Drug-related deaths among housed and homeless individuals in the UK and the USA: comparative retrospective cohort study.

IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Emmert Roberts, Caroline Copeland, Keith Humphreys, Chelsea L Shover
{"title":"Drug-related deaths among housed and homeless individuals in the UK and the USA: comparative retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Emmert Roberts, Caroline Copeland, Keith Humphreys, Chelsea L Shover","doi":"10.1192/bjp.2023.111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The UK and USA currently report their highest number of drug-related deaths since records began, with higher rates among individuals experiencing homelessness.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>Given that overdose prevention in homeless populations may require unique strategies, we evaluated whether substances implicated in death differed between (a) housed decedents and those experiencing homelessness and (b) between US and UK homeless populations.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted an internationally comparative retrospective cohort study utilising multilevel multinomial regression modelling of coronial/medical examiner-verified drug-related deaths from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2021. UK data were available for England, Wales and Northern Ireland; US data were collated from eight county jurisdictions. Data were available on decedent age, sex, ethnicity, housing status and substances implicated in death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Homeless individuals accounted for 16.3% of US decedents versus 3.4% in the UK. Opioids were implicated in 66.3 and 50.4% of all studied drug-related deaths in the UK and the USA respectively. UK homeless decedents had a significantly increased risk of having only opioids implicated in death compared with only non-opioids implicated (relative risk ratio RRR = 1.87, 95% CI 1.76-1.98, <i>P</i> < 0.001); conversely, US homeless decedents had a significantly decreased risk (RRR = 0.37, 95% CI 0.29-0.48, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Methamphetamine was implicated in two-thirds (66.7%) of deaths among US homeless decedents compared with 0.4% in the UK.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both the rate and type of drug-related deaths differ significantly between homeless and housed populations in the UK and USA. The two countries also differ in drugs implicated in death. Targeted programmes for country-specific implicated drug profiles appear warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":9259,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10727910/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2023.111","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The UK and USA currently report their highest number of drug-related deaths since records began, with higher rates among individuals experiencing homelessness.

Aims: Given that overdose prevention in homeless populations may require unique strategies, we evaluated whether substances implicated in death differed between (a) housed decedents and those experiencing homelessness and (b) between US and UK homeless populations.

Method: We conducted an internationally comparative retrospective cohort study utilising multilevel multinomial regression modelling of coronial/medical examiner-verified drug-related deaths from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2021. UK data were available for England, Wales and Northern Ireland; US data were collated from eight county jurisdictions. Data were available on decedent age, sex, ethnicity, housing status and substances implicated in death.

Results: Homeless individuals accounted for 16.3% of US decedents versus 3.4% in the UK. Opioids were implicated in 66.3 and 50.4% of all studied drug-related deaths in the UK and the USA respectively. UK homeless decedents had a significantly increased risk of having only opioids implicated in death compared with only non-opioids implicated (relative risk ratio RRR = 1.87, 95% CI 1.76-1.98, P < 0.001); conversely, US homeless decedents had a significantly decreased risk (RRR = 0.37, 95% CI 0.29-0.48, P < 0.001). Methamphetamine was implicated in two-thirds (66.7%) of deaths among US homeless decedents compared with 0.4% in the UK.

Conclusions: Both the rate and type of drug-related deaths differ significantly between homeless and housed populations in the UK and USA. The two countries also differ in drugs implicated in death. Targeted programmes for country-specific implicated drug profiles appear warranted.

英国和美国有房和无家可归者中与毒品有关的死亡:回顾性队列比较研究。
背景:目的:鉴于预防无家可归人群用药过量可能需要独特的策略,我们评估了(a)有住所的死者和无家可归者之间以及(b)美国和英国无家可归人群之间死亡所涉及的药物是否存在差异:我们利用多层次多叉回归模型对 2012 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 31 日期间经验尸官/法医证实的与毒品有关的死亡案例进行了一项国际比较性回顾性队列研究。英国的数据来自英格兰、威尔士和北爱尔兰;美国的数据来自八个郡的辖区。数据涉及死者的年龄、性别、种族、住房状况以及与死亡有关的药物:结果:无家可归者占美国死者的 16.3%,而英国为 3.4%。在英国和美国的所有研究药物相关死亡案例中,分别有 66.3% 和 50.4% 与阿片类药物有关。英国无家可归的死者仅死于阿片类药物的风险明显高于仅死于非阿片类药物的风险(相对风险比 RRR = 1.87,95% CI 1.76-1.98,P < 0.001);相反,美国无家可归的死者的风险明显降低(RRR = 0.37,95% CI 0.29-0.48,P < 0.001)。在美国无家可归的死者中有三分之二(66.7%)的死亡与甲基苯丙胺有关,而在英国只有0.4%:结论:在英国和美国,无家可归者和有家可归者中与毒品相关死亡的比例和类型都有很大不同。结论:英美两国的无家可归者和有家可归者在与毒品相关的死亡比例和类型上都有很大不同。看来有必要针对具体国家的涉毒情况制定有针对性的方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Psychiatry
British Journal of Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
1.90%
发文量
184
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Psychiatry (BJPsych) is a renowned international journal that undergoes rigorous peer review. It covers various branches of psychiatry, with a specific focus on the clinical aspects of each topic. Published monthly by the Royal College of Psychiatrists, this journal is dedicated to enhancing the prevention, investigation, diagnosis, treatment, and care of mental illness worldwide. It also strives to promote global mental health. In addition to featuring authoritative original research articles from across the globe, the journal includes editorials, review articles, commentaries on contentious issues, a comprehensive book review section, and a dynamic correspondence column. BJPsych is an essential source of information for psychiatrists, clinical psychologists, and other professionals interested in mental health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信