Performance of Fracture Risk Assessment Tools by Race and Ethnicity: A Systematic Review for the ASBMR Task Force on Clinical Algorithms for Fracture Risk

IF 5.1 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Howard A. Fink, Mary E. Butler, Amy M. Claussen, Erin S. Collins, Kristina M. Krohn, Brent C. Taylor, Sina S. Tikabo, Denny Vang, Nicholas L. Zerzan, Kristine E. Ensrud
{"title":"Performance of Fracture Risk Assessment Tools by Race and Ethnicity: A Systematic Review for the ASBMR Task Force on Clinical Algorithms for Fracture Risk","authors":"Howard A. Fink,&nbsp;Mary E. Butler,&nbsp;Amy M. Claussen,&nbsp;Erin S. Collins,&nbsp;Kristina M. Krohn,&nbsp;Brent C. Taylor,&nbsp;Sina S. Tikabo,&nbsp;Denny Vang,&nbsp;Nicholas L. Zerzan,&nbsp;Kristine E. Ensrud","doi":"10.1002/jbmr.4895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The American Society of Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) Professional Practice Committee charged an ASBMR Task Force on Clinical Algorithms for Fracture Risk to review the evidence on whether current approaches for differentiating fracture risk based on race and ethnicity are necessary and valid. To help address these charges, we performed a systematic literature review investigating performance of calculators for predicting incident fractures within and across race and ethnicity groups in middle-aged and older US adults. We included English-language, controlled or prospective cohort studies that enrolled US adults aged &gt;40 years and reported tool performance predicting incident fractures within individual race and ethnicity groups for up to 10 years. From 4838 identified references, six reports met eligibility criteria, all in women. Just three, all from one study, included results in non-white individuals. In these three reports, non-white women experienced relatively few major osteoporotic fractures (MOFs), especially hip fractures, and risk thresholds for predicting fractures in non-white women were derived from risks in the overall, predominantly white study population. One report suggested the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) without bone mineral density (BMD) overestimated hip fracture similarly across race and ethnicity groups (black, Hispanic, American Indian, Asian, white) but overestimated MOF more in non-white than White women. However, these three reports were inconclusive regarding whether discrimination of FRAX or the Garvan calculator without BMD or of FRAX with BMD for MOF or hip fracture differed between white versus black women. This uncertainty was at least partly due to imprecise hip fracture estimates in black women. No reports examined whether ratios of observed to predicted hip fracture risks within each race or ethnicity group varied across levels of predicted hip fracture risk. © 2023 The Authors. <i>Journal of Bone and Mineral Research</i> published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR). This article has been contributed to by U.S. Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.</p>","PeriodicalId":185,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Mineral Research","volume":"38 12","pages":"1731-1741"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jbmr.4895","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Mineral Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jbmr.4895","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The American Society of Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) Professional Practice Committee charged an ASBMR Task Force on Clinical Algorithms for Fracture Risk to review the evidence on whether current approaches for differentiating fracture risk based on race and ethnicity are necessary and valid. To help address these charges, we performed a systematic literature review investigating performance of calculators for predicting incident fractures within and across race and ethnicity groups in middle-aged and older US adults. We included English-language, controlled or prospective cohort studies that enrolled US adults aged >40 years and reported tool performance predicting incident fractures within individual race and ethnicity groups for up to 10 years. From 4838 identified references, six reports met eligibility criteria, all in women. Just three, all from one study, included results in non-white individuals. In these three reports, non-white women experienced relatively few major osteoporotic fractures (MOFs), especially hip fractures, and risk thresholds for predicting fractures in non-white women were derived from risks in the overall, predominantly white study population. One report suggested the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) without bone mineral density (BMD) overestimated hip fracture similarly across race and ethnicity groups (black, Hispanic, American Indian, Asian, white) but overestimated MOF more in non-white than White women. However, these three reports were inconclusive regarding whether discrimination of FRAX or the Garvan calculator without BMD or of FRAX with BMD for MOF or hip fracture differed between white versus black women. This uncertainty was at least partly due to imprecise hip fracture estimates in black women. No reports examined whether ratios of observed to predicted hip fracture risks within each race or ethnicity group varied across levels of predicted hip fracture risk. © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR). This article has been contributed to by U.S. Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.

Abstract Image

按种族和民族划分的骨折风险评估工具的性能:ASBMR骨折风险临床算法工作组的系统回顾。
美国骨与矿物研究学会(ASBMR)专业实践委员会委托ASBMR骨折风险临床算法工作组审查目前基于种族和民族区分骨折风险的方法是否必要和有效的证据。为了帮助解决这些指控,我们进行了一项系统的文献综述,调查了计算器在预测美国中老年人种族和族裔群体内和跨种族群体骨折事件方面的性能。我们纳入了英语、对照或前瞻性队列研究,这些研究招募了年龄>40岁的美国成年人 年,报告的工具性能预测单个种族和民族群体内长达10年的骨折事件 年。在4838份已确定的参考文献中,有6份报告符合资格标准,均为女性。只有三项,全部来自一项研究,包括非白人个体的结果。在这三份报告中,非白人女性经历的严重骨质疏松性骨折(MOF)相对较少,尤其是髋部骨折,预测非白人女性骨折的风险阈值来自于以白人为主的总体研究人群的风险。一份报告表明,没有骨密度(BMD)的骨折风险评估工具(FRAX)高估了不同种族和民族(黑人、西班牙裔、美洲印第安人、亚裔、白人)的髋部骨折,但非白人女性高估MOF的比例高于白人女性。然而,这三份报告对于FRAX或无BMD的Garvan计算器或FRAX有BMD的MOF或髋部骨折的区分在白人和黑人女性之间是否存在差异没有结论。这种不确定性至少部分是由于对黑人女性髋部骨折的估计不准确。没有报告检查每个种族或民族组中观察到的与预测的髋部骨折风险的比率是否因预测的髋部断裂风险水平而异。©2023作者。由Wiley Periodicals LLC代表美国骨与矿物研究学会(ASBMR)出版的《骨与矿产研究杂志》。本文由美国政府雇员撰写,他们的工作在美国属于公共领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
6.50%
发文量
257
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bone and Mineral Research (JBMR) publishes highly impactful original manuscripts, reviews, and special articles on basic, translational and clinical investigations relevant to the musculoskeletal system and mineral metabolism. Specifically, the journal is interested in original research on the biology and physiology of skeletal tissues, interdisciplinary research spanning the musculoskeletal and other systems, including but not limited to immunology, hematology, energy metabolism, cancer biology, and neurology, and systems biology topics using large scale “-omics” approaches. The journal welcomes clinical research on the pathophysiology, treatment and prevention of osteoporosis and fractures, as well as sarcopenia, disorders of bone and mineral metabolism, and rare or genetically determined bone diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信