Iatrogenic Air Embolisms During Endovascular Interventions: Impact of Origin and Number of Air Bubbles on Cerebral Infarctions.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Clinical Neuroradiology Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-04 DOI:10.1007/s00062-023-01347-2
Tabea C Schaefer, Svenja Greive, Stine Mencl, Sabine Heiland, Martin Kramer, Markus A Möhlenbruch, Christoph Kleinschnitz, Martin Bendszus, Dominik F Vollherbst
{"title":"Iatrogenic Air Embolisms During Endovascular Interventions: Impact of Origin and Number of Air Bubbles on Cerebral Infarctions.","authors":"Tabea C Schaefer, Svenja Greive, Stine Mencl, Sabine Heiland, Martin Kramer, Markus A Möhlenbruch, Christoph Kleinschnitz, Martin Bendszus, Dominik F Vollherbst","doi":"10.1007/s00062-023-01347-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Cerebral infarctions caused by air embolisms (AE) are a feared risk in endovascular procedures; however, the relevance and pathophysiology of these AEs is still largely unclear. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of the origin (aorta, carotid artery or right atrium) and number of air bubbles on cerebral infarctions in an experimental in vivo model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 20 rats 1200 or 2000 highly calibrated micro air bubbles (MAB) with a size of 85 µm were injected at the aortic valve (group Ao), into the common carotid artery (group CA) or into the right atrium (group RA) using a microcatheter via a transfemoral access, resembling endovascular interventions in humans. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using a 9.4T system was performed 1 h after MAB injection followed by finalization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number (5.5 vs. 5.5 median) and embolic patterns of infarctions did not significantly differ between groups Ao and CA. The number of infarctions were significantly higher comparing 2000 and 1200 injected MABs (6 vs. 4.5; p < 0.001). The infarctions were significantly larger for group CA (median infarction volume: 0.41 mm<sup>3</sup> vs. 0.19 mm<sup>3</sup>; p < 0.001). In group RA and in the control group no infarctions were detected. Histopathological analyses showed early signs of ischemic stroke.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Iatrogenic AEs originating at the ascending aorta cause a similar number and pattern of cerebral infarctions compared to those with origin at the carotid artery. These findings underline the relevance and potential risk of AE occurring during endovascular interventions at the aortic valve and ascending aorta.</p>","PeriodicalId":10391,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"135-145"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10881616/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-023-01347-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Cerebral infarctions caused by air embolisms (AE) are a feared risk in endovascular procedures; however, the relevance and pathophysiology of these AEs is still largely unclear. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of the origin (aorta, carotid artery or right atrium) and number of air bubbles on cerebral infarctions in an experimental in vivo model.

Methods: In 20 rats 1200 or 2000 highly calibrated micro air bubbles (MAB) with a size of 85 µm were injected at the aortic valve (group Ao), into the common carotid artery (group CA) or into the right atrium (group RA) using a microcatheter via a transfemoral access, resembling endovascular interventions in humans. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using a 9.4T system was performed 1 h after MAB injection followed by finalization.

Results: The number (5.5 vs. 5.5 median) and embolic patterns of infarctions did not significantly differ between groups Ao and CA. The number of infarctions were significantly higher comparing 2000 and 1200 injected MABs (6 vs. 4.5; p < 0.001). The infarctions were significantly larger for group CA (median infarction volume: 0.41 mm3 vs. 0.19 mm3; p < 0.001). In group RA and in the control group no infarctions were detected. Histopathological analyses showed early signs of ischemic stroke.

Conclusion: Iatrogenic AEs originating at the ascending aorta cause a similar number and pattern of cerebral infarctions compared to those with origin at the carotid artery. These findings underline the relevance and potential risk of AE occurring during endovascular interventions at the aortic valve and ascending aorta.

Abstract Image

血管内介入手术中的先天性气栓:气泡的来源和数量对脑梗塞的影响。
目的:由空气栓塞(AE)引起的脑梗塞是血管内手术中一个令人担忧的风险;然而,这些AE的相关性和病理生理学在很大程度上仍不清楚。本研究的目的是在体内实验模型中研究气泡的来源(主动脉、颈动脉或右心房)和数量对脑梗塞的影响:方法:在 20 只大鼠中,使用微导管通过经股动脉入路,在主动脉瓣(Ao 组)、颈总动脉(CA 组)或右心房(RA 组)注射 1200 或 2000 个大小为 85 µm 的高度校准微气泡(MAB),这与人类的血管内介入治疗类似。注射 MAB 1 小时后,使用 9.4T 系统进行磁共振成像(MRI),然后进行最终检查:结果:Ao 组和 CA 组的梗塞数量(5.5 对 5.5 中位数)和栓塞模式无明显差异。与注射 2000 和 1200 MABs 相比,梗塞数量明显增加(6 vs. 4.5;p 3 vs. 0.19 mm3;p 结论:源于升主动脉的先天性损伤与源于颈动脉的先天性损伤导致脑梗塞的数量和模式相似。这些发现强调了在主动脉瓣和升主动脉进行血管内介入时发生 AE 的相关性和潜在风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Neuroradiology
Clinical Neuroradiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Clinical Neuroradiology provides current information, original contributions, and reviews in the field of neuroradiology. An interdisciplinary approach is accomplished by diagnostic and therapeutic contributions related to associated subjects. The international coverage and relevance of the journal is underlined by its being the official journal of the German, Swiss, and Austrian Societies of Neuroradiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信