The effect of the size of the new contour neurovascular device for altering intraaneurysmal flow.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine
Interventional Neuroradiology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-03 DOI:10.1177/15910199221145985
Mariya S Pravdivtseva, Andrey N Pravdivtsev, Sönke Peters, Johannes Hensler, Naomi Larsen, Jan-Bernd Hövener, Olav Jansen, Fritz Wodarg
{"title":"The effect of the size of the new contour neurovascular device for altering intraaneurysmal flow.","authors":"Mariya S Pravdivtseva, Andrey N Pravdivtsev, Sönke Peters, Johannes Hensler, Naomi Larsen, Jan-Bernd Hövener, Olav Jansen, Fritz Wodarg","doi":"10.1177/15910199221145985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recently, a novel intrasaccular device (contour neurovascular system, contour) was introduced to treat intracranial aneurysms. Contour is placed at thе aneurysm neck and reduces the intraaneurysmal blood inflow. Contour comes in a range of sizes to target different aneurysms. The efficiency of altering flow with contour and the effect of device size have not yet been investigated. Therefore, we studied the effect of the device size with patient-based aneurysm models using 2D digital subtraction angiography (DSA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three patient-based aneurysm models with necks ranging from 2.7 to 9.7 mm were produced, providing standardized testing conditions. Contours with diameters of 5, 11, and 14 mm were implanted into the models, four of each size. 2D DSA images were acquired before and after implanting contour (15 frames/s, manual contrast injection). After injecting angiographic contrast agent, the DSA signal was recorded over time to calculate the contrast washout time (WOT), which is a measure of flow diversion efficiency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All contour devices caused contrast agent stasis and increased WOT in aneurysm sac (<i>p</i>-value = 0.0005). The median relative WOT was largest for 5-mm contour (6.6 ± 3.2) and similar for 11-mm contour (3.4 ± 2.6) and 14-mm contour (3.2 ± 3.8). The implantation procedure might affect WOT values even for contours of the same size; the overall relative WOT ranged between 1.5 and 10.89.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 5-mm contour showed the longest WOT value in our study, while no apparent difference between 11-mm contour and 14-mm contour was found.</p>","PeriodicalId":14380,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"49-56"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11833893/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199221145985","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recently, a novel intrasaccular device (contour neurovascular system, contour) was introduced to treat intracranial aneurysms. Contour is placed at thе aneurysm neck and reduces the intraaneurysmal blood inflow. Contour comes in a range of sizes to target different aneurysms. The efficiency of altering flow with contour and the effect of device size have not yet been investigated. Therefore, we studied the effect of the device size with patient-based aneurysm models using 2D digital subtraction angiography (DSA).

Methods: Three patient-based aneurysm models with necks ranging from 2.7 to 9.7 mm were produced, providing standardized testing conditions. Contours with diameters of 5, 11, and 14 mm were implanted into the models, four of each size. 2D DSA images were acquired before and after implanting contour (15 frames/s, manual contrast injection). After injecting angiographic contrast agent, the DSA signal was recorded over time to calculate the contrast washout time (WOT), which is a measure of flow diversion efficiency.

Results: All contour devices caused contrast agent stasis and increased WOT in aneurysm sac (p-value = 0.0005). The median relative WOT was largest for 5-mm contour (6.6 ± 3.2) and similar for 11-mm contour (3.4 ± 2.6) and 14-mm contour (3.2 ± 3.8). The implantation procedure might affect WOT values even for contours of the same size; the overall relative WOT ranged between 1.5 and 10.89.

Conclusion: The 5-mm contour showed the longest WOT value in our study, while no apparent difference between 11-mm contour and 14-mm contour was found.

新型轮廓神经血管装置的尺寸对改变动脉瘤内血流的影响。
背景:最近,一种治疗颅内动脉瘤的新型肌内装置(轮廓神经血管系统,Contour)问世。Contour 被放置在动脉瘤颈部,可减少动脉瘤内的血液流入。轮廓有各种尺寸,可针对不同的动脉瘤。利用轮廓改变血流的效率以及装置尺寸的影响尚未得到研究。因此,我们使用二维数字减影血管造影术(DSA)研究了基于患者动脉瘤模型的装置尺寸的影响:方法:我们制作了三个以患者为基础的动脉瘤模型,瘤颈直径从 2.7 毫米到 9.7 毫米不等,从而提供了标准化的测试条件。直径分别为 5、11 和 14 毫米的轮廓被植入模型中,每种尺寸各四个。在植入轮廓之前和之后采集二维 DSA 图像(15 帧/秒,手动注射造影剂)。注入血管造影剂后,记录 DSA 信号的变化时间,以计算造影剂冲出时间(WOT),这是衡量血流分流效率的指标:结果:所有轮廓设备都会导致造影剂淤积,增加动脉瘤囊的 WOT(P 值 = 0.0005)。5毫米轮廓的中位相对WOT最大(6.6 ± 3.2),11毫米轮廓(3.4 ± 2.6)和14毫米轮廓(3.2 ± 3.8)的中位相对WOT相似。即使轮廓尺寸相同,植入过程也会影响 WOT 值;总体相对 WOT 值介于 1.5 和 10.89 之间:在我们的研究中,5 毫米轮廓的 WOT 值最长,而 11 毫米轮廓和 14 毫米轮廓的 WOT 值没有明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信