Tenacious educational neuromyths: Prevalence among teachers and an intervention

IF 3.4 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Hector Ruiz-Martin , Marta Portero-Tresserra , Agustín Martínez-Molina , Marta Ferrero
{"title":"Tenacious educational neuromyths: Prevalence among teachers and an intervention","authors":"Hector Ruiz-Martin ,&nbsp;Marta Portero-Tresserra ,&nbsp;Agustín Martínez-Molina ,&nbsp;Marta Ferrero","doi":"10.1016/j.tine.2022.100192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Several studies have revealed a common high prevalence of educational neuromyths among teachers from different countries. However, only one intervention aimed at reducing these beliefs among in-service teachers has been reported to date, and it was conducted in a non-naturalistic setting.</p></div><div><h3>Procedure</h3><p>In the present study, we administered a survey to measure the prevalence of common neuromyths in a large sample (<em>n</em><span> = 807) of primary and secondary teachers from 203 schools across Catalonia (Spain), and then we evaluated the impact that a 15-hour online course on neuroscience had on a sample of them as compared to a control group.</span></p></div><div><h3>Main findings</h3><p>Results showed an initial distribution of neuromyth beliefs similar to those of previous studies and a large effect of the intervention on reducing their prevalence shortly after the training and in the long term.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These findings provide evidence that an intervention addressed to in-service teachers that is low-cost and easy to implement can cast corrective effects that persist over time in neuromyth beliefs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46228,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","volume":"29 ","pages":"Article 100192"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211949322000205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background

Several studies have revealed a common high prevalence of educational neuromyths among teachers from different countries. However, only one intervention aimed at reducing these beliefs among in-service teachers has been reported to date, and it was conducted in a non-naturalistic setting.

Procedure

In the present study, we administered a survey to measure the prevalence of common neuromyths in a large sample (n = 807) of primary and secondary teachers from 203 schools across Catalonia (Spain), and then we evaluated the impact that a 15-hour online course on neuroscience had on a sample of them as compared to a control group.

Main findings

Results showed an initial distribution of neuromyth beliefs similar to those of previous studies and a large effect of the intervention on reducing their prevalence shortly after the training and in the long term.

Conclusions

These findings provide evidence that an intervention addressed to in-service teachers that is low-cost and easy to implement can cast corrective effects that persist over time in neuromyth beliefs.

顽固的教育神经神话:教师中的流行与干预
一些研究表明,教育神经神话在不同国家的教师中普遍存在。然而,迄今为止,只有一项旨在减少在职教师这些信念的干预被报道,而且是在非自然主义的环境中进行的。在本研究中,我们对来自加泰罗尼亚(西班牙)203所学校的大样本(n = 807)中小学教师进行了一项调查,以衡量常见神经神话的流行程度,然后我们评估了与对照组相比,15小时的神经科学在线课程对他们样本的影响。主要发现:结果显示,神经神话信念的初始分布与之前的研究相似,干预在训练后不久和长期内对减少其患病率有很大的影响。结论针对在职教师的低成本、易实施的干预措施可以在神经神话信念中产生长期持续的纠正效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
22
审稿时长
65 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信