Impact of home blood pressure monitors on self-monitoring and control of blood pressure in vulnerable adults.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Blood Pressure Monitoring Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-14 DOI:10.1097/MBP.0000000000000670
Yufei Shi, Carrie McAdam-Marx, Jessica M Downes
{"title":"Impact of home blood pressure monitors on self-monitoring and control of blood pressure in vulnerable adults.","authors":"Yufei Shi, Carrie McAdam-Marx, Jessica M Downes","doi":"10.1097/MBP.0000000000000670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To evaluate associations between home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) and blood pressure (BP) in vulnerable adults during the COVID-19 pandemic, when access to in-person care was restricted. A retrospective cohort study was conducted in adults with hypertension or elevated BP given a home BP monitor vs. usual care. Change in BP from baseline to follow-up was compared between groups, controlling for potential confounders. Subgroup analyses of BP outcomes were also assessed in patients age >50 years. There was no difference in SBP reduction between n = 82 HBPM patients (-11.7/-2.9 mmHg) and n = 280 usual care patients (-12.5/-5.8 mmHg; P > 0.05). Results were similar in multivariable analysis controlling for potential confounders [coefficient 0.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) -3.98 to 4.87]. However, in the subgroup of patients aged>50 years, there was a significant association between SBP reduction and HBPM in the multivariable analyses (coefficient -7.2, 95% CI -13.8 to -0.62, P = 0.032). HBPM use was not associated with BP reduction in vulnerable adults overall during high telehealth use. An association between SBP reduction and HBPM was observed in those aged>50 years. Targeting limited HBPM resources to those aged >50 years old may have the most impact on BP.</p>","PeriodicalId":8950,"journal":{"name":"Blood Pressure Monitoring","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Pressure Monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MBP.0000000000000670","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To evaluate associations between home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) and blood pressure (BP) in vulnerable adults during the COVID-19 pandemic, when access to in-person care was restricted. A retrospective cohort study was conducted in adults with hypertension or elevated BP given a home BP monitor vs. usual care. Change in BP from baseline to follow-up was compared between groups, controlling for potential confounders. Subgroup analyses of BP outcomes were also assessed in patients age >50 years. There was no difference in SBP reduction between n = 82 HBPM patients (-11.7/-2.9 mmHg) and n = 280 usual care patients (-12.5/-5.8 mmHg; P > 0.05). Results were similar in multivariable analysis controlling for potential confounders [coefficient 0.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) -3.98 to 4.87]. However, in the subgroup of patients aged>50 years, there was a significant association between SBP reduction and HBPM in the multivariable analyses (coefficient -7.2, 95% CI -13.8 to -0.62, P = 0.032). HBPM use was not associated with BP reduction in vulnerable adults overall during high telehealth use. An association between SBP reduction and HBPM was observed in those aged>50 years. Targeting limited HBPM resources to those aged >50 years old may have the most impact on BP.

家用血压计对弱势成人自我监测和控制血压的影响。
目的:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,由于现场治疗受到限制,评估家庭血压监测 (HBPM) 与易感成年人血压之间的关系。我们对患有高血压或血压升高的成年人进行了一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象是使用家庭血压监测仪的人群与使用常规护理的人群。在控制潜在混杂因素的情况下,比较了不同组别从基线到随访期间的血压变化。还对年龄大于 50 岁的患者的血压结果进行了分组分析。n = 82 名 HBPM 患者(-11.7/-2.9 mmHg)和 n = 280 名常规护理患者(-12.5/-5.8 mmHg;P > 0.05)之间的 SBP 降幅没有差异。在控制潜在混杂因素的多变量分析中,结果相似[系数 0.44,95% 置信区间 (CI) -3.98 至 4.87]。然而,在年龄大于 50 岁的患者亚组中,SBP 下降与 HBPM 的多变量分析有显著相关性(系数 -7.2,95% CI -13.8 至 -0.62,P = 0.032)。在远程保健使用率较高的情况下,HBPM 的使用与易感人群总体血压的降低无关。在年龄大于 50 岁的人群中,观察到 SBP 下降与 HBPM 之间存在关联。将有限的 HBPM 资源用于年龄大于 50 岁的人群可能会对血压产生最大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Blood Pressure Monitoring
Blood Pressure Monitoring 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
110
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Blood Pressure Monitoring is devoted to original research in blood pressure measurement and blood pressure variability. It includes device technology, analytical methodology of blood pressure over time and its variability, clinical trials - including, but not limited to, pharmacology - involving blood pressure monitoring, blood pressure reactivity, patient evaluation, and outcomes and effectiveness research. This innovative journal contains papers dealing with all aspects of manual, automated, and ambulatory monitoring. Basic and clinical science papers are considered although the emphasis is on clinical medicine. Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信