Intelligibility in Context Scale: Psychometric evidence and implications for Saudi Arabic-English-speaking preschoolers.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Dalia M Abdulkader, Karla N Washington, Leslie E Kokotek, Asrar Al-Tuwairqi, Anfal Al-Tamimi
{"title":"Intelligibility in Context Scale: Psychometric evidence and implications for Saudi Arabic-English-speaking preschoolers.","authors":"Dalia M Abdulkader, Karla N Washington, Leslie E Kokotek, Asrar Al-Tuwairqi, Anfal Al-Tamimi","doi":"10.1080/17549507.2023.2240040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Purpose</i>: To evaluate the reliability, validity, and diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity) of the Intelligibility in Context Scale in Saudi Arabic (ICS-SA) and English (ICS-E) as potential measures of functional speech intelligibility in bilingual preschool-aged Saudi Arabian children.<i>Method:</i> The study included 36 parent-child (aged 3;0 to 6;5 years; months) dyads who were bilingual speakers of Saudi Arabic and English, which included two groups-typically developing (TD, <i>n</i> = 29) and suspected speech sound disordered (sSSD, <i>n</i> = 7). The children's intelligibility was evaluated in both languages using the ICS-SA and ICS-E. Children's single-word productions were collected in both languages and calculated for percentage of consonants, vowels, and phonemes correct (i.e. PCC/PVC/PPC) to establish their speech-sound competence.<i>Result:</i> The mean scores for the entire sample (<i>n</i> = 36) were 4.43 (<i>SD</i> = 0.79) for the ICS-SA and 4.48 (<i>SD</i> = 0.79) for the ICS-E, showing that parents rated their children's intelligibility in both languages similarly. Both the ICS-SA and ICS-E demonstrated excellent internal consistency (α = 0.96 and α = 0.95, respectively). There was high inter-rater and test-retest reliability for the ICS-SA, while there was fair to high inter-rater and test-retest reliability in ICS-E. Significant correlations were found for the ICS-SA, but weak correlations were noted for the ICS-E, which indicated fair to moderate evidence of criterion validity. Construct validity efforts indicated a weak correlation with age on both the ICS-SA and ICS-E. The findings also indicated high discriminant accuracy for both the ICS-SA (0.86, 0.86) and ICS-E (0.71, 0.69).<i>Conclusion:</i> This study provides initial validation and reliability evidence for using the ICS-SA and ICS-E with Saudi Arabic- and English-speaking preschoolers, however, ICS-E scores suggest further testing is warranted. By extension, these findings expand the bilingual knowledge base and offer new tools for identifying children in Saudi Arabia who may be at risk for having a speech sound disorder.</p>","PeriodicalId":49047,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"544-555"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2023.2240040","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the reliability, validity, and diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity) of the Intelligibility in Context Scale in Saudi Arabic (ICS-SA) and English (ICS-E) as potential measures of functional speech intelligibility in bilingual preschool-aged Saudi Arabian children.Method: The study included 36 parent-child (aged 3;0 to 6;5 years; months) dyads who were bilingual speakers of Saudi Arabic and English, which included two groups-typically developing (TD, n = 29) and suspected speech sound disordered (sSSD, n = 7). The children's intelligibility was evaluated in both languages using the ICS-SA and ICS-E. Children's single-word productions were collected in both languages and calculated for percentage of consonants, vowels, and phonemes correct (i.e. PCC/PVC/PPC) to establish their speech-sound competence.Result: The mean scores for the entire sample (n = 36) were 4.43 (SD = 0.79) for the ICS-SA and 4.48 (SD = 0.79) for the ICS-E, showing that parents rated their children's intelligibility in both languages similarly. Both the ICS-SA and ICS-E demonstrated excellent internal consistency (α = 0.96 and α = 0.95, respectively). There was high inter-rater and test-retest reliability for the ICS-SA, while there was fair to high inter-rater and test-retest reliability in ICS-E. Significant correlations were found for the ICS-SA, but weak correlations were noted for the ICS-E, which indicated fair to moderate evidence of criterion validity. Construct validity efforts indicated a weak correlation with age on both the ICS-SA and ICS-E. The findings also indicated high discriminant accuracy for both the ICS-SA (0.86, 0.86) and ICS-E (0.71, 0.69).Conclusion: This study provides initial validation and reliability evidence for using the ICS-SA and ICS-E with Saudi Arabic- and English-speaking preschoolers, however, ICS-E scores suggest further testing is warranted. By extension, these findings expand the bilingual knowledge base and offer new tools for identifying children in Saudi Arabia who may be at risk for having a speech sound disorder.

语境中的可理解性量表:心理测量学证据及其对沙特阿拉伯语-英语学龄前儿童的影响。
目的:评估沙特阿拉伯语语境智能量表(ICS-SA)和英语语境智能量表(ICS-E)的可靠性、有效性和诊断准确性(灵敏度、特异性),作为衡量沙特阿拉伯学龄前双语儿童功能性语言智能的潜在指标:研究包括 36 个亲子(3;0 至 6;5 岁;月)双语沙特阿拉伯语和英语,其中包括两组--典型发育(TD,n = 29)和疑似言语发音障碍(sSSD,n = 7)。使用 ICS-SA 和 ICS-E 评估儿童两种语言的可懂度。收集儿童的两种语言单词发音,并计算辅音、元音和音素的正确率(即 PCC/PVC/PPC),以确定他们的语音能力:整个样本(n = 36)的平均得分分别为:ICS-SA 4.43(SD = 0.79),ICS-E 4.48(SD = 0.79)。ICS-SA 和 ICS-E 的内部一致性非常好(分别为 α = 0.96 和 α = 0.95)。ICS-SA 的施测者之间和测试-再测的信度都很高,而 ICS-E 的施测者之间和测试-再测的信度一般到很高。在 ICS-SA 中发现了显著的相关性,但在 ICS-E 中却发现了较弱的相关性,这表明标准效度的证据为一般到中等。结构效度工作表明,ICS-SA 和 ICS-E 与年龄的相关性较弱。研究结果还表明,ICS-SA(0.86, 0.86)和 ICS-E (0.71, 0.69)的判别准确性都很高:本研究为在沙特阿拉伯语和英语学龄前儿童中使用 ICS-SA 和 ICS-E 提供了初步的验证和可靠性证据,但是 ICS-E 的得分表明还需要进一步测试。推而广之,这些研究结果扩大了双语知识库,并为识别沙特阿拉伯可能有语言声音障碍风险的儿童提供了新的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
73
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology is an international journal which promotes discussion on a broad range of current clinical and theoretical issues. Submissions may include experimental, review and theoretical discussion papers, with studies from either quantitative and/or qualitative frameworks. Articles may relate to any area of child or adult communication or dysphagia, furthering knowledge on issues related to etiology, assessment, diagnosis, intervention, or theoretical frameworks. Articles can be accompanied by supplementary audio and video files that will be uploaded to the journal’s website. Special issues on contemporary topics are published at least once a year. A scientific forum is included in many issues, where a topic is debated by invited international experts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信