Baseline Cohort Profile of the Korean Chronic Cough Registry: A Multicenter, Prospective, Observational Study.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Lung Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-02 DOI:10.1007/s00408-023-00644-4
Eun-Jung Jo, Ji-Hyang Lee, Ha-Kyeong Won, Noeul Kang, Sung-Yoon Kang, Seung Eun Lee, Ji-Ho Lee, Mi-Yeong Kim, Ji-Su Shim, Jin An, Youngsang Yoo, So-Young Park, Byung-Keun Kim, Ji-Yong Moon, Han-Ki Park, Min-Hye Kim, Hyouk-Soo Kwon, Sae-Hoon Kim, Sang-Heon Kim, Yoon-Seok Chang, Sang-Hoon Kim, Surinder S Birring, Byung-Jae Lee, Woo-Jung Song
{"title":"Baseline Cohort Profile of the Korean Chronic Cough Registry: A Multicenter, Prospective, Observational Study.","authors":"Eun-Jung Jo, Ji-Hyang Lee, Ha-Kyeong Won, Noeul Kang, Sung-Yoon Kang, Seung Eun Lee, Ji-Ho Lee, Mi-Yeong Kim, Ji-Su Shim, Jin An, Youngsang Yoo, So-Young Park, Byung-Keun Kim, Ji-Yong Moon, Han-Ki Park, Min-Hye Kim, Hyouk-Soo Kwon, Sae-Hoon Kim, Sang-Heon Kim, Yoon-Seok Chang, Sang-Hoon Kim, Surinder S Birring, Byung-Jae Lee, Woo-Jung Song","doi":"10.1007/s00408-023-00644-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Korean Chronic Cough Registry study was initiated to characterize patients with chronic cough (CC) and investigate their outcomes in real-world clinical practice. This report aims to describe the baseline cohort profile and study protocols.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter, prospective observational cohort study included newly referred CC patients and those already being treated for refractory or unexplained chronic cough (RUCC). Cough status was assessed using a visual analog scale, the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ), and the Cough Hypersensitivity Questionnaire (CHQ).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 610 patients (66.9% women; median age 59.0 years) were recruited from 18 centers, with 176 being RUCC patients (28.9%). The median age at CC onset was 50.1 years, and 94.4% had adult-onset CC (≥ 19 years). The median cough duration was 4 years. Compared to newly referred CC patients, RUCC patients had a longer cough duration (6.0 years vs. 3.0 years) but had fewer symptoms and signs suggesting asthma, rhinosinusitis, or gastroesophageal acid reflux disease. Subjects with RUCC had lower LCQ scores (10.3 ± 3.3 vs. 11.6 ± 3.6; P < 0.001) and higher CHQ scores (9.1 ± 3.9 vs. 8.4 ± 4.1; P = 0.024). There were no marked differences in the characteristics of cough between refractory chronic cough and unexplained chronic cough.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Chronic cough typically develops in adulthood, lasting for years. Cough severity and quality of life impairment indicate the presence of unmet clinical needs and insufficient cough control in real-world clinical practice. Longitudinal follow-up is warranted to investigate the natural history and treatment outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":18163,"journal":{"name":"Lung","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lung","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-023-00644-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The Korean Chronic Cough Registry study was initiated to characterize patients with chronic cough (CC) and investigate their outcomes in real-world clinical practice. This report aims to describe the baseline cohort profile and study protocols.

Methods: This multicenter, prospective observational cohort study included newly referred CC patients and those already being treated for refractory or unexplained chronic cough (RUCC). Cough status was assessed using a visual analog scale, the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ), and the Cough Hypersensitivity Questionnaire (CHQ).

Results: A total of 610 patients (66.9% women; median age 59.0 years) were recruited from 18 centers, with 176 being RUCC patients (28.9%). The median age at CC onset was 50.1 years, and 94.4% had adult-onset CC (≥ 19 years). The median cough duration was 4 years. Compared to newly referred CC patients, RUCC patients had a longer cough duration (6.0 years vs. 3.0 years) but had fewer symptoms and signs suggesting asthma, rhinosinusitis, or gastroesophageal acid reflux disease. Subjects with RUCC had lower LCQ scores (10.3 ± 3.3 vs. 11.6 ± 3.6; P < 0.001) and higher CHQ scores (9.1 ± 3.9 vs. 8.4 ± 4.1; P = 0.024). There were no marked differences in the characteristics of cough between refractory chronic cough and unexplained chronic cough.

Conclusions: Chronic cough typically develops in adulthood, lasting for years. Cough severity and quality of life impairment indicate the presence of unmet clinical needs and insufficient cough control in real-world clinical practice. Longitudinal follow-up is warranted to investigate the natural history and treatment outcomes.

Abstract Image

韩国慢性咳嗽登记的基线队列概况:一项多中心、前瞻性、观察性研究。
目的:韩国慢性咳嗽登记研究旨在描述慢性咳嗽(CC)患者的特征,并调查他们在现实世界临床实践中的结果。本报告旨在描述基线队列概况和研究方案。方法:这项多中心、前瞻性观察队列研究包括新转诊的CC患者和那些已经因顽固性或不明原因的慢性咳嗽(RUCC)接受治疗的患者。使用视觉模拟量表、莱斯特咳嗽问卷(LCQ)和咳嗽超敏问卷(CHQ)评估咳嗽状况。结果:共有610名患者(66.9%为女性;中位年龄59.0岁)从18个中心招募,其中176名为RUCC患者(28.9%)。CC发作的中位年龄为50.1岁,94.4%为成人发作CC(≥ 19年)。中位咳嗽持续时间为4年。与新转诊的CC患者相比,RUCC患者的咳嗽持续时间更长(6.0年对3.0年),但提示哮喘、鼻窦炎或胃食管酸反流疾病的症状和体征更少。患有RUCC的受试者LCQ得分较低(10.3 ± 3.3对11.6 ± 3.6;P 结论:慢性咳嗽通常发生在成年期,持续数年。咳嗽的严重程度和生活质量受损表明,在现实世界的临床实践中,存在未满足的临床需求和咳嗽控制不足的问题。需要进行纵向随访,以调查自然史和治疗结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lung
Lung 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
95
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Lung publishes original articles, reviews and editorials on all aspects of the healthy and diseased lungs, of the airways, and of breathing. Epidemiological, clinical, pathophysiological, biochemical, and pharmacological studies fall within the scope of the journal. Case reports, short communications and technical notes can be accepted if they are of particular interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信