher R Mantyh, Deverick J Anderson
{"title":"Surgical Site Infection Prevention: A Review.","authors":"Jessica L Seidelman,&nbsp;Christopher R Mantyh,&nbsp;Deverick J Anderson","doi":"10.1001/jama.2022.24075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Approximately 0.5% to 3% of patients undergoing surgery will experience infection at or adjacent to the surgical incision site. Compared with patients undergoing surgery who do not have a surgical site infection, those with a surgical site infection are hospitalized approximately 7 to 11 days longer.</p><p><strong>Observations: </strong>Most surgical site infections can be prevented if appropriate strategies are implemented. These infections are typically caused when bacteria from the patient's endogenous flora are inoculated into the surgical site at the time of surgery. Development of an infection depends on various factors such as the health of the patient's immune system, presence of foreign material, degree of bacterial wound contamination, and use of antibiotic prophylaxis. Although numerous strategies are recommended by international organizations to decrease surgical site infection, only 6 general strategies are supported by randomized trials. Interventions that are associated with lower rates of infection include avoiding razors for hair removal (4.4% with razors vs 2.5% with clippers); decolonization with intranasal antistaphylococcal agents and antistaphylococcal skin antiseptics for high-risk procedures (0.8% with decolonization vs 2% without); use of chlorhexidine gluconate and alcohol-based skin preparation (4.0% with chlorhexidine gluconate plus alcohol vs 6.5% with povidone iodine plus alcohol); maintaining normothermia with active warming such as warmed intravenous fluids, skin warming, and warm forced air to keep the body temperature warmer than 36 °C (4.7% with active warming vs 13% without); perioperative glycemic control (9.4% with glucose <150 mg/dL vs 16% with glucose >150 mg/dL); and use of negative pressure wound therapy (9.7% with vs 15% without). Guidelines recommend appropriate dosing, timing, and choice of preoperative parenteral antimicrobial prophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Surgical site infections affect approximately 0.5% to 3% of patients undergoing surgery and are associated with longer hospital stays than patients with no surgical site infections. Avoiding razors for hair removal, maintaining normothermia, use of chlorhexidine gluconate plus alcohol-based skin preparation agents, decolonization with intranasal antistaphylococcal agents and antistaphylococcal skin antiseptics for high-risk procedures, controlling for perioperative glucose concentrations, and using negative pressure wound therapy can reduce the rate of surgical site infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":54909,"journal":{"name":"Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association","volume":"329 3","pages":"244-252"},"PeriodicalIF":55.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"40","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.24075","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 40

Abstract

Importance: Approximately 0.5% to 3% of patients undergoing surgery will experience infection at or adjacent to the surgical incision site. Compared with patients undergoing surgery who do not have a surgical site infection, those with a surgical site infection are hospitalized approximately 7 to 11 days longer.

Observations: Most surgical site infections can be prevented if appropriate strategies are implemented. These infections are typically caused when bacteria from the patient's endogenous flora are inoculated into the surgical site at the time of surgery. Development of an infection depends on various factors such as the health of the patient's immune system, presence of foreign material, degree of bacterial wound contamination, and use of antibiotic prophylaxis. Although numerous strategies are recommended by international organizations to decrease surgical site infection, only 6 general strategies are supported by randomized trials. Interventions that are associated with lower rates of infection include avoiding razors for hair removal (4.4% with razors vs 2.5% with clippers); decolonization with intranasal antistaphylococcal agents and antistaphylococcal skin antiseptics for high-risk procedures (0.8% with decolonization vs 2% without); use of chlorhexidine gluconate and alcohol-based skin preparation (4.0% with chlorhexidine gluconate plus alcohol vs 6.5% with povidone iodine plus alcohol); maintaining normothermia with active warming such as warmed intravenous fluids, skin warming, and warm forced air to keep the body temperature warmer than 36 °C (4.7% with active warming vs 13% without); perioperative glycemic control (9.4% with glucose <150 mg/dL vs 16% with glucose >150 mg/dL); and use of negative pressure wound therapy (9.7% with vs 15% without). Guidelines recommend appropriate dosing, timing, and choice of preoperative parenteral antimicrobial prophylaxis.

Conclusions and relevance: Surgical site infections affect approximately 0.5% to 3% of patients undergoing surgery and are associated with longer hospital stays than patients with no surgical site infections. Avoiding razors for hair removal, maintaining normothermia, use of chlorhexidine gluconate plus alcohol-based skin preparation agents, decolonization with intranasal antistaphylococcal agents and antistaphylococcal skin antiseptics for high-risk procedures, controlling for perioperative glucose concentrations, and using negative pressure wound therapy can reduce the rate of surgical site infections.

手术部位感染预防:综述。
重要性:大约0.5%至3%的手术患者在手术切口处或附近会发生感染。与没有手术部位感染的手术患者相比,手术部位感染的患者住院时间大约长7至11天。观察:如果实施适当的策略,大多数手术部位感染是可以预防的。这些感染通常是由患者内源性菌群的细菌在手术时接种到手术部位引起的。感染的发展取决于多种因素,如患者免疫系统的健康状况、异物的存在、细菌伤口污染的程度以及抗生素预防的使用。虽然国际组织推荐了许多策略来减少手术部位感染,但随机试验只支持6种一般策略。与较低感染率相关的干预措施包括避免使用剃刀脱毛(使用剃刀的比例为4.4%,使用剪刀的比例为2.5%);在高危手术中使用鼻内抗葡萄球菌药物和抗葡萄球菌皮肤杀菌剂去菌落(有去菌落0.8% vs无去菌落2%);使用葡萄糖酸氯己定和酒精基皮肤制剂(葡萄糖酸氯己定加酒精4.0% vs聚维酮碘加酒精6.5%);通过主动加温来维持体温正常,如加热静脉输液、皮肤加温和温暖的强制空气,使体温保持在36°C以上(4.7%采取主动加温,13%不采取主动加温);围手术期血糖控制(9.4%,葡萄糖150 mg/dL);负压创面治疗(有组9.7% vs无组15%)。指南推荐适当的剂量、时间和术前肠外抗菌预防的选择。结论和相关性:手术部位感染影响约0.5%至3%的手术患者,与没有手术部位感染的患者相比,手术部位感染的住院时间更长。脱毛时避免使用剃刀,保持体温正常,使用葡萄糖酸氯己定加酒精基皮肤制剂,在高危手术中使用鼻内抗葡萄球菌药物和抗葡萄球菌皮肤防腐剂去菌落,控制围手术期葡萄糖浓度,使用负压伤口治疗可降低手术部位感染的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
48.20
自引率
0.90%
发文量
1569
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association) is an international peer-reviewed general medical journal. It has been published continuously since 1883. JAMA is a member of the JAMA Network, which is a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信